If you’re an avid user of Google+, you’ve probably noticed that the tool bar that follows you around when using Google sites says “9+” in the top right sometimes, if you’re logged in.
That means that you have more than 9 notifications. I’m sure someone at Google took a long hard look at how we interact with numbers and found that if we saw more than 9, we wouldn’t pay attention. Or, it was just arbitrary.
Today, Google+ has removed the 9+, and replaced it with the actual number of notifications that you have on the service.
However, notifications on Google+ still suck. Bad.
It’s not how many notifications that matter
I’m not really interested in seeing every notification of every piece of activity on Google+. Notifications are an essential part of any social service. It’s the thing that brings us back, makes the service seem active, and makes us feel like we’re loved.
However, Google+ has failed to allow us to granularly control what we’d like to be notified about. For example, I’m not interested in finding out who has added me to a circle in real-time.
Oddly, Google+ does let you pick and choose which notifications you want emailed or texted to you, so it seems like half of the work is done. You can also choose which circles can notify you. That’s not really useful, because notifications should be by action type.
Seeing that little red number in the top right gives me heartburn. It makes me feel like I need to take attention away from what I’m doing, especially when I’m reading email. I’d like to simply customize them.
Since I have no control over these notifications, I have no idea what the pressing matter at hand is. Twitter doesn’t have this problem. You’re either followed, favorited, retweeted, or replied to. That’s it, and you can control those notifications from within Twitter’s suite of apps.
Facebook is similar in that it lets you choose what you’re notified about. For example, nine times out of ten, the events that I get invited to aren’t even in the city that I live in. So I shut them off.
Google+ is getting more and more active with over 44 million users, so I hope that they take another look at how they handle notifications. I just want to know if someone has commented on a post of mine. That’s it. If Google+ can do that, I’d probably end up using it more.
Maybe I’m the weird one, what do you think about notifications in general? Do they scare you away, or do they continually draw you back into a service, no matter what the notification is about? Let us know in the comments.





















Hopefully we'll still see more improvements to come though.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOK...can morons PLEASE stop showing their ignorance by claiming that Google+ has 44 million users as if sign ups and users are the same thing. WELL over half the people that signed up have not been back in over a moth. The estimated number of ACTUAL users is about 6 million. And that number is NOT growing.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJonatha Lol, you reek of stupidity and fanboyism. Don´t tell me, you want Google+ failing? you puny little dimwit - Go back to your blue cell.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJonatha Where exactly are you getting this information from? The Google+ I know and use is teeming with activity and interesting content.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikedashbyJonatha According to HitWise, there has been 6.8 millions *visits* last week. http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/2011/11/google_records_3rd_biggest_wee_1.html. So the actual number of US users that connect at least once in the week is lower than that.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJonatha I agree the number of active users is more important than these 44 registered accounts. Unfortunately, there is no standard metric nor official communication from Google.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJonatha that made me laugh, thanks.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOut of curiosity... have you used the Send Feedback feature? I ask because I don't want this article to have been an empty gripe.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeEarnest Pettie isn't this an obvious hole in the product though?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is exactly one of those prime usability issues I would like to see them tackle in their next update of Google+. Only last week I checked the settings pannel again if the option to disable some of those notifications had been added or not. So far, nothing yet. Facebook and Twitter introduced this lightyears ago. I cannot understand what is taking Google so long to make their platform more user friendly. This is a make-or-break world we live in.
On the other hand, if you're starting out a new platform, you want to give the impression that loads of things are happening. If you're counter always indicates "9+", you'll probably get the impression that there is a lot of activity.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeStijn Vogels Except that most people never even get to 9 since 95% of their circles haven't logged in since July
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJonathaStijn Vogels Oh please... you sound butthurt.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeStijn Vogels I like when people try to bring Facebook or other social network as to compare for the lacking fact of Google+´s missing features.
Here a hint - Google+ is not trying to be facebook, no a substitute of it, there.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likestb6 I understand very well that Larry Page is not trying to copy Facebook, but if he wants his social platform to succeed, there is no harm in following the best practices from other platforms. One example: Google+ has very easy privacy settings, and recently Facebook has launched similar features. Larry Page is very welcome to do whatever he wants with his platform. But if basic features like this remain missing, he will lose active members like myself and have only trolls like you left.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeStijn Vogels Google+ is trying to congregate Google as sole platform throughout all its product. Maintaining the simplicity is core to that, sorry, but if you're looking for a Facebook's substitute, Google+ is not it.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMaybe they could even use the four Google colors to classify the type of the notifications (e.g.: blue for comments to your posts, red for various types at once, yellow for people adding you to their circles and green for... you name it). Anyway, I'm sure this is just one of the many features that will improve with time :)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeraedwulf great idea.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGod, yes, exactly! Thank you for writing this, I think you're spot-on.
I was excited last month when they rolled out what few notification controls we currently have. Better than nothing, I guess, but I seriously NEED the ability to filter notifications by type, not by who they come from!
I should be able to tell this service that I do care whenever anyone uses my name in a post, but I don't want to hear about it every single time I'm added to someone's circles.
I am very hopeful that Google will give us greater control over notifications, as every element of the service seems well thought-out. It just doesn't scale well. My notifications have been borderline useless for months, and it's only getting worse.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeEarly days, still. Early days.
They still haven't fixed nicknames yet, and you want granular notification control? #nymwars
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMark 'Rizzn' Hopkins You can't hide behind "it is still young" for crap like this. This is something (like chat) that should have been implemented from DAY ONE. They had plenty of time to copy the successful sites like Twitter and Facebook. Which they did...but they didn't copy some very important features.
They will never GET to the "old days" at the rate in which traffic is dropping. I don't care HOW much money they have tied into it already, they are NOT going to keep throwing good money after bad, and cannibalizing their actually POPULAR services to keep trying (futilely) to prop up a failing social networking site.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJonathaMark 'Rizzn' Hopkins Troll detected. And a hater by the same way, get a life, Google+ is not going anywhere, watch out for your blue yard better.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMark 'Rizzn' Hopkins :) it's soooo basic Rizz.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like