I have frequently been informed of my naiveté on this matter but I am going to say this anyway: I think the whole privacy scare regarding companies like Facebook and Google is overblown and way out of proportion. I, for one, don’t care how much these companies know about me and how they use all that data.
At its f8 conference last week, Facebook unveiled the new Timeline feature, which takes all the information you have ever entered on the social networking website and puts it on a redesigned profile that is chronologically arranged by year and goes back to your birth. More controversially, it announced additions to Open Graph which will encourage you to share a lot more data on Facebook through third-party applications.
Google got into the social networking game in a big way with the launch of Google+ this year and the service has recently opened its doors to everyone on the Web. Google+, combined with all the other popular online destinations owned by the company, means that Google probably has even more data about you than Facebook, and a lot of people are very concerned about what both these companies are doing with all that information.
I, not so much.
Like I said before, I am aware that my thoughts on privacy are often viewed as naive and are probably not shared by the majority of the people involved in tech media. But I do not think that companies like Facebook and Google (and Apple, Microsoft, Sony, Twitter and every other well-known company that offers online services) are out to steal your data or invade your privacy.
What we shouldn’t be worrying about…
What people seem to skip over when discussing privacy-related issues on the Internet is that there is a big difference between a person being privy to your private information and a computer algorithm going over your data. If you post your location on Facebook and see an ad the next day for a product in your neighbourhood, that’s Facebook using your data to show you targeted advertising. That’s the sort of “privacy violation” that companies like Facebook and Google indulge in.
However, if you post a status update on Facebook that you do not intend for someone to see, but it shows up in their news feed anyway, that would be a violation of your privacy in the sense that we understand it in the real world. Or if someone at Google is going through your emails as they pour into your Gmail inbox (as hilariously depicted in a spoof video by Microsoft) and then calling your business associates or friends to tell them about it, that would be an invasion of privacy.
To my understanding, your privacy is only invaded when there are real-world implications of your private information on these networks being shared with people you actually know. Quite frankly, no one at Facebook or Google is interested in your personal life and they have no incentive whatsoever to make it public.
When Apple was embroiled in the iPhone location-tracking controversy earlier this year, just reading the articles written on the subject made me chuckle. As if Apple had anything to gain from knowing your location! What were people afraid of anyway? That the company was going to send sales reps after its Windows-using customers while they were sitting in a park and try to sell them on a Mac?
…and what we should.
What we do need to worry about are the various features and settings implemented by social networks in such a way that we might unintentionally reveal private information to people we know. If you tag someone in a private photo on Facebook and that enables all of that person’s friends to see it, then that’s something that users of the site need to be educated about.
Even though I am so carefree about my privacy, I don’t publish my location to Twitter with my tweets. I don’t want people to know where exactly I live, just in case someone decides to come after me with a pickaxe. But even if I did, I wouldn’t care that Twitter knew where I lived. In fact, I routinely allow apps on my iPhone to use my location data in order to make themselves more useful to me.
The point I am trying to make is that, at the end of the day, social networks are just tools of expression and a means for us to communicate with others. It is important that we be mindful of what we share and whom we share it with on these networks, even more than in real life.
However, when people start writing lengthy missives about how Google has so much information about you that it is going to take over the world, it makes me wonder how much of it has a basis in reality and how much of it is just unreasonable paranoia. Facebook’s invasion on your privacy is only limited to the extent that helps it make money. As long as you don’t mind looking at a few ads that seem to know you really well, I think you can relax; Mark Zuckerberg is not out to get you.
[Image courtesy of Zurijeta / Shutterstock.com.]


















Facebook has bugs that reveal private information. I have two facebook accounts so that is how I know because sometimes I check the other facebook and see that information that has been set to private is accidentally in public- right now this includes friendslist and some posts that appeared public when I changed the old facebook format to timeline. I had to commit the transformation to get rid of the posts (The transformation where you can see timeline by only you and not others until you have the timeline setting automatically permantly set due to a date or you manually setting it.) Another bug as of today is that even my block contacts can see the friends we share if they look at our old messages or note's comments.
Privacy can be important to me because there are some crazy people I have met in my lifetime unfortunately. :( Another thing is that Facebook does read your data - they even suggest screenshots and the url of your data when you want to report a bug.
However, despite all this- I am caught between using facebook to communicate with people on a personal level versus my privacy. Facebook does enrich my personal life because things can be shared so easily, but I get paranoid that it may some day damage my professional life AND personal life. :( I ask myself why this isn't an obvious choice- I guess I'm hoping I just being paranoid and that everyone else like you have a better idea of the whole situation.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeCon Ster
Oops, I shouldn't say crazy; I mean personal very unpleasant people :)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI was working for a Russian company for 3 last years and you probably have to know that exit from Russian business is a tough game: it is common practice to minimize the costs of dismissal and they use everything they can potentially find. I have spoken to a security person who confessed: 2 times they had to deal with tough employee exit during the last 3 years and in both cases they have used Facebook personal info to build the case and create pressure..
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis article needs more clarification and understanding so I will state 2 real-life events revolving around Social Networks.
1) The Google Revenge :- A time not long ago, a lone developer who worked at a prestigious company called Google, gave in to the power he possessed and started misusing it. Apparently he had issues with a kid and he used his powers granted by Google to make that kid's already tough life,like all troubled teenage lives are, more harrowing.Source:- http://techcrunch.com/2010/09/14/google-engineer-spying-fired/
2) The Facebook Porn :- This is real-life experience which at this time of typing happened a few hours ago to a friend of mine. As usual he was surfing on Facebook and not surprisingly he came across a vid link (NSFW). It seemed legit like all the others do and I gave him the go-ahead to click that link though being aware of the nefarious purpose the said link held under its code. The link looked like a vid and when clicked upon directed my buddy to a survey page made to resemble Facebook.- A dead end. The end result? I knew what had happened and advised my friend to pay a visit to his FB wall for a surprise. You see, this friend of mine is not as web-experienced as us, the readers of TNW and like many people he is unaware of the potential danger internet holds. So coming back to his wall, he was shocked to see that the NSFW material has been posted to his wall. Yes, you may say that we are liable because we agreed to give the app the permission to access the account and yes you may rebut that we knew the NSFW contents of the post and we should have been cautious but we were not adviced that the app would post NSFW on our wall!. Now pause for a moment and think:- a naive user tricked into clicking a post that piqued his curiosity will now probably live with guilt and a hint of shame for some time because his family members might have seen it, his friends must have seen it. To top it off, he comes from a conservative family, Image the repercussions he could face. All this because the apps on Facebook are not monitored unlike in Apple.
Coming back to Aayush's carefree view about the location-based privacy, I would like to add that just like the controversy at Google, even an employee at Apple could misuse this! Instead of blatantly writing about how one is "Secured" from privacy breach, here at TNW, the post should have been more focused on "How to safeguard one's privacy in social networks- A guide for Dummies!" Aayush Arya I do not mean to target you. I just want the people to know what one day, they could experience.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLike the Patriot Act, online privacy is an issue of principle in most cases, but FB's ever-decreasing privacy can actually endanger one's safety in certain circumstances. The issue with FB's most recent changes (Timeline, etc) is that users did not consent to that level of sharing when they agreed to FB's privacy policy and TOS. (Check out the link below to see how the company's privacy policies have changed over the years, THEN tell me you don't believe they're profiting from our information).
But back to the safety issue: I've recently stumbled upon some widespread and seriously shady activities that Facebook has refused to address despite multiple complaints over several years. Things like friend requests (and suggestions) being sent from the accounts of people who did not send them (see second reference below). Not only can such things be embarrassing, they may pose a real threat to your safety. Scorned lovers, loss of livelihood, child predators and unwanted legal problems are just the beginning. What good are privacy settings if your stalker has access to everything you post? At this point, it will take a serious and potentially fatal event for FB to acknowledge these issues...and even then only if a lawsuit or major media event forces their hand.
Bottom line: it's incredibly naive to believe Facebook and similar sites have your best interests at heart. It makes no more sense than Monsanto's claims that genetic modification of food is done for the purpose of "feeding the world". Profit is what drives any corporation, and only the threat of LOSING profits will ever force them to change. Complaining about the site by posting a disgruntled status update while continuing to use FB is counter-intuitive and accomplishes nothing.
(Copy + paste "Facebook's Eroding Privacy Policy" and "Is Facebook Making Friend Requests Without Your Permission?" into Google for references. Can't link to them here.)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSeriously? You think facebook's algorithms aren't reading what all your're typing on the site? I think you do know how context based ads work and how you get an instant ad relevant to what comment you just posted on a friend's status update on facebook's sidebar. Thought this isn't much related to privacy invasion *that much*, but I had to write this to clear the point. Secondly, you spun the whole story around "location based privacy". That's just the tip of the iceberg. If I went to anyone's profile few weeks back, I couldn't dig much deeper into their life history. Maybe because I didn't know them from day 1 of their birth or maybe I didn't pay attention to every single update they did. But now? I have everything right on my fingertips. A lot more information than I can actually have imagined getting in those previous weeks. Talking about newest additions, the ticker, there is no way to disable my updates on what all I do on the site to appear on the ticker. THIS is what I call privacy breach. If I don't want other's to know every single thing I'm doing on the site, I should have an option to turn it off. But I'm not. And this is just one thing about the creepy timeline Zuck has introduced. On other stand, wallposts got disabled *magically* when I switched to the new timeline and all my friendlists were automatically hidden though I didn't even touch any settings. Talk aboout facebook *not interested* in touching my privacy settings? Guess it did. I don't see a singly point of writing this article. Rather, this should be on a personla diary on "How I don't care about privacy issues because I don't tweet my location". Facebook privacy is a lot more complex issue. And not to forget, the recent "frictionless" sharing that was introduced around facebook apps. Enough Said.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@Rishabh Agarwal Your argument holds no merit. You're blaming default settings as privacy violations. When the time line came out it reset the privacy settings. It's a completely new profile so with it, new privacy settings. Facebook is all about sharing, Mark Zuckerberg has openly stated that. If the are changes in Facebook that you cant change and are effecting you in ways that you don't feel comfortable with, don't use Facebook. It's that simple. It's called a social network for a reason.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDan Williams Absolutely. And I can make complete sense out of your comment. Change my settings for a brand new profile look *wheeeeee* is what I'm concerned about. This is my privacy breach. I know what's social networking all about. I was also talking about this article and the points, the author failed to mention, though he doesn't seem to care about privacy issues.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeRishabh Agarwal Excellently put. Can't agree more.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like"However, when people start writing lengthy missives about how Google has so much information about you that it is going to take over the world, it makes me wonder how much of it has a basis in reality and how much of it is just unreasonable paranoia."
Unreasonable paranoia? What the above statement fails to acknowledge is that the "reality" that these more radical missives don't supposedly have a basis in has already been completely altered by these companies invading your data privacy. I won't call your position naive. You said enough people have told you that already. Not only are these companies taking and using your data in ways that invade your privacy, they are structuring your online "experience" around knowledge from these invasions in a way as to direct you to reveal more data. Invading one's privacy doesn't have to involve someone misusing personal information in a personal manner. The more sinister invasion, actually, is when it's in the name of shaping your very existence. In the end, that is "taking over the world" with data, not destruction.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like_ericwalker I’m sorry, I don’t see it that way. I share on Facebook what I want to. How is it “reshaping my very existence”? It is providing a platform for me to mingle with my people online and my sharing of things there is helping me get better recommendations, help when I need it and entertainment, among other things. It also keeps me connected with far more people than I usually would. How is any of this hurting me?
In fact, even their ads, due to the leverage they gain from my data, are more potentially useful to me than they would be otherwise. The ads themselves are non-intrusive, on both Facebook and Google.
These companies are not “making me” do anything. I choose to do whatever I do on these networks.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe one big issue you have pointed out is that WHAT PRIVACY MEANS in today's world?
Does sharing every bit of your life with your friends violate privacy? Does the companies using the data with your permission violate privacy? We have to think about it!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@Sherman Lau The thing with Facebook is, they tell you everything they intend to do with your information. It's right in the ToS that you skip and automatically click "Accept" on. It's not like they didn't tell us.. We just chose to ignore the way they told us what they were doing with our information because it is "inconvenient".
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDan Williams@sherman
@ D.W. You are right, people choose to ignore those important information and skip "the decision making process" due to the inconvenience. This passive sharing thing makes people completely unaware of what they are showing to the world in this global network, which can be very very dangerous.
The group talks about issues regrading preservation and privacy of digital memory. Have a look.
http://www.facebook.com/memoryBACK
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSherman LauDan Williams@sherman One important point most people forget is to read the fine print present in the Privacy Policy or any policy at that matter. Blame cannot be directed to a single side. Both FACEBOOK and its USERS have to be blamed for any issues with Privacy. However big the responsibility may lie with the end-user, its the brand/company or in this case Facebook's best interest to point out these issues to users in layman terms. Today I stumbled upon a site that made me chuckle, not because there was something wrong in it but the objective behind which the website was built around. I am talking about simple.wikipedia.com. I thought WIKIPEDIA was the simplest and when I compared an article for my subject theory in both the sides, I found stark differences in terminology and the style. What i am saying is People should be made aware of the repercussions of their actions.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like