There has been scuttlebutt about Microsoft potentially overtaking Nokia even since before the companies reached a landmark Windows Phone agreement with regards to the flailing Finnish giant’s smartphone business last year.
But as logical as such a move might be to some, so far unsubstantiated rumors is all we had, and both Nokia and Microsoft have in the past denied that a merger or purchase of Nokia’s smartphone division was on the table.
But well-placed sources tell us that Microsoft was given access to Nokia’s books late last year in an attempt to evaluate which parts, if any, were worth acquiring. Not many people know this. The story is that having had a gander, Microsoft walked away.
The only reason Microsoft would have paid a premium for Nokia last year was to keep it out of the hands of a rival. But it’s hard to see which buyer would have valued Nokia as highly as Microsoft does, and would have paid a premium.
Orlowski goes on to say that it makes sense for Microsoft to turn Nokia into a hardware+software division much like it runs Xbox, but that it’d simply be cheaper to wait until Nokia runs out of cash completely. Ouch – but indeed.
I have no doubt in my mind that something is bound to happen with Nokia at some point. I simply don’t see a turn-around happening, and the Finnish company has so many valuable assets (IP, engineering talent, brand, distribution channels, carrier relations and so on) that it can’t imagine it simply fading out completely.
Also read: Screw the naysayers: Why I just bought Nokia