In the list of stuff that corporations do not like, muddying their registered trademarks is among the most heinous of crimes. It’s no surprise, therefore, that Apple regularly goes after companies that repurpose its trademarks for their own uses, and Google does not like its name being synonymous with search. No sir, not one bit!
In fact, Google hates it so much that when the Oxford English Dictionary and Merriam-Webster officially classified it as a verb way back in 2006, the company put up a serious—but good-humoured—blog post reminding us all that it was not particularly thrilled about having received the honour. Here’s one of the examples it gave:
Usage: ‘Google’ as verb referring to searching for information via any conduit other than Google.
Example: “I googled him on Yahoo and he seems pretty interesting.”
Our lawyers say: Bad. Very, very bad. You can only “Google” on the Google search engine. If you absolutely must use one of our competitors, please feel free to “search” on Yahoo or any other search engine.
Guess what? Google is not the only company that has a problem with its name being turned into just another ordinary verb.
Why, Adobe would like you to know that it is poor form to say that “I photoshopped that image into perfection” or “that photoshop of Megan Fox was comically bad” (even more so when you find out that that is what she actually looks like now).
Behold, Adobe’s primer on the “proper use of the Photoshop trademark”:
Always capitalize and use trademarks in their correct form.
Correct: The image was enhanced with Adobe® Photoshop® Elements software.
Incorrect: The image was photoshopped.
Incorrect: The image was Photoshopped.
Incorrect: The image was Adobe® Photoshopped.
See what we mean?
While we are all for companies protecting their copyrights and trademarks—and care enough about them ourselves to write a whole guide about writing “Google+” properly—you have to excuse us for chuckling quietly to ourselves when they expect us to turn every mention of their name into something that was written by an attorney!


















This comment was enhanced with Adobe® Photoshop® Elements software.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis page has been there for quite some time hasn't it?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI think Adobe® needs to lighten up about the use of the Photoshop® name.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOne can understand Adobe's concern, 'verbing' the company name was an absolute tragedy for Hoover.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSo basically these companies are telling us how to use our own language? Well, actually no, they're not. They're trying to control how other corporations, like themselves, refer to their stuff. Not a huge crime.
Except Google of course - they apparently <em>are</em> trying to control how ordinary people speak by raising an objection to a dictionary. They need to grow up.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeScrew that. I will now say "image was altered," or "I did stuff to it on a computer," or "I, alone, myself, made it better."
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAs long as there have been trademarked products this has been an issue. Do you ask for a facial tissue, or a Kleenex?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeToo late, too bad: it is imprinted on many people's minds that something is 'photoshopped'. Just like having tweeted something, or to google something...Heck there's a complete website dedicated to bad photoshops - http://www.psdisasters.com in this case.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThere are very real reasons why they desperately try to avoid their trademark becoming generic... This is a good Wiki article explaining why: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genericized_trademarkThe chuckleworthy announcements and encouragements from these companies are what help them preserve their trademarks (distrinct from copyright btw).
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHamid Sirhan I agree that it can be dangerous for a brand to be genericized, but announcements like this are nmot what preserves this. I never saw someone use Adobe's preferred way of using the term (out of humorous context).
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Twitter
benjaminferran ton avatar tweeter n'a pas été retouché par Adobe Photoshop mais développée par Adobe Photoshop
alemremi Je suis ta création. :)
TipSquirrel Jeez these companies so need to get a life! don't you think?
ShotbyRobins that's stupid, thought they would be stoked that their product name is apart of everyday language :\
JadedSphnix yeah you'd think so
muskrat_john wayword Photoshop can already forget its trademark and all that. That other crap would hog up your whole tweet.
muskrat_john wayword I'll jot that down on to a post-it note & scotch tape it to the wall by my desk. But let me finish my coke first.
muskrat_john worst. NPR. Show. EVAR! #evenworsethanprairiehomecompanion
muskrat_john Ah, trademark lawyers' fear of genericness.
wayword So. what I'm hearing is, they didn't copyright the verb...in which case, it would be ok. #buzzkill #brandequity #commonusage
RockTique pffft... please.... "googling" and "photoshopping" are 2 of my favorite hobbies! :D
AintItBeautiful Ha! I second that!
TheLilyfish jonrussell Given the linux equivalent of Photoshop is GIMP, I prefer to say a photo has been gimped :)
lrs lol
gillyberlin "The image was dishanced using Adobe® Photoshop® software"
benjaminferran ça me rappel une AE ou les gens de chez Adobe gonflaient tout le monde sur la prononciation de adobe
Conversation from Facebook
Adobe sucks. They have become like every other mega-corp, and I have been using their products for decades. Use GIMP instead.
Too bad it sounds un-PC to say you GIMPed it.
It is not always an "enhancement"
Too bad it's the only way Adobe can protect their trademark. Otherwise, Microsoft would advertise that you can Photoshop with MS Paint :/
That is just ridiculous. Isn't that word in the dictionaries already?
Do what we say or you will be "LawyerSued"
Meh, looks like the attorneys photoshopped that one.
Yeah, too much.
Flash in the pan...