A top UK judge is to make it easier for journalists to use Twitter in courts in England and Wales, with the press no longer required to seek permission to live-tweet during court cases.
In new practice guidance notes released today, the Lord Chief Justice clarified the “use of live text-based forms of communication (including Twitter) from court, for the purposes of fair and accurate reporting”, which will only apply to reporters. Members of the public will still be required to have specific permission to use live text-based communications platforms in court, because it’s felt this would have an impact on witnesses and jurors involved in court cases.
Though this won’t mean that journalists will be able to illustrate their tweets with images and soundbites though – it will still be illegal to take photographs, videos and audio recordings in court. But with this relaxation of the laws, we’ll likely start seeing many more mammoth Tweetathons emanating from courts in England and Wales. Thus far, journalists have had to request permission to use Twitter and similar platforms on a case-by-case basis, and there has been a number of high-profile cases covered by Twitter in recent months, such as the Stephen Lawrence and Jo Yeates murder trials.
Lord Judge first gave the go-ahead for Twitter to be used in courts in England and Wales almost exactly a year ago, following reporters’ requests to live-tweet the extradition proceedings around Wikileaks founder Julian Assange.
You can read the new guidance notes in full here:


















I had no diea teweet could be so cool liek that.
www.WebPrivacy.tk
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikePaul: The story incorrectly mentions the UK. The advice applies only to England and Wales.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGraeme West Yup, fair point Graeme. Have clarified that within the piece. Thanks for pointing out.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikePaul SawersGraeme West
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Twitter
postoditacco paese che vai democrazia che trovi
joseo chi va avanti e chi indietro #diversamentedemocratici
glynmoody fyi if missed.. V interesting RT Glinner Wow. Louis CK's cool move made him $500k http:\/\/t.co\/HhwY6RIg
4b5 thanks, yes, was covered well on techdirt
glynmoody oops ofcourse...Oz time zone strikes again..)..cheers
e_kaspersky_ru Английские суды это классика))
Евгений привет! Это Слава. 2008 НГ в Финляндии :) Авторизуй, а то в личку не написать :(
glynmoody Sorry, I realise you've already been corrected through the TNW tweet replies.
BigRedBall not actually - see previous tweet
glynmoody I think you mean "England & Wales", not "UK". Scotland has a separate legal system. Allowed it 4 Sheridan trial but not much else
BigRedBall well, since I didn't write the story, I don't mean anything...
glynmoody Here is the info you need to correct your story:
http:\/\/t.co\/4Bsih1jL
TheFirmOnline try this: tgw_paul, or email him at paul(at)http:\/\/t.co\/xdR7P58J.
glynmoody "UK courts" is repeated twice in your story, and no mention made of the Lord President's announcement either.
TheFirmOnline er, not my story: belongs to a certain Paul Sawyer - you might try contacting him...
glynmoody Not true Glyn. England\/Wales only. Scotland considering the position.
TheFirmOnline thanks for the clarification of the headline (not my words...)
glynmoody clearly one of the requirements is to be able to phone-hack celebrities, or is that just Murdoch publications?
LapTop006 I can't help feeling that phone-hack journos don't really use twitter...