Digg has suffered an alarming 50 percent drop in US traffic over the last six months according to information from Quantcast.
Updated below with statistics from Digg.
The data, which is based on estimates and not direct measurements, suggests that the once mighty bookmarking and social sharing service has seen monthly visits in the US drop from 9.4 million in May to 4.6 million in October.
Times have tougher for Digg since its founder Kevin Rose stepped down from his position as CEO in June 2010 after growing frustrating by the lack of production innovation and the stress of “keeping 90 people on the same page as to what’s going on in the company”.
While Rose moved on to focus on a number of startups he is involved — including newly launched Oink – the company he founded has struggled despite unveiling number of designs and content shifts with little sign of recreating its early success.
Digg, which was forced to lay-off off more than a third of its staff last October 2010, is placed considerable emphasis on covering breaking news with its most recent feature, Newsroom, designed to “separate the news from the noise”.
In contrast to Digg, rival Reddit is going from strength to strength having served 1.8 billion page views to 28 million unique visitors during October, although these stats cover worldwide users and not the US.
Quantcast’s estimate for Reddit shows varying levels of traffic in the last six month with a peak of 15 million US visitors registered during June. The most recent measurement estimates that the site saw 13.7 million US visitors during October — that’s almost three times more than Digg — which puts US visits at around half of its total traffic.
With a range of new features for Google+ making it all the more competitive, and importantly closer aligned with Google products, competition with Facebook, Twitter and other social media has never been fiercer for social sharing services like Digg and Reddit.
Update: the Quantcast chart is “wrong” according to Digg which has published a blog post with the actual traffic figures from the site. The conclusion is “pretty different if you’re looking at the actual data” rather than estimates, according to Digg’s Ben Folk-Williams.
The chart below shows a steady line of worldwide traffic, with visits from US consistently reported to account for half of the total.
Digg has also provided additional statistics too:
- Digg Newsrooms have been in beta for a month and we are seeing great response – In particular page views per visit are up 3x versus classic Digg.
- We’re seeing dramatically higher engagement from our Facebook fans, with users coming from Facebook spending an average of 15 minutes on site as compared to 10 minutes for other logged in users.
- On mobile, we’ve seen a 23% increase in daily users since the launch of our revised iOS app with Newsroom integration.
- 51% of our traffic is direct. That metric can be a tricky one to measure correctly if you aren’t careful – we are. That means 13 million times every month someone types Digg.com into a browser.



![digg us traffic 520x373 photo digg us traffic 520x373 US Traffic to Digg Reportedly Down 50% Over Last 6 Months [Updated: Not True Says Digg]](http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/11/digg-us-traffic-520x373.png)
![reddit us traffic 520x370 photo reddit us traffic 520x370 US Traffic to Digg Reportedly Down 50% Over Last 6 Months [Updated: Not True Says Digg]](http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/11/reddit-us-traffic-520x370.png)
![diggtraffic 520x134 photo diggtraffic 520x134 US Traffic to Digg Reportedly Down 50% Over Last 6 Months [Updated: Not True Says Digg]](http://cdn.thenextweb.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2011/11/diggtraffic-520x134.png)















The end of Diggnation in December isn't going to help either.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDigg will be back stronger in due time.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI think digg will rebound as soon as folks start realizing how much fun the Newsrooms are, but I admit they didn't make as much of an initial splash as I thought they would in the social media world. Digg is far from a graveyard though. Things have fallen for a couple years now, and the complexion of Digg has changed. It is the 19th top website in Pakistan now, and all across South Asia it is rising. If you want to see more traffic stats, you can go to either of these and type in Reddit.com to compare and contrast the traffic stats: http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/digg.com http://www.quantcast.com/digg.com
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likenovenator I agree Nov
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe biggest reason the traffic dropped was that there was a huge riot on Digg against the new design. Users made it clear that they did not like the new Digg and wanted them to revert back to the old version. Digg couldn't admit their mistake and tried pushing users to adapt to the new Digg.
If you look at the stats, it shows that Diggs traffic dropped after users realize that there was no chance of going back to the old version. Kevin Rose left after being embarrassing by the same people who once idolized him.
Note that Digg had a huge spam problem lasting almost as long as their website. They were hugely controlled by many power users who were paid to promote specific websites. Digg was always slow to react. They tried doing a mass-ban but those people just created new accounts and continued using bots to gain higher ranks on Digg.
Digg is a ghost city
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is a wild guess, but maybe those type of sites are much more connected with the persona behind them. In this case Kevin Rose. There have been other cases where the person behind a site dragged away a lot of visitors when they left, sometimes to a new project. Like Techcrunch -> Uncrunch or Engadget -> The Verve.
But also the quality of Digg.com has constantly gone downhill even when Rose was still involved.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNews on estimates?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMatt Jurek
Estimates are okay if you compare them over time. If Quantcast shows 50% traffic loss over a period, the reality will be similar. They use a constant base for their calculations.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like