Microsoft founder and former CEO Bill Gates has become well-known for his efforts in raising money and awarenessfor charities via the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. According to the below infographic, he has given $28 Billion to charity since 2007, which is 48% of his net-worth.
The Gates Foundation has focused on eradicating Malaria, helping third-world countries grow rice, and a crusade to end Polio.
Gates is carving out his legacy with his post-Microsoft efforts, which are both admirable and impressive.
Source: frugaldad.com



















Let’s thoroughly arm more and more through the revolutionary ideas of the Great Bill Gates!
위대한 수령 빌 게이츠동지의 혁명사상으로 더욱 철저히 무장하자!
http://bit.ly/wtTc3K
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe "which is 48% of his net-worth" is a bit misleading.The foundation is a company. Although Billy G has put a lot of his money into the foundation, the foundation raises and makes money by investing in other companies (which has made headlines due to the type of companies that it invests in).With that said, I wouldn't consider him a "Batman", more of a "Robinhood". Take from the rich (or well off), and give to the poor.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJason LeBel It's a foundation, as legally defined by the US laws (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%26_Melinda_Gates_Foundation). Pretty much all foundations would invest their money instead of letting tit rot in banks, that doesn't make it a company.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAlthough I have to ask, who is actually getting the money? I imagine if most of it's going towards vaccines then it must be large pharmaceutical companies that are getting all these billions of dollars.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLuke Jon Gibson You can find this information pretty easily. The large pharma companies aren't pocketing big checks from Bill Gates whatsoever. This isn't some phony "money transfer" scam or something else sinister like you're implying. Much of the money goes directly to the projects and people that have a high likelihood of success, and where existing "free market" solutions (such as pharma companies waiting around for big checks) have failed. Google "gates foundation" and read a bit more yourself. Or, even better, get involved. :-)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLuke Jon Gibson Just as in the comment below, the pharmaceutical companies aren't the ones making money. They were more than happy to be part of this philanthropic cause led by Bill Gates. As is mentioned in the article, he persuaded the companies to bring back the Polio vaccine. Now he as been encouraging them to come up with Malaria vaccine. The companies know that they cannot make a lot of money from people who will be the main users of these vaccines, but one thing is sure they will be improving their brand value. This might generate them money in the future, but they aren't actually making money at the moment. And this deed of them should be applauded.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLamichhane AayamLuke Jon Gibson no deed done by those with vast resources at their fingertips need applauded. i applaud the poor and middle-class people that donate even when they don't have enough to put food on their table. I am not inspired, nor impressed, by those who clearly should be giving back significantly, without being prodded or looking for the bigger sale through "good samaritan PR." A bit pessimistic, yes, but I don't relate to pharma companies or philanthropists. Off of whose backs did these people become richer?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAnd this is why Windows is better than Mac! :D
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAnd they Say that Steve Jobs is the Hero
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGrant Miller Steve Jobs was never a hero. He actually STOPPED ALL philanthropic donations when he was reinstated as Apple's CEO.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGrace Yu-An ChangGrant Miller Bill Gates didn't do much philanthropy when he was Microsoft's CEO either -- he was too busy. I have no doubt Steve Jobs would have done the same if he lived long enough.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likesffun Gates actually asked Jobs about becoming part of the giving pledge, to which Jobs told him not a chance. Jobs did wonderful things for technology, but as far as being a philanthropist... not so much
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikesffunGrace Yu-An ChangGrant Miller
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikesffunGrace Yu-An ChangGrant Miller I am sure you know this because you have actually researched into it?
Actually while he was still CEO of MicroSoft (and imagine how busy would it be to run a billion-dollar company), his father would drop a box of charity applicants that request more than $ 1M funding on his door almost everyday, and Bill would go over each and every one of them, leaving comments and/or approvals on the proposals for his father to pick up in the morning.
You don't do that to evade taxes, and you don't do that to make yourselves look good. He clearly believes in this and guess what? If you *really* want to do something, there's no such a thing as "too busy".
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGrace Yu-An Chang yeah , i was being sarcastic beacause everyone called him a hero and a great man in history when he died
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhile Bill Gates is awesome and a real live-hero, Batman has saved the WHOLE world... multiple times... so, your move Gates!
BTW, nothing but respect for Gates - the above comment was meant to be satirical.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like