Credit: Canva
The enforcement arm of the Bureau of Industry and Security, the Commerce Department division that polices chip export controls, is reviewing how Chinese AI firms reach Nvidia hardware overseas, Bloomberg reported. Its focus is a legal one: Chinese companies renting computing power in other countries, rather than importing the chips themselves.
The review builds two lists. One names countries running black markets that move restricted Nvidia chips physically into China, which sits squarely in enforcement’s remit. The other names countries where Chinese firms tap the chips remotely. That second list is unusual, because remote access is not, at present, illegal.
Why now
The trigger is a run of strong Chinese models. Last month Moonshot AI released Kimi K3, which scored nearly as high on benchmarks as the latest systems from Anthropic and OpenAI. A top White House official then accused Moonshot of illegally obtaining Nvidia’s best hardware and reaching those same chips remotely through an unnamed party in Thailand.
That post was not coordinated with Commerce, according to Bloomberg. A few days later, the BIS enforcement team launched its review. Trump said last year that sales of Nvidia’s advanced Blackwell chips to China were off the table. Kimi K3 showed that Chinese firms can still reach those processors through completely legal means.
The contradictions pile up
Washington’s stance is hard to read. Some in the administration have long pushed to close the remote-access loophole. Yet Commerce shelved its own draft rules, including one curbing sales to Malaysia and Thailand over diversion fears. Trump also cleared exports to China of H200 chips, the same model his officials say smugglers are moving.
There is a deeper legal snag. BIS built its powers around the movement of physical goods, so it is unclear whether it can police cloud-computing deals at all. The House has passed bipartisan legislation to grant that authority. Even if it clears the Senate, Nvidia and its peers are certain to fight any limit on overseas data-centre access.
Nvidia has already called export controls the reason it “forfeited the world’s second-largest commercial market to foreign competitors”. It warned that “America cannot afford to lose all of Asia next”. Chinese cloud demand is a big driver of Southeast Asia’s data-centre boom, and the money is real.
A loophole built to hide in
The arrangements resist tracing by design. Buyers rarely name their Chinese clients, and those clients keep their distance even though the rules permit the setup. Alibaba, for one, reaches Nvidia chips in Malaysia through Megaspeed, a Singaporean firm under US investigation for possible diversion.
The two do not deal directly. Alibaba routes the arrangement through a Singaporean shell controlled by a Cayman Islands entity that Alibaba ultimately owns, according to documents Bloomberg reviewed. Both companies declined to comment or did not respond. The chips stay put; only the workloads cross the border. Closing that gap may take a new law, not a new list.
Get the TNW newsletter
Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.
