Join us at TNW Conference 2021 for insights into the future of tech →

The heart of tech

This article was published on July 12, 2011


    National Sheriff’s Association throws its weight behind data retention laws

    National Sheriff’s Association throws its weight behind data retention laws
    Joel Falconer
    Story by

    Joel Falconer

    Joel Falconer is the Features Editor at TNW. He lives on the Gold Coast, Australia with his wife and three kids and can sometimes be found g Joel Falconer is the Features Editor at TNW. He lives on the Gold Coast, Australia with his wife and three kids and can sometimes be found gaming or consulting. Follow Joel on Twitter.

    The National Sheriff’s Association says it will strongly support mandatory data retention by ISPs in a House of Representatives hearing tomorrow, CNET reports.

    The association believes that ISPs don’t store information on their customer’s Internet usage for long enough, says board member Michael Brown.

    Data retention schemes widely and rightfully evoke strong emotions from citizens in Western countries where the topic has been raised before. When the Attorney-General’s department proposed mandatory retention schemes in Australia last year, the public and press response was not particularly warm.

    With laws like these floating around, forget about forgetting about that one time you accidentally clicked on some tranny porn. It’ll be the main topic of discussion at your next parking violation hearing.

    The National Sheriff’s Association hinges their argument on the importance of data retention in subduing those involved in viewing and distributing child pornography. As a father of three, I’d like nothing more than to see an end to child pornography, and a start to particularly cruel and unusual executions for those involved in any way with it.

    That said, giving any government more of our personal Internet activity and even email correspondence to snoop around in doesn’t sit well with me. Given the US government’s taste for snooping illegally, it’s pretty much a guarantee that the search for child predators won’t be the primary use for all that data to be retained should legislation be drafted and approved.