Google’s former CEO Eric Schmidt spoke at the Mobile World Congress today about the future of technology in developing countries and how its services will play a role in ecosystems who rely solely on the Internet for business, information, and communication.
During Schmidt’s keynote, he didn’t speak specifically about Google products and services but during the question and answer portion of his talk, he was asked directly about the future of Google search and advertising. He gladly answered the question and he noted that he had tried to not make his talk a commercial for the search giant.
Schmidt noted that Google search will continue to become more personalized, getting away from the “10 link” approach that we see in search results today. He noted that thousands of Google engineers are currently working on beefing up search with artificial intelligence in hopes to find us the results we want right away.
One important piece of the future is Google+ and its latest social functionality, which Schmidt interestingly didn’t mention once during his talk or the question and answer portion.
Instead of talking social, Schmidt focused on the power of mobile and again reiterated that Android is in a leading position when it comes to mobile operating systems. The keynote even started out with a demonstration of Google’s Chrome browser for Android, which was released in beta a few weeks ago. Schmidt also suggested that the company is heavily focused on getting Android’s latest OS version, Ice Cream Sandwich, on as many devices as possible.
When asked about privacy concerns, Schmidt stated that you could easily use Google products anonymously and the choice you make depends on the type of functionality you’d like to see as a result of your usage. Basically, if you search using Google anonymously, the company can’t learn about your tendencies and interests, thus making its results weaker and less relevant for you.
I was pretty surprised that Schmidt wasn’t pressed more during the Q&A on hot subjects such as privacy and patents, but he did mention that he’s no longer the CEO of the company and doesn’t get as much information as he once did. He did however get a dig in at Apple stating that Google doesn’t just go around suing people “like other companies do”.


















Youtube has lost over 14 million users within the last 30 days and is in 7th place on updowners fastest dropping website list. This story needs to be covered!
Why? check the CNN
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Facebook
No! I want results for the whole web, not what Google guesses
I refuse to use Goggle search so, "oh, whatever". However, I think it's really bad for the web and the end user. The personalization bubble is the opposite of what's good about the web in the first place. It's a fascist move by the behemoth capitalist for control and manipulation of a walled garden by making the walls facilitate vanity. *spit*
"Oh yes" for more relevant results and more relevant ads "Oh no" for not reproductive results and privacy
Anything that Eric says I generally disagree!
i hate tracking my webventures. it's nobody's business where i go.
Oh Yes of course. Those who are affraid can still change their settings, browse in private mode (if using Chrome) or abandon Google as a whole. So what's the matter?
Oh no
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
oh yes AND oh no.
Definitely oh no (for me) as far as I can not turn it off (because I am not keeping cookies for example). Definitely oh yes talking about the trends / progress. Google knows what they do... I have actually started enjoying those +1`s SER from my network I see when I`m logged in. Sometimes it really helps to filter the crap. It`s another instance how to deliver the quality. Google knows...
To personalized via FB is effective but we Google what we don't know
"oh yes, oh oh no" U__U'
No! I google to see a variety of options that I would not have found on my own, not what it thinks I should see according to my records.
6th@
Google knows more about us than the Government unless.... wait for it... wait for it.... Google = Government??
Lets see
Google forgot ... Its not important to be more personalised but what matters is if its informative
Definitely "OH YES"!
Oh No Google...