India’s high court has today threatened to block Google, Facebook and other Internet firms unless they put a system in place to prevent offensive content from being published to the Web.
An NDTV report quotes Justice Suresh Kait as warning the firms that “like China, we will block all such websites [containing objectionable material]” unless they agree to introduce new measures.
The comments come after Google and Facebook turned to the country’s high court in response to a private criminal investigation being processed in a Delhi court. This case follows another court order against the duo for allowing users to post images that are alleged to degrade religious symbols in the country.
In response to requests for a real-time filtering system to weed out the offensive content before it is published, which were originally started by comments from acting telecom minister Kapil Sibal, Google India’s legal representative claimed that “no human interference is possible and, moreover, it can’t be feasible to check such incidents”.
Sibal, who is a lawyer by profession, had claimed that a new system is required to handle the issue as India’s legal system is not suitably empowered to do so. Nonetheless a private lawsuit — reportedly submitted by a member of the public — is under way with Facebook and Google both accused of circulating “obscene, lascivious content”under three sections of the Indian penal code.
Previously, Sibal suggested that the Indian government would work with Internet firms directly to solve the issue — after Google and Facebook both claimed that their existing content management system were adequate enough — but it remains how this will develop with both Facebook and Google continually opposing the requests. We’ll soon know more as the next hearing is scheduled for January 16.


















with these requests what these ppl are doing, knowingly or unknowingly, is bringing to the forefront the amount of venom or 'hate' we have within us, over others' way of life, and don't wanted to discuss it publicly or in the open, least we're shown in poor light in front of friends.these, if not address by us, might need to be regulated. else we'll have a massively polarized world, with each taking an even harder stand. and with a developing country like India, having kept its ancient & pluralistic structure intact, for the good or bad, things could easily flare up.we, the educated-middle-class in India live in our own cocoons, seldom do we interact with those under trying circumstances & most of us don't vote. anyways, everything aside, i believe things should be self-regulatory. & lets avoid generalizing things so simplistically for developed and developing-countries - their 'way of life' (at least most of them) are as different as apples and oranges
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI don't know if Google can afford to loose India just like they lost China, they made some investments in India,
maybe it's the end of international free Internet.... China, India, Iran... together with SOPA... every country will have its Internet? Unattractive vision http://baretech.wordpress.com/2011/12/05/2011-the-year-in-which-the-internet-has-started-to-end/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likecheck it out: http://thenewindianrebel.tumblr.com/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGrow up you idiots. Google is more helpful/useful to us than you guys! Leave it be! And how the hell are FB and Google supposed to check what is going on? Tell your kids to stay off FB and also those religious nuts so that they don't see such stuff. I mean, really, so much censorship. Movies on TV have beeped words, cut scenes, just cos children might see them? You even beep a normal word like pee which simply means to urinate. Stop this shit, let me enjoy the movies the way they were made!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likegrow the hell up!!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhat the fck is this... Its not 1960... People should be allowed to post whatever the hell they want. Every community finds one or the other thing offensive, whats ok in one community is blasphemy in another, Does that mean the former do not have rights to voice their opinions because some stuck up moron thinks it offensive...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Facebook
So who is the all high and mighty that gets to choose what content is offensive?