Apple has passed the landmark of one million iPad sales in South Korea, where its tablet device is a considerable distance ahead of rival Samsung’s efforts on its home turf.
The statistic, which is reported by the Korea Herald, makes Apple the country’s top tablet vendor, with sales of the original iPad and iPad 2 estimated to account for 70-80 percent of the nation’s market. Perhaps Samsung needs to work on its advertising in the country, the latest of which is inspired by Apple but seemingly not working on Korean gadget buyers.
Tablets are a growing sector in Korea’s technology space, where smartphones are still becoming established among mainstream consumers. However, Apple is said to have seen an encouraging 700,000 iPad devices sold last year, since introducing the iPad in April, and momentum has increased in the new year as it has gone on to hit seven figures.
Local press sources, cited by the Korea Herald, suggest that there may in fact be more iPads active in Korea. The official figure accounts for devices sold in the country alone, however the actual number could be “far more” due to early adopters who bought devices from overseas channels before it launched in the country.
Further details reveal that the WiFi-only versions of the iPad are the most popular, accounting for two-thirds of all sales, suggesting that, for now at least, most Koreans avoid running the device on carriers’ data networks.
The gulf in sales will frustrate Samsung, which has always taken pride in performing well in homeland. Indeed, the company is so sensitive to the Korean market that it reneged on plans to fight the launch of the iPhone 4S there.
Tablets have been a key part of the international legal disputes between Apple and Samsung with Germany the most recent battlefield. A German court last week dismissed Apple’s attempts to push for a sales ban on the modified Galaxy Tab 10.1N, which itself was introduced to avoid a sales ban following a successful legal challenge from Apple.
Recent developments follow Samsung’s unsuccessful attempt to overturn a ban on the original Galaxy Tab, which it was looking to sell again in Germany. Apple was the first to up the ante in the European country this year, as it filed new lawsuits against 10 smartphones and 5 tablets in Germany in January.
Both companies are set to introduce new tablets to increase the competition in the space in 2012. Samsung is rumoured to be announcing an 11.6-inch device, which will become the world’s largest tablet, at some point this year, while Apple is strongly tipped to launch the iPad 3 next month.


















Worldwide Android tablet sales has overtaken the iPad. Samsung sells more smartphones in the USA, in Europe and worldwide than Apple. That's just Samsung, add to that all the other smartphone makers, Android has been selling more than 3x more than iPhone for more than a year and a half now. Android is just about to sell 4x more smartphones per day worldwide than iPhone. That is why Apple is crying and desperate and suing Android companies for bogus patents such as Apple inventing auto-correct (word processing apps doing that since 1970ies), Apple inventing creating links in the browser with a phone number (tons of SIP and Skype doing it since the last century), Apple inventing slide-to-unlock (that's the biggest joke in the world!), Apple inventing providing word suggestions when using a keyboard (has been part of word processors since the 1970ies). Apple never invented anything.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likecharbax You're an idiot.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likelfc You're a genius.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likecharbax While Samsung is making some money from their Android devices (even if very little), the rest of the industry in losing money. Apple brings home about 80% of the total profits for the entire industry. Giving away more phones (at a loss) than Apple sells at a profit is not a metric to be proud of.
As to inventing, first, Apple has invented a lot. To deny that is to show rank ignorance, at best, and total stupidity at worst. However, patent fights are not about who invented anything. They are about who owns the rights to a particular idea. I have mixed feelings on them myself, but the worlds rules are what they are for today and Apple is playing by those rules. They are certainly showing more integrity than Larry Page did by sitting on Apple's Board and participating in all the iPhone strategy talks, while collecting information to take back to Google for the use of competing with Apple. He is lucky no one put him in jail over that. Nations go to war over that kind of behavior.
Anyway, seems to me that you are the one doing the crying. Apple seems to busy checking on their profit to have time for crying.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJ Scott Andersoncharbax That is completely false. The Android industry is making hundreds of billions of dollars of profit per year for Google, for the manufacturers, for the carriers and networking industry. Android is providing billions of dollars of economic development in China, South Korea, Japan, Europe, the rest of the world. Android is powering about 12 MVNO carriers in the USA. All 4 major US Carriers are making MORE money selling Android then they are selling the iPhone. Google makes mountains of cash on Android by those 500 million new Android users last year all signed up for a Google account if they hadn't one already that means much increased use of Google search, Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube etc for these users. That means tons more ads displayed and tons more to be displayed as soon as local advertising services work better.
In fact, Android is making FAR MORE Revenue and Profits worldwide than Apple is doing on the iPhone. That, even as Android phones are 20x cheaper than the iPhone. In China people buy $50 Android phones that are unlocked. In the USA, people pay $3000 for an iPhone on a 2-year contract. Yet, Android companies make combined far more profits anyway.
Apple NEVER invented anything. They are just stealing from other companies, Apple never thought to invent anything themselves, never. And Apple is NEVER going to win any patent lawsuit, never. It's simply impossible. Basicaly Apple is desperate. All those bogus software patents are imminently going to be discarded, cancelled, dismissed by the worls courts. You can't patent multi-touch when it was invented in 1972. You can't patent auto-correct when it was invented in 1970. You can't patent word suggestions when it was invented in 1970. You can't patent slide-to-unlock when it was invented in 1950. You can't patent search when it was invented in 1930. You can't patent linking to a phone number when thousands of companies have been doing it since more than 10 years before the first iPhone was released. Apple is crying and desperate in their corner.
It was Eric Schmidt who was on the board of directors at Apple, the reasoning was for Apple to steal all the ideas from Google, not the other way around. Eric Schmidt would tell Apple everything Google was doing and in exchange Apple was hiding everything from Eric Schmidt even as he was on the board of directors. In fact Eric Schmidt was not informed about anything relating to the iPhone. Android was purchased by Google in 2005, and work on Android started 6-7 years before the first iPhone was released.
Apple is crying because they know they can't make as much profits in the near future. They are simply trying to milk their cow for as long as possible.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likecharbax You caught my one mistake – Schmidt not Page. As to the rest you are truly delusional. Google is making money. Samsung is making some money. The rest of the handset makers are not. The carriers? They make money no matter whose hardware is being run.
Perhaps you should take a look at what Google purchase when they bought Android. At first, it looked like a Windows phone – when Windows Mobile seemed to be winning. Then, when Blackberry started winning, Android morphed to looked like a Blackberry. Then, Android morphed again, after the iPhone was successfully released – to look like...wait for it...the iPhone. And...yes, Schmidt did sit in on iPhone meetings before Google had announced to anyone that they would be releasing a competitor to the iPhone. And how would Apple steal anything from Google. Google is a search/advertising company, at the time - still mostly that way today. Did Steve Jobs sit in on high-level Google board meetings and listen to their strategy talks? No. Did Steve Jobs use a Reality Distortion Field to forcefully pull all Google's secrets from Eric Schmidt? No. However, Eric Schmidt did sit in on Apple's iPhone plans while he knew his company was building a competing product.
As to the patents, the courts will determine what you can and cannot patent and who owns them. As I said, I have mixed feelings about patents. Let this one rest.
For profit, Apple has been on a very long profit run and it shows no signs of slowing. I'll not predict future profits for anyone...especially in the tech market where disruptive technology can show up at any time. To do so is foolish in the extreme.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJ Scott Anderson Carriers pay less than $400 average per Android customer. Carriers pay more than $650 average per iPhone customer. Carriers get to keep a much larger chunk of the money to themselves when promoting/selling Android and not the iPhone!
The whole Android ecosystem is making hundreds of billions of dollars per year on Android. All the Android makers combined have millions of employees at work thanks to Android, all making salaries, feeding their families, feeding the economy. All the Android companies were failing near bankruptcy before Android, and now they are all about 5x larger/better more profitable companies. Sony-Ericsson, HTC, LG mobile, Huawe mobile, ZTE mobile, Samsung mobile, all those and many more were near bankruptcy and going nowhere before they started using Android, now they are all winning market share, they are all growing, they are all making tons more money than they would without Android.
Apple has been on a VERY SHORT profit run. Just a few years ago, in 2001, Apple was near-bankruptcy. Apple ONLY made profits because of the iPod in 2002-2006 and ONLY from the iPhone for 2007-2011. Apple is ONLY making profits from the iPhone today. The iPad/Mac profits are less than 30% combined of Apple's profits today. Without the iPhone, Apple has no more profits coming. That is exactly the sign of Apple profits slowing. As Android phones are way better/cheaper, as carriers are all being pissed selling iPhone way overpriced, as manufacturers are all way pissed at giving Apple all the profits on hardware and working the slaves at slavery salaries and conditions, and most importantly as 99% of consumers are going to be satisfied paying $99 for a high-end Android phone unlocked with little to no pre-paid service price. I'm for example using SIP for unlimited free voice/im on my $87 dual-SIM Android phone for $8/month on pre-paid for the past 9 months. Quite rapidly Apple won't be able to make $500 profit per iPhone. That is how Apple's profits can quickly collapse.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikecharbaxJ Scott Anderson
Apple's profit is definitely on the higher side and it is because of the manufacturing process that Apple follows. The production of iPhone,iPad,Mac etc. is carried out in bulk, as ergonomics of the product category does not change; these products can be manufactured in bulk and this brings down the overall cost due to mass material procurement,standardization of software solution and its update, exact molding patterns used in manufacturing process etc. At the same time Apple does its manufacturing in Asia which brings down labor costs and set-up costs. Also it gives contracts to Indian companies like Wipro very secretively for their ERP software at relatively cheap cost compared to what they will pay for the same in the US or anywhere else; whereas for Android, different manufacturers like Samsung use Android with too many customizations in their software and hardware making it very difficult to manufacture devices in bulk and thus in turn increasing the cost of the product and reducing the profit margin.
Thus Apple gains substantial profit even if it sells the i-devices at comparable price with the industry standard. But still as Apple has that 'covetous' brand image, consumers are ready to pay some loyalty...
The conglomerate effect being a consistent mammoth profit for Apple which is hard to reproduce. But still nobody can predict the future. It might happen that Apple may not get $500 profit per iPhone as the industry standards will change.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeApple also continues to dominate Middle East Mobile Internet Usagehttp://english.nuqudy.com/General_Overview/Gulf/Middle_East_Mobile_-891
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like