A statement has been issued by Senator Chris Dodd about SOPA, and it’s a doozy. In the statement Dodd, who coincidentally acts as the Chairman and CEO of the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), says that the Stop Online Piracy Act blackout protests are ‘gimmicks’ that hurt real efforts to combat piracy.
Dodd begins by talking about the various ‘technology business interests’ that are protesting SOPA using blackouts and other means. You can read this as being addressed to Wikipedia, Google and others that are taking a very public stance against SOPA.
“Only days after the White House and chief sponsors of the legislation responded to the major concern expressed by opponents and then called for all parties to work cooperatively together, some technology business interests are resorting to stunts that punish their users or turn them into their corporate pawns, rather than coming to the table to find solutions to a problem that all now seem to agree is very real and damaging.
I love how Dodd goes after the ‘problem’ being real and damaging, not the half-baked and very dangerous SOPA itself. Dodd then goes on to call these companies ‘irresponsible’ for choosing to use their own resources and services to draw users’ attention to the issue. Going further, he calls it an ‘abuse of power’:
It is an irresponsible response and a disservice to people who rely on them for information and use their services. It is also an abuse of power given the freedoms these companies enjoy in the marketplace today. It’s a dangerous and troubling development when the platforms that serve as gateways to information intentionally skew the facts to incite their users in order to further their corporate interests.
Then Dodd spins the blackouts and other protests as efforts that are designed to ‘punish’ elected officials for ‘working…to protect American jobs from foreign criminals’. The language is almost comically inflammatory and twisted.
A so-called “blackout” is yet another gimmick, albeit a dangerous one, designed to punish elected and administration officials who are working diligently to protect American jobs from foreign criminals.
Then Dodd says that the White House and Congress should call on the companies to stop the protests.
It is our hope that the White House and the Congress will call on those who intend to stage this “blackout” to stop the hyperbole and PR stunts and engage in meaningful efforts to combat piracy.”
The sheer lack of self awareness on display here is staggering. Dodd, for his part, has been a long time defender of SOPA and has even taken a lenient stance when it comes to the rampant censoring of the Internet by China.
Now I want every website to go dark tomorrow, not just Wikipedia.


















We need to all head over and give Dodd a message. What a douche bag!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYou want a solution? Force the movie studios and record labels to effectively secure their media. Don't limit our free speech because they're lazy and do nothing but whine and throw lawyers at their problems.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis guy wins the irony award of the decade. Censor the protestors. Protesting is abuse of power. Protesting is damaging.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is a clear example of "old fart" thinking. Unfortunately, the leaders of the world today are old farts that didn't grow up in the rapidly technological environment we have today. They have no idea what the Internet is about - they are stuck in the 1970's.
And it also didn't help that technological development has been speeding up as well. They just simply can't keep up with the change and are panicking - which results in ridiculous policy making (i.e. SOPA/PIPA).
How can you convince the older generation, that sits on the top of government and companies, that they no longer can make the best decisions? How do we get them to acknowledge that?
Because everyone knows.... old farts are stubborn as hell.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIf I want to shut down a site I own (no matter if it has hundreds of thousands / millions of users) for a cause, I will do it, and there is nothing illegal in that.
If after that the people doesn't want to return because they don't trust the site, its their problem. If the financial backing doesn't want to keep support, then I'll try to pay their 'loses' and move on.
Shutting down a site/censoring stuff isn't coercing people with fear to not support the law, its showing them the real face of things once it gets passed.
Some are saying that websites aren't covered by the first ammendment, so they can't have freedom of speech. But then, there are big companies that are treated as persons...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYa, the $100 million coming from the entertainment industry isn't an "abuse of power" at all is it. Come on...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeChris Dodd's deep connection with the MPAA is such a complete and blatant conflict of interest. I don't even see why he should be allowed to influence congress on the subject.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhat an idiot. He cares more about the harm from the blackouts rather than the SOPA bill itself. The SOPA bill is FAR more detrimental than the blackouts. I'm glad these blackouts will give some awareness to the issue at hand.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like