I’m not afraid to admit that I’ve found myself completely confused by the Stop Online Piracy Act, better known as SOPA. Politicians bank on Internet users being confused about the act as well, so it’s time to brush up on your SOPA knowledge.
One awesome (and anonymous) person decided to put together a short but sweet Google Doc called “SOPA For Dummies” and it cleared some things up for me, hopefully it will do the same for you.
Here’s an excerpt:
SOPA explicitly states that companies will be liable for everything their users post. Sites like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Reddit, Wikipedia, or any sites that allow user generated content CANNOT exist under these laws. Immediately after this bill is passed, you will see the media mafia (MPIAA, RIAA, etc) replacing websites like Wikipedia with commercialized encyclopedia software. Mainstream media outlets will not cover this bill because they are the ones lobbying for it.
And for your reading pleasure, here is the entire thing:


















Dear "Sopa for Dummie" writer...stealing a video game over the internet IS the same as jacking it off the shelf at the store...smh
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe Presidentz
not really.. stealing a physical disc would cost money, them saying they "lose" money from a pure digitial copy is why i agree with people stealing/pirating
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe Presidentz
i wouldnt be such an advocate if they didnt put a monetary value on it the way they do
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI don't support SOPA but hypocritical Google imposes SOPA on its users by requiring us to use real names, impeding our right to truly free speech and stomping on the primacy of the individual. Google wants its cake and eat it to. You and me are the cake and we are being eaten. Google doesn't want to have to police its search results or who it sells ads to because of the enormous burden it would place on the very technology a search engine uses yet they have no problem imposing an enormous burden on its users who are forced to self-censor and police their true thoughts and freedom of speech and expression when posting how they really feel about issues. I want the good with the bad. I want meaningful discourse. I want to relinquish the chains of injustice and free information from its imprisonment. You can't do that with big brother, big employer, or some psycho who doesn't agree with you being able to stalk you in real life by doing a simple Bing search of your real name.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWow. Amazing how many people believe everything bloggers put out there, without actually getting facts. SOPA for Dummies is riddled with inaccuracies, and falsehoods. Ex: - the excerpt listed above. Total BS. SOPA would not affect Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Wikipedia, etc.; because none of these are "Dedicated" to committing crime. See Section 103.a.1.b of the bill. And stop being mindless drones.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likestevemcqueen The rebel without a cause makes a good point about bloggers: full of junk, half-truths, trolls, lies, propaganda, fear mongering, and misdirection. Sort of like the few major newspapers of excellence that are barely surviving in the US. When I compare the NYTs front page of today to twenty years ago, it looks like People magazine.
I have gone over the SOPA in its current form,and just like the so called “Patriot Act” it’s all in the definition, interpretation and application of the nomenclature. Unless you believe that corporations “own” the ideas they ‘buy’, creating a monopoly, or you “own” your residence, while paying a bank a monthly mortgage, maintaining their home, insuring it, etc., you would think that SOPA makes infinite sense. Just as much sense as all the homeowners who were tossed out of their homes by the banks. Surprise.
Ultimately, why do we need SOPA? With the ability to close down any website the DOJ deems in violation, and a Supreme Court that thinks corporations are people, who will benefit from SOPA? That’s the question we should be asking. If this site, or Daily Kos, or Dissent are understood by the clowns in power in this country to be ‘dedicated’ to the commission of crime, without indictment and trial, will use this bill, if passed, to silence any threat against their ever increasing power.
In the absence of a clear and dangerous threat to the commonwealth arrest for thought crimes are around the corner, this discussion would be suspect, and this site could be shut down until some determination by someone in DOJ makes a
call. Re-read ‘1984.’
There are mindless drones on the web, to be sure. That doesn’t make SOPA any less of a threat to our few remaining civil liberties. There are infinite futures, but only one history. Look at its trend since 1980: a steady expansion of the power of a very few, the more powerful the oligarchs become, the more entrenched they become.
If you are going to be a rebel, have a cause.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWell written Adin. And thoughtful. Unfortunately, I can't agree with your conspiratorial premise.
I once again question whether you actually read the bill. It isn't ambiguous at all, and clearly states who would be targeted for prosecution. There is no reasoned expectation for "definition, interpretation and application of the nomenclature".
The intention of the bill is not to place liberties in jeopardy; in fact it does just the opposite. It protects consumers as much as it protects innovators, artists, entrepreneurs, and businesses. Consider that my cause.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAn example: I bought my niece UGG boots from a website (Chinese store hosted on US servers). Unfortunately, the boots were counterfeit - both my niece and I were victims. The hosting company was notified, but did nothing. SOPA would have allowed the DOJ to shut down this hosting company, not because they hosted the criminal enterprise's website; nor because they didn't take proactive measures to insure that the website was legitimate; BUT because they intentionally disregarded evidence that their customer was committing a crime, and continued to aid this activity knowingly. This is no different from current laws that protect the liberties that you say you cherish.
It is fashionable among the young, to find a cause to champion - to rally with masses, attack the "established" (to me that means average, hard working people), and beat the drums of righteousness. It's just unfortunate that this more often than not, means ignoring facts, disseminating falsehoods, and ..... impairing the liberties of others that disagree with you.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likestevemcqueen UGGs? Are you serious? Yeah, some dispute with an on line retailer is important. In the meantime while you are whining about UGGs, big pharma is monoplozing and driving up the cost of medicine to the point where health care will solely be within the providence of the wealthy, as employers and employees can no longer obtain health care. We are willing to trade barrels of oil for rivers of blood in a war with Iran. You need a new pair of UGGs like you need another pencil. SOPA is just one manifestation that adds to the increasing wealth disparity. You really think DOJ cares about your little UGGs? I don’t cherish any liberties. I assert my own liberty and pay the price. This country had laws that made human beings property, that denied women the right to vote, we signed treaties and contracts with native Americans, that were unilaterally negated when we decided that greed would trump honesty. Property rights, intellectual rights, it’s all a racket to transfer wealth and power to the gangs of thugs who live inside their bubbles. But, like all the self-absorbed arrogant clowns out there, end up like Mussolini, hung upside down by the heals in a gas station, like pieces of meat with eyes.
I said I read the bill as introduced, yet you call me a liar. You should be careful about that, Slim. You walk on thin ice when you think you can hide behind an anonymous screen name and imply I am a liar. It’s the mark of a coward. I’ve wasted too much time on you and you UGGs, twinkle toes.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likestevemcqueen hey jackass for those of us taht make a living with online business SOPA would kill us. With any ecommerce site out there that has comp on and off usa soil would be stomped out overnight. All our competitors would need to do is file BS claims and we are done. There is nothing positive about SOPA so don't try and give any positive support. WTF is wrong with you?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likesopasucksstevemcqueen If I could understand what you are saying, I’ll play close attention. I’ve been wrong more often than I’ve been right. So drop the name calling, and clarify for me how your e-com business would be “stomped out overnight? What kind of claims? How would you be “done“? Why aren’t your competitors wiped out by the same strategy that you describe? The real big boys don’t need SOPA to do that. That’s only part of the reason for SOPA: to keep the big boys big, to ensure they can wipe out competition. As I said earlier, it’s the application, nomenclature, and lack of judicial oversight that has allowed the “Patriot Act” to give the authority to suspend habeas corpus at the whim of the president, any president. SOPA falls into the exact same category of law. I wonder how a Pres Gingrich would use SOPA and the Patriot Act. I don’t expect anyone to be able to see into the distant future, but all this can happen in weeks
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likestevemcqueen doesnt take but 1 link for these greedy companies to consider a site "dedicated" tard...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeImagine typing in all of those IP addresses instead of easy to remember domain names? forget that.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like"Mainstream media outlets will not cover this bill because they are the ones lobbying for it."
Actually, the American Society of News Editors opposes SOPA. Journalism is at risk when whole sites can get taken down with minimal judicial oversight.
http://asne.org/portals/0/publications/public/SOPA-letter.pdf
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeUsing the same logic, telephone companies will be responsible for the acts of terror and crime by the people that used their services to organise them and governments will be responsible for the crimes committed on the roads by the users. Effectively this law sets a precedent for every manufacturer or service provider will be responsible for their products misuse. Whatever happened to personal responsibility?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhen exactly did I move to China?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOh, boy. I guess I'd better start downloading even more music from Youtube before this SOPA thing comes to a head. I get most of my '80's and 90's music from Youtube that has been posted by those generous souls who are willing to share their rare and no longer available vinyl recordings.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAlright, this SOPA is a genuinely scary proposition, and there's a lot going back & forth here on it. But all the exchange so far is about opinions. Where can we get something definitive on what we can do to rally against it? Where do we go and what do we do to stop this thing that will end our ability to have even this kind of exchange?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMegaCorps can rip consumers off only if consumers accept the rape of greed that is a parasite destroying us. These Corps will only listen when consumers say 'no more' and eject the unrestrained greed of the arrogant criminals. Don't whine about it. Notify the retailer what you think of their practices, take your business elsewhere, and prove it by closing your account.
DO SOMETHING and stop complaining. If it inconveniences you, tough it out and act with some courage. Believe me, you'll survive. I did it with 4 big time retailers. They tried to buy me off with $20 discounts and slick customers reps. I told them it was too late for all that. I was gone forever as a customer and then I blanketed the Internet with the details of what happened. Two of the four eventually changed their policies. If we don't force the change by simply saying, 'no more,' it will continue and get worse. They will never get me back as a customer.
We are responsible for the muggings we are subjected to. You only have two choices: go after the retailers with a vengeance, or be complicit in your own robbery.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConsumers can change the world! I am moving my domains from Go Daddy on Monday!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likethe entire internet is based on "user generated content", even people who write html or whatever not just comments and "edits".
no one can deny internet is more powerful than tv, but with crap like this it is one step closer to being just as dumb as tv. this can easily lead to individuals having to get permission from your ISP to send anything..
so internet will become this COMPLETELY commercial, pre-approved place for fakers just like all tv channels.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeit`s free...
--~~~~manolo56/J.Scipt
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likefor all Users...
FreeDOM--~~~~
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSo people can't post rubbish and lies online without being held accountable anymore? Fantastic!
Thanks, I'm off to lobby politicians to vote for it!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOne comment on SOPA for dummies; the writer sources a 1985 document on copyright infringement for a 21st century problem? And he is a CS student? Please. In 1985 you didn't have the potential for perfect digital copies posted in a medium available in almost any home globally.
Don't mistake me; SOPA is bad politics, but citing a ruling that could have more to do with VHS copies (inferior copies) of television programming in the 1980's is a poor effort.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe real issue is in intellectual property rights. When what is copied online, without remuneration to the creator of said property, may be downloaded as a perfect digital copy over and over, you remove a key part to the "risk / reward" feature individuals and companies engage in when creating that property.
Bluntly, no one pays for a cr*p product and no one works for free. If I make something of value and people want it, I have the right to ask and deserve to be paid for it.
SOPA goes too far and in the wrong direction.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMatthew Nachazel
Intellectual property rights are a false construct designed to create new law in order to control, seize and profit from things that cannot be owned. Can you really on an idea?
It is the same ploy as ‘property rights.’ How many people who thought they ‘owned’ their homes, had residences seized by the banks? They found out very quickly who ‘the law,’ created by and for the wealthy, ‘owned’ their residence.
Rent, lease, but never buy. You are only making it easy for the banks to rob you. The tax incentives associated with home ownership, are off set by the cost you pay every day to protect the investment of the banks. Wake up and educate yourself, God’s sake.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likemarco3xMatthew Nachazel
Guys, this debate can be summarized even simpler: We would probably not even have this "conversation" if SOPA is passed. Anything can be passed as being piracy, even the fact that you post a link to an article which happens to have another link to a download site. SOPA is dangerous and infringes not only liberty of speech, but liberty as a whole. The circle is shrinking ...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis SOPA bill is absolutely ridiculous! You would think our representatives would actually read & understand these things before voting for them... they get paid plenty to! Seems like this bill is just giving the government complete control over domain names... with a click of a mouse they'll be able to shutdown any or all domains or even forward them to some public service announcement... almost like an emergency broadcast system for the web-based internet. This bill will do nothing to stop online piracy! WE NEED SOME YOUNGER MINDS IN CONGRESS!!! CC: christina lulich & jacob gabriel
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJonathan Lulichchristina lulichjacob gabriel This bill is designed more for the government to control what is said about them than to stop any piracy. The piracy issue is just the trojan horse they are using. This is where they are exposed now on the internet. And they are intimidating ISPs and domain companies to support them. They know well what they are doing. They read this well believe me.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Twitter
@rlopezrobles thanks for the mention
itsmrwave I get the basic idea..
RT earthXplorer Confused by the Stop Online Piracy Act? Here’s #SOPA For Dummies - http://t.co/GiOy3fz7
debs thanks a lot!
ohhhkae your tweets are always so useful lol I love you and hope you're feeling better <3
nicollegrace aww thanks love..I like to tweet neat things that arent pointless crap haha ! I'm feeling better:-)
nicollegrace miss you!!
CSicilz interesting. I still don't get it.
annitss muchas gracias :) enseguida lo checo!! abrazo
sandybell08 espero te sea útil, hay videito chistoso q no recuerdo cómo se llama, si lo encuentro t lo paso, abrazo!
annitss si la verdad es que ya había escuchado sobre el tema varias veces pero tengo q leer mucho sobre eso e investigar!! gracias :D
michael_neely Want to know how me and many others became our own boss and made 4k a month in 3 months time? mymoneyjournalsite .com
JimmyCaylor stop posting links fruitball and go enjoy christmas! :)
gercograndia HealthEugene HELP STOP FLUORIDE sign my petition to stop fluoride in america's water http:\/\/t.co\/OldilMcd
sugarrae Thank you. Reading now...
MzYummyDread :-) *waves*
blkbruce_wayne hi boo
MzYummyDread u want me to shopping with u? Lol I'll keep u safe.
blkbruce_wayne lol you going to wear you uniform? lol
MzYummyDread do I need to? We gonna Skype later? I got a lil beard now ha