In some countries, tagging a photo against a person’s will on Facebook could land you in jail. Almost everywhere else in the world, you’re expected to fend for yourself in these matters – sometimes with a little help from Facebook itself. Up until recently, removing the tag was the most that you could do.
In August, an option was made available to users, in the midst of a flurry of changes, to report the image to Facebook. According to AllThingsD, it would seem that many users took to the new feature with gusto.
The first three selections available when reporting a photograph of you to Facebook are, “I don’t like this photo of me,” followed by, “It’s harassing me” and “It’s harassing a friend.”
However, not liking how you look isn’t reason enough for Facebook to take down an offending photo. Facebook’s policy is to remove offensive photos that violate its policies – photographs that portray illegal activities or graphic violence. Unfortunately for the majority of Facebook users, these policies have nothing to do with personal appearance, which is reportedly the driving force behind the reports.
When faced with the option of discussing the photo with their Facebook friends, most users are far more comfortable with taking the easy route of reporting the photo, simply on the grounds that they are dissatisfied with their appearance. Facebook has unleashed a new realm of awkward conversations that you don’t want to have with your friends.
Speaking to NPR, Facebook’s director of engineering Arturo Bejar, explained what they had discovered, sifting through the reported photos:
“We made it such that when you hit report, we ask you if you’re in the photo. And then we ask you if the photo is unflattering or if you don’t like how you show up in it or whether you find it harassing or bullying you. And most people say, you know, I don’t like how I look in this photo. And in the first version we did of this, we put up a blank message box where you can send a message to the person who posted the photo, usually a friend of yours.
And most people faced with that blank box wouldn’t put anything in there in which they would, sort of, step out of the fore because they didn’t know how to handle that conversation with their friends.”
Facebook’s new policy of allowing people who aren’t your friends to tag you in their photos is another issue, but luckily Facebook has afforded users the option to approve tags first before they appear on their profile.
Facebook, and dare we say the Internet as a whole, has opened up an avenue of uncomfortable interactions, with no real solution on how to deal with them.
In the US, according to the law, the minute you step into a public space, you can be photographed without consent, and it’s safe to say that this law extends much further than just in North America. Last year, this freedom came under attack with the TSA likening photographers to terrorists, but the fact remains that, in many countries, a complete stranger can take a photo of you in public, and they are perfectly within their legal right.
So how do you reconcile that kind of law with a Facebook policy that does not afford you the right of having a photograph taken down unless it violates their policies?
The Internet has given its users a platform to share anything they want, and while Facebook moderates to a certain extent, there really is little that they can do. There are doubtless thousands of photos on Facebook of people who don’t even use the social network at all, and so we are faced with a problem with no feasible solution.
Several calls were taking during the NPR interview, presenting a variety of reasons why Facebook users wanted photographs taken down – ranging from being taken at a public gathering to photos of their own children taken at family gatherings. It then becomes far more than a matter of vanity, and extends into how images of you or your family are being viewed on other people’s profiles, rather than by your own friends.
Bejar’s responses highlighted how Facebook’s hands are tied when it comes to moderating its very own service, even in the case of having photos of children taken down, they simply encourage users to talk to each other, and in other words, leave Facebook out of it.


















crazy world out there
facebook timeline covers http://www.coveryoface.com/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like"The minute you step into a public space, you can be photographed without consent"
Anyone know if this #law is applicable in #Canada as well?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMike Kennedy From what I can tell the laws in Canada are a little bit more complex but this site does a great job of outlining it all http://ambientlight.ca/laws/overview/what-can-i-photograph/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIf the photo is taken in a public place no one should be moaning, if you do, you shouldn't be going in public places.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like1. there is a difference between a) taking a picture and b) (publicly) publishing it. You don't need approval to take a picture but you do need approval by the person displayed in the picture to publish it. At least that is the way it is in the Netherlands (a persons portrait is protected similar to the way a work of art is protected by copyrights).
2. A portrait in most cases is personal data. Processing of personal data is only allowed in a limited number of situations. When the personal data refers to minors specific consent by the legal representative of the minor is required. Without this consent the processing of personal data of a minor is against the law...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOnderMijnVoeten Ridiculous law, how do you expect to get permission from say a whole crowd? Over here in the UK you don't need permission if the photo is in a public place.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOnderMijnVoeten I believe in Norway it's the same as the Netherlands - but I can't imagine how they're able to enforce that law.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOnderMijnVoeten I'm sorry, but your explanation of the law in The Netherlands is not correct. You don't need approval to publish a picture, unless it's for commercial use.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOnderMijnVoeten For your information: http://www.iusmentis.com/auteursrecht/nl/foto/portretrecht/
Groet.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Facebook
Social networking means that you, your family, your friends and your photos etc that aren't made private, are made public. This is the nature of social networking. Its also a display of the technical advances we have all signed up to voluntarily over the years and have been desired for many years prior to this. So everybody, learn to keep your private life private. Until then, get a life or stop whining about the one you have chosen to thrust into the public judging arena.
If you're out in public, you should have no expectation of privacy. If someone doesn't like being tagged in a photo they should take it up with the tagger, not FB.
Thanks for sharing!
There are some companies/supervisors that will check over your Facebook and say if you have an album up- it most definitely will be deleted! Thanks for sharing this article!