UK weighs forcing social media platforms to surface trusted news


UK weighs forcing social media platforms to surface trusted news

Ministers are considering rules that would make BBC, ITV, and Channel 4 content easier to find on Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok, as more Britons get their news from feeds.


Britain’s culture department said on Monday that it is considering requiring social media platforms to make content from public service media and other trusted news providers easier to find in feeds and searches.

The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) named Meta’s Facebook, Alphabet-owned YouTube, and TikTok as the kind of platforms that could fall under such rules, which would push outlets including the BBC, ITV, and Channel 4 higher up the places where people now look for news.

The reasoning rests on data from the media regulator, Ofcom. Social media is now a main news source for a majority of UK adults, and for around three-quarters of those aged 16 to 24, the department said.

The implication is that the gatekeeping once done by broadcasters and front pages has migrated to recommendation algorithms, and that the public service outlets the country funds and regulates are competing for attention against everything else in the feed.

The 💜 of EU tech

The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol' founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It's free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!

Sitting behind the proposal is a concern about what fills the gap when trusted news is hard to find. Separate Ofcom research from 2024 found that four in 10 UK adults had encountered misinformation in a single month, most of it online.

Ministers are presenting the prominence rules as one answer to that, on the logic that surfacing established newsrooms is easier than policing the false material around them.

The prominence idea is the headline measure, but it arrives as part of a wider rethink of how public service broadcasting works in an age of streaming.

DCMS said it is also considering widening public service media status so that it could include online-only providers, a category that did not exist when the current framework was written.

That would potentially extend the privileges, and obligations, of the designation beyond the traditional broadcasters.

Two further measures are on the table. The department is weighing whether to extend the free-to-air protections that currently cover major sporting events, the so-called listed events regime, to on-demand viewing, so that highlights and replays remain freely available rather than disappearing behind paywalls.

And it is preparing to consult on a longer-term shift to internet-based television, with a switchover from traditional broadcast signals pencilled in for somewhere between 2034 and 2044.

The platforms are likely to push back. Companies in their position have argued before that prominence rules override user choice, substituting a regulator’s judgement about what people should see for the preferences expressed through their own behaviour.

They have also warned that promoting a designated set of news providers disadvantages other creators, who would find themselves ranked below outlets chosen by the state.

The friction over YouTube’s policies on creators has shown how quickly questions of who gets surfaced, and who gets buried, turn contentious.

The move also fits a broader European appetite for asserting control over the digital infrastructure that shapes public life, a theme visible in everything from content rules to questions of tech sovereignty across the continent.

Britain, outside the European Union but still wrestling with the same platforms, is testing how far a national regulator can reach into the ranking systems those platforms run.

For now, nothing is settled. The measures are described as under consideration, and the consultations and any legislation that follow will take months at least.

The platforms named have not yet set out a formal response, and the detail of how prominence would actually be measured and enforced remains to be worked out.

What the department has done is signal the direction, putting the major social networks on notice that the question of whose news rises to the top is no longer entirely theirs to decide.

Get the TNW newsletter

Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.