For Christmas this year, I was finally able to shed the cash to pick up an Xbox 360 along with a Kinect. While I do enjoy playing the games, what I’m most enthralled by is using the Kinect when watching TV. People keep talking about a forthcoming Apple TV, and I welcome it with open arms, but right now Microsoft has the right tool to shake up the market.
This year at CES was all about disappointing “Smart TVs” and overblown 3D, with some truly beautiful Super OLED displays thrown in for good measure. TNW’s Martin Bryant says that he’s already sick of the Smart TV idea because the offerings are lackluster at best. While I completely agree with his sentiment, I think that Microsoft could make a major move into the space and knock down all of the competition in its wake.
Why? Because Microsoft is already doing it right:
The Kinect
It does precisely what I want it to do in making it even easier to watch TV. That’s something that my now-dust-gathering $99 Apple TV box failed to accomplish. As I said before, anything that makes it more difficult to just enjoy a moving picture on a screen is ultimately headed in the wrong direction.
With the Kinect, I can sit down and talk to my TV. The on-screen commands are intuitive and natural and they work better than any voice recognition system I’ve ever used, Siri included. I thought it would be awkward to use voice to navigate through menus but it just isn’t. Microsoft has nailed this perfectly.
The Metro UI
There’s simply no denying that Microsoft’s execution of the Metro UI is great. What’s most impressive about the interface to me is that it really does translate equally as well on a handheld Nokia phone as it does on my 42-inch Philips. No matter how much I love OS X and my MacBook Pro, the rest of the consumer market is dominated by Windows. Giving users an already-familiar interface with which to work should add to the chances for Microsoft-driven Smart TV success.
Existing Partnerships
We already have Verizon’s white-hot FIOS system integrated with Kinect. But really, you can consider this to be proof of concept of how well it can work. Microsoft can use this to approach makers like Samsung and LG, showing them the potential of including Kinect hardware inside the bezels of their devices.
If I were the person making the decisions, I’d take the rumored internal-processor of the forthcoming second version of the Kinect and enable it to be its own platform. There would be no need for an Xbox because the TV’s OS would be centered around a modified version of Windows Phone, with Kinect being the interface device. When you look at how well Kinect already works, this is an easy sell to any manufacturer that is trying to get a leg up in the crowded TV market.
The Rest of the Players
Google tried, and failed, to do TV right. It was a valiant effort but might as well be hung out to dry. Boxee’s Box is great, but it still feels way too much like operating a computer and that’s going to turn people away who want simplicity. Ubuntu’s offering is strong, but it takes people to an unfamiliar place and consumers don’t want that.
The market is ready for something more than just a screen, but it has to be easy, it has to be familiar and it has to work. So far Microsoft has been the only company that’s made something which truly does all of these things, and yet it was an afterthought to a gaming product. It’s time for Redmond to get serious about TV and Kinect is the key to making it happen.


















We get it, you LOVE your apple products, but it was really necessary to state that so often?
Apple TV is a beta project and a poor device when compared with others TV enchancers. Why use it for comparison?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likekorg250 So often? I mentioned it once. And as for the Apple TV in its current form, I'm pretty sure Apple NEVER said it was a beta product, only that it wasn't a focus for the company.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeBrad McCarty My mistake, not a beta project, but a hobby : http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/24/apple-says-apple-tv-is-still-a-hobby-tim-cook-cant-live-with/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeBrad McCarty I mean, why make a comparison with Apple TV and not Roku?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likekorg250Brad McCarty korg:, Apple sold 1.4 million Apple TVs in 4th quarter 2011 how many did Roku sell? I'm going to assume a lot less.Beta denotes unfinished. Apple TV is a finished and refined. It works and will only get better. Especially once they unleash apps for it.I'm not sure what Apple TV product you're using but I can stream movies and music to all my TVs from my Macs, iPhones and iPads. Hardly a "poor" device. I get Netflix on it which i have to say looks incredible. You sound like one of those guys that would say "why are you comparing Windows 7 to OS X. What about Ubuntu??"
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likekorg250Brad McCarty and apparently you can't do paragraphs with this commenting system... wonderful. Well imagine there should have been 3 paragraphs in my last comment.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJeff SchaderBrad McCarty I wrote him about the link, then I remembered to make another remark a few minutes later. You are really presumptuous to assume you are smarter than everybody else.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJeff SchaderBrad McCarty I do not know how many they sold the last quarter, but Roku has best seller devices as 2nd, 3rd, 6st, 11st and 16st position at amazon: http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/electronics/13447451/ref=pd_zg_hrsr_e_1_4_last
Based on the number of comments Roku is more popular than Apple TV, and offers, in my opinion, a better approach to digital media content.
I believe I can assume you have never tried Roku, and think everything should be compared with any apple product - because you life revolves around the glowing apple.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeyou act as though you are the first person to suggest this when in fact, MORe people think Microsoft will do it than think Apple will. (Though, neither will be doing it any time soon, nor will Google, because people simply aren't looking for it in the first place.)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likelakawak I want your tech circle then. Because everything I'm seeing is all eyes on Apple. Your circle is more likely to be right.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYour article is wrong in many ways.
http://robjones.us/2011/12/06/microsoft-and-its-abuse-of-the-xbox-360-user/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeRob Jones Correction: Your opinion is that my article is wrong in many ways.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeBrad McCartyRob Jones
Correction, his opinion is that your opinion is wrong.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeRob Jones
http://seblc.me/2012/01/20/metroui/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeRob Jones
Rob, Your article is so poorly written in so many ways.... .
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeRob Jones How does your crappy, inaccurate blog make this article wrong? Your childish whining about the interface doesn't mean anything to anyone but yourself (That is why you don't make any money on your crappy blog.)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeoh dear... Clearly easy to impress.... I wonder if you will stand by all this time in a few months time?... Lest all watch this space shall we?....
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeItchen College Photo Show me something better, on the market today. It doesn't exist. People need to stop hating on the idea that Microsoft can make a good product and accept that they have.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMicrosoft nailed it with Metro and I thing it does scale beautifully. SebLC wrote an interesting post about the importance of Metro at Microsoft. Check it otu: http://seblc.me/2012/01/20/metroui/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likehahahahahaha... I just had to laugh at this. too funny!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like