Trump’s AI advisor says Kimi K3 shows “how you lose the AI race.” Khosla blames immigration. Marcus wants a congressional investigation.

Moonshot's open model topped coding leaderboards within 24 hours. Wall Street called it an "inflection point" that is bad for OpenAI and Anthropic but good for everyone else.


Trump’s AI advisor says Kimi K3 shows “how you lose the AI race.” Khosla blames immigration. Marcus wants a congressional investigation. Image by: Kimi

TL;DR

Kimi K3 topped Arena’s coding leaderboard in 24 hours. Trump advisor Sacks warned the US is losing. Khosla blamed immigration. A Wall Street CIO called it bad news for closed AI labs.

Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 topped Arena’s frontend coding leaderboard within 24 hours of launch, ahead of Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.6 Sol. It placed third on Artificial Analysis’s Intelligence Index. The reaction from Washington, Wall Street, and academia was swift and pointed. TNW covered the model’s capabilities at launch, but the political and economic fallout is a story of its own.

David Sacks, Trump’s former AI czar and current cochair of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, called the release “concerning” and said it was the first time a Chinese model had taken the top coding spot. He blamed US regulatory self-harm: blocking data centres, layering on state regulations, and pushing for federal pre-approval of frontier models. “This is how you lose the AI race,” Sacks wrote. “Permissionless innovation is how America won the internet.” Vinod Khosla agreed and added that US immigration policy is “scaring away brilliant talent.

Gary Marcus, the longtime AI industry critic, took a different view. “Congress should investigate. Seriously,” he wrote, pointing to a Goldman Sachs chart showing US cloud capex reaching roughly $1 trillion in 2027, about eight times China’s projected spending. The implication: if Chinese labs can match or approach US performance at a fraction of the cost, the trillion-dollar buildout may be harder to justify.

Gavin Baker, CIO at Atreides Management, called K3 an “inflection point” and said it is bad news for closed AI startups like OpenAI and Anthropic but a net positive for everyone else. “Anything that lowers margins and increases competition at the model layer is good for every other AI layer: power, semiconductors, hyperscalers, neoclouds and yes even software,” Baker wrote. DeepSeek already made its 75% price cut permanent, and K3’s open-weight release at frontier-level coding performance accelerates the same dynamic: the model layer commoditises while the infrastructure and application layers capture the value.

Get the TNW newsletter

Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.