TNW Social Media. Part of The Next Web Network.

WTF is Kevin Rose Thinking? [Updated!]

Picture 59Update: We’ve been notified via this tweet that the issue addressed below is now resolved. Your Twitter profile URL does not change by default, it is now an opt in feature.

This, from a new startup or young entrepreneur, I’d let slide, but from a veteran of the start-up/tech/social media scene, it needs addressing.

Digital Inspiration noticed a setting on Kevin Rose’s ’side project’  We Follow, a Twitter user directory. The setting by default replaces your Twitter profile URL with your WeFollow.com URL the moment you join the directory.

See, to add yourself to the directory, you’re taken to a page where you’re made to compile a tweet to send to your followers.

Picture 56

The tweet is similar to the image posted above, includes a link to wefollow and the tags you’d like to be categorised under. A rather clever way to get the word out and give your followers some indication as to what you’re about – win win. Once the tweet is sent, you’re added to the directory and you get on with your day.

Picture 58What you probably wouldn’t have noticed however are two settings discreetly placed above the ’send tweet and sign up’ button. One of the settings is relatively harmless (“follow ‘wefollow’ on Twitter”), the other is “Update my twitter url to be my WeFollow profile”.

Yes, some more alert users will notice the settings, but most, similar to skipping past terms & conditions, are unlikely to have read any of it. It’s a slimy tactic and (generally) far removed from the generally smart moves of Rose, a respected Silicon Valley entrepreneur and founder of Digg.

For many then, until they visit their own Twitter Profile (when was the last time you did that?), they’re left with their original profile URL (usually to their blog or own website) replaced with a link to their WeFollow profile which incidentally shows almost identical pieces of information as a standard Twitter Profile – albeit presented prettier.

A little comparison:

We at The Next Web run a startup incubator and one of the companies we’re proud to call our own is Twitter Counter, a top 5 Twitter app. Upon sign up, you’re presented with a selection of settings, one of which is to immediately follow any ‘featured users’ listed on Twitter Counter. Featured Twitter Counter users pay for the privilege and their goal is clearly to gain more followers. The more people who sign up for Twitter Counter and have that setting enabled, the more followers a featured user is likely to receive, and therefore, more return customers for Twitter Counter and in the longer term, more revenue too.

The point here is that the Twitter Counter setting is disabled by default and it is only users who visit their settings page and manually decide to enable the option who bring us any monetary profit – that’s only approximately 30% of the user base. That said, had we enabled the setting by default and unbeknownst to them, they begin noticing new people joining their twitter stream, can you picture the reaction once they discovered it was an opt-out feature enabled when they signed up to Twitter Counter? Furious.

Mr. Rose, come to your senses and get rid of the setting now…or at the very least, make it an opt-in option. This goes for other Twitter app developers too, creating features that are naturally viral is one thing but imposing yourself on a user will ultimately get you nowhere.

Zee Editor In Chief, The Next Web Network
Based in London, Zee is Editor in Chief of The Next Web.Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.

  • bored@stumbleupon
    Are you people that blind that you can't read that? It is even indented and centered to draw your attention over a normal checkbox. If you try to make your design idiot proof, they only come up with a better idiot.
  • Sebastiaan
    Users can't think for themselves? If everyone would be so infuriated about it, WeFollow probably wouldn't have any users left, so I guess it's not that bad. Just uncheck it if you don't like it.

    It's not even close to unethical guys, it's just what people call savvy marketing nowadays.
  • It may be "savvy marketing" but it's really bordering unethical behavior to steer people forcibly away from their status quo.

    Think back a few years ago when Comcast started hijacking people away from Google and MSN to their search engine (or when companies install scripts to use custom 404 messages that show ads).

    Nobody liked it then - why should it be tolerated now?
  • and there are no laws or guidelines on Twitter when one accepts the options, because it seems totally inappropriate to allow this to happen, even if for veneficio of them, I think that has to respect users more than anything.
  • More proof that Kevin Rose is a Douchelord
  • Great points and you're right -- K. Rose knows better!
  • As stated, most people don't notice it just like the Terms and Conditions on most sites. I blame those of you who use a service like this, not uncheck the checked boxes (something that comes naturally to me now because of all the spam I've been getting in the past).

    I think wefollow are smart in doing something like this, because it's the fault of the users and not the website.
  • Wefollow is now owed by Digg. So you can blame Digg for all this. Before when Kevin owned the site this feature wasnt added.
  • Doesn't surprise me either. That's like thinking the season premier of Lost was going to actually be good.
  • hate scammy people
    He's been hanging around Jason Calcanis too much. That is ridiculous.
  • Real question should probly be "wtf was dave naylor thinking?"
  • Epic Fail
    Lame. Epic Fail.
  • Considering the iFrame/Digg bar thing, not that surprising.
blog comments powered by Disqus