One of the interesting facts we learned from the Steve Jobs biography is that he planned to revolutionize photography, and he may well have achieved that. Walter Isaacson wrote about Jobs, saying, “He had three things that he wanted to reinvent: the television, textbooks and photography. He really wanted to take these on.”
While diehard photographers will question just how much you can get done with an iPhone, there is no denying that the camera has steadily developed over time and, if you subscribe to the notion that the best camera is the one you have with you, the iPhone may well be the best camera in countless pockets around the world.
We can see just how much the iPhone camera has improved with each model thanks to Lisa Bettany of Camera+, who posted an interesting comparison of the various models starting with the original one, all the way up to the iPhone 4S.
You can see in her image below just how much the camera has improved and is very well a force to be reckoned with.
A photographer is only as good as the equipment he uses
In September, Nikon’s Facebook page was blasted with comments after a misguided post stating, “A photographer is only as good as the equipment he uses,” stirred up quite a bit of controversy.
If we were to play the devil’s advocate and pretend that the statement is true, where does that leave iPhone photographers? When it comes to smartphone photography, we can safely say that the iPhone 4S puts its users in a pretty good position, not only because of the quality of the camera, but also because of the huge variety of apps, and accessories, which photographers can take advantage of.
Besides the limitless photography apps available both for free and at a minimal price in the iTunes App Store, there is an incredible amount of interesting add-ons you can use with your iPhone, to enhance your iphoneography.
Add-on lenses like the Fisheye and Telephoto lenses won’t cost you more than $35, and the $25 Holga iPhone Lens Kit (reviewed here) will give you a ton more options. If you’re really serious about your iPhoneography, Photojojo’s SLR mount will set you back a hefty $249, but will allow you to use your existing lens set with your iPhone.
The very fact that these accessories have been created prove that Steve Jobs achieved exactly what he set out to do. While other smartphones might have better cameras, higher megapixels, and better lenses, for some reason, the innovation surrounding these products does not compare to the iPhone.
So the question is, can you really compare the iPhone camera to an SLR? Digital Camera Beginner put a Canon 500D to the test, alongside the iPhone 4S to discover how the cameras compare. The iPhone 4S held its own in most instances, and the final conclusion is an interesting one. If you’re not planning to kit yourself out with a bunch of different lenses, and are more likely to set your SLR to auto and let the camera do all of the work – the iPhone 4S will more than meet your needs.
If on the other hand you want more control over how your images appear, the iPhone 4S will only make for a somewhat frustrating experience.
The real comparison to be made is not with an SLR but rather with digital point and shoot cameras, and this is when the iPhone 4s is a clear winner. Not only is the camera quality impressive, in the age of social media and (over)sharing, it couldn’t be easier to get your snaps straight from your phone onto Facebook, Twitter or any photo-sharing site your heart desires.
Has Instagram ruined photography?
Some might say that the iPhone has certainly reinvented photography but not for the better. With the rise of apps like Instagram, Hipstamatic, PicPlz and countless others, filtered smartphone photography has dominated social networks much in the same way that the iPhone has dominated Flickr.
The problem with apps like Instagram is that some people take photographs of things they normally wouldn’t, slap a filter on it, and think it’s fit for sharing. Whether this is Instagram’s fault or not really comes down to opinion. Would those people be just as likely to share photos taken in front of the bathroom mirror, photos of their breakfast, pets, and more?
They probably would be, but Instagram has certainly given them that vehicle which makes it sound like a good idea. That may be the main problem that Instagram poses – the vast disconnect between the actual and believed quality of the image.
Instagram’s power is in the fact that it creates a communal experience. Part of the allure is the filters, which are possibly among the very best available in any smartphone app, but what good are shared photos if no one is looking at them. Apps like Instagram create an opportunity to share images, but when we take a closer, more professional look at them, do they still meet the grade?
Foreign Policy certainly seems to think so. It published a series of photographs from Afghanistan taken by photographer Balazs Gardi using nothing more than his iPhone, loaded with the $0.99 app, Hipstamatic.
If Foreign Policy’s series of photos prove anything, it’s that, if put in the right pair of hands, or in the right location, the iPhone, together with apps like Instagram and Hipstamatic, can truly create stunning, artistic and lasting photography.
According to Flickr, the iPhone is best bar none
With each new handset, Apple’s iPhone has shot to the top of the list of the ‘most popular camera’ on Flickr. It happened with the iPhone 4, and, most recently with the iPhone 4S. In fact, if you look at the top 5 most popular cameraphones on Flickr, four out of five them belong to Apple.
The fact that the iPhone not only beats out all other smartphones, but also beats out both SLR and point-and-shoot cameras on Flickr gives us a very relevant piece of information on how the iPhone is being used as a camera.
Flickr continues to be a huge repository for creative commons images and is still popular among many photographers. But it isn’t all good news for Flickr. There has been not only a steady migration towards alternatives like 500px, some professional photographers like Thomas Hawk have also been very vocal about their disappointment, and rightfully so, with how stagnant Flickr has become as a service.
Flickr is a convenient option for getting photos straight from your iPhone to the Internet, and has dominated the photo-sharing space for years. Like Instagram, there’s a community. There are groups, users have built connections, and have developed a following.
For the purposes of someone who is sharing their day-to-day snaps taken using their phone, on the go, Flickr continues to meet their needs. For photographers who are concerned with how their photos are displayed, or are concerned with a certain standard of quality, Flickr is simply no longer the place to be.
By extension, the iPhone, while it can be used for more, is a great option for day-to-day photography, getting shots on the go, and sharing them online at the click of a button.
The iPhone takes on the Flip Video
The iPhone, and to a lesser extent, other smartphone brands, are slowing but surely digging into the point-and-shoot market. And this isn’t the only market that has been affected. With the iPhone’s impressive video capabilities, the iPhone 4 has already proven to be a formidable opponent to the Flip Video as was seen with the movie Apple of my Eye, shot and edited entirely on an iPhone 4.
Again as is the case with photography, users can shoot, edit and post impressive videos directly from their phones. When it comes to choosing between an iPhone and point-and-shoot camera, or a flip video, the convenience of having all of those tools in one device makes the decision a no-brainer, and in so doing, you’ll also save money from having to buy several gadgets.
The iPhone 4S is certainly just as, if not more, impressive as the iPhone 4, as is seen in the video below:
What do you think? Will the iPhone and other smartphones eventually do away with the need for point-and-shoot cameras? Did Apple redefine photography with the iPhone? Let us know in the comments.
If you’re looking for some tips on how to improve your smartphone photography, be sure to check out our guide.





















Don't get me wrong, I love my 3 Apple products but the piddly little camera on my iPhone 4 is beyond poor quality. What next, Apple DSLRs? I'll stick to my Nikon thanks.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHow timely. I just wrote an article pleading for someone to come disrupt the camera industry in an Apple-like fashion: http://aaronhockley.com/disrupt-camera-industry/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeso sick of this continuos homage to the iPhone. From a specs standpoint the hardware is far behind many Android devices..the credit should be going to instagram...hardware is a commodity and all the ingredients in all these smart phones come from the same 3 component manufacturers... 2 guesses what type of device the author of the article has....
Wake up...Galaxy Nexus and Galaxy S II destroy the iPhone 4S..on pretty much everything. Do you even know what Android 4.0 is and can do...or will you continue to get spoon fed by the Apple hype achine and the army of journalists who support and enable it...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNathan Dube LOLOLOL.... So it's ll about SPECS hu? Yeah you keep thinking that!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@Nathan Dube So if it's all about specs then why even mention Android (an OS) over just a specific smartphone with better specs?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNathan Dube Like I said in the post "While other smartphones might have better cameras, higher megapixels, and better lenses, for some reason, the innovation surrounding these products does not compare to the iPhone." - It's not just about hardware. It's about the community, the apps and the add-ons. I never said it was about specs. (And sorry to disappoint but I actually own a Google Nexus S.)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeget more tech updates from http://www.onlytrrick.com
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDid cell-phone texting redefine literature?
The iPhone camera is mediocre and extremely expensive -- $3,000 to $10,000 and up, easily, once you factor in the years-long voice and data plans. (see http://www.wealthinformatics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/cartoon-iphone.jpg )
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likecapathenextweb or, looked at the other way, since you already need a phone and voice/data plan, the iPhone's camera is free!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThnx This is realy infrmative :) check out my blog and support us :
Netfrootz.blogspot.com
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@TheNextWeb My take is that Nikon/Canon should loose the engineering view on photography for certain camera segments, quickly buy Hipstamatic et al, and launch app-powered camera models with superior optics/speed etc. They urgently need to create their own ecosystem around their gear, or be prepared to loose significant portions of their consumer customers.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHave a look here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HSMo5jb6mQ by http://www.guidaiphone.com
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is interesting...I am a resounding champion of the iPhone as a tool for creating photographic art. It hasn't revolutionised photography though I don't think It may have democratised the photogrpahic art process.
It has revolutionised camera's. The consumer electronics industry is looking at iPhones rush to dominance and is wondering what they did wrong (or rather what they didn't do). I did a presentation about my iphoneography to a local photographic society a few days ago and as part of that I did a demo of how the phone works as a camera. There were audible gasps when the audience saw that I could choose focus and exposure points just by touching the screen on my phone. It wont be long before we see that sort of stuff appearing in other non phone camera's.
One last thing. I now need to go get Steve Jobs biography...did he really say he wanted to revolutionise photography? That sounds pretty much like he was making it up after the event. I think Apple probably had no concept of what was going to happen to the iPhone as a camera when they launched that product. It was several years behind the competition technically. I would be amazed if they knew that the apps that would come out for it would make it so successful in that regard. Interesting article though! Thanks
Gordon
www.inologist.com
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likethat should say I DO think it has democratised the photographic art process!!! sorry for typo's
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like<a href="http://mymysticalphotography.blogspot.com/">My Mystical Photography</a> The word photography comes from two ancient Greek words: photo, for "light," and graph, for "drawing." "Drawing with light" is a way of describing photography. When a photograph is made, light or some other form of radiant energy, such as X rays, is used to record a picture of an object or scene on a light-sensitive surface.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI agree with this article 100%. I own three devices that take photo's: a Nikon D70, an iPhone 4, and a Nintendo 3DS. Despite it having great lenses and taking great pictures, I can't think of the last time I used the D70, because I have to carry a camera bag full of lenses, CF cards, etc. I take most photo's with the iPhone 4, as it's good enough (particularly HDR), always with me, and easy to share from. The 3DS is fun for occasional 3D photos - the quality isn't great, but the 3D is fun.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Twitter
BHPhotoVideo thenextweb Yep. I purchased the iPhone 4s strictly for the camera!
johnbuckingham http:\/\/t.co\/5Jj0LFtY
BHPhotoVideo thenextweb ABSOLUTELY!
barijoe no
rajasa :))
KatrinEismann No, as a good photo follows all the goals we work to meet in all photographs. The iPhone made something new in showing them.
Conversation from Facebook
No, no and no. I've read this article three times now and it just gets worse with each reading. All I'm saying is: Nokia.
Android phones may have better cameras on paper but still haven't seen any that would produce better quality pictures than iPhone. IPhone did revolutionise the point and shoot field of photography but nothing else.
The phone finally has an Android quality camera after 2 years.....not exactly revolutionary.....lol.
Camera+ and Lisa Bettany did it for me.
Yup !
I wouldnt know because i will never buy an iphone.
Well yes , with Instagram :)