A few days ago, Google CEO Eric Schmidt did a rather candid interview that was covered on the Telegraph website in the UK. Somewhere along the way, the majority of the media seemed to have missed it, but there were some very key points about Google’s mindset on products, and mobile in particular.
Probably most notable of his quotes was the following:
“We don’t have a plan to beat Apple, that’s not how we operate. We’re trying to do something different than Apple and the good news is that Apple is making that very easy.”
The statement, made in reference to the 2.2 version of Android being rolled out shortly after the launch of iPhone 4, opens quite a few doors about the inner workings of Google. For one, as Schmidt is quick to point out, the business models are drastically different between the two companies.
“The Google model is completely open. You can basically take the software – it’s free – you can modify whatever you want, you can add any kind of app, you can build any kind of business model on top of it and you can add any kind of hardware. The Apple model is the inverse.”
Though Schmidt is also keen to point out that Google has been eyeing the mobile market for quite some time, and the market had only recently come to a point where it seemed logical for Google to strike.
And strike it has. Google, it seems, is working its way toward a semantic experience not only for search but for its mobile market as well. Schmidt points out that in the course of the next 5 years, the world will be consuming the majority of its content online. That consumption, says Schmidt, will happen “on devices that are live not static. The characteristics of these devices are that they know who you are, they know where you are, they can play video and they carry memory.”
So then back to the subject of Apple making Google’s job easier. The question, of course, is how this is fact. The answer is deceptively simple, and one that we’ve talked about before: Google is catering to a market that wants a more open platform.
The argument could be made, indeed, that Android is only open to an extent; that the approval process and release cycle puts it simply on par with iOS and not in a different class. But the other end of that story is what you can do with Android once it’s in your own hands. As Schmidt points out, you can modify it in any way that you want and that, it seems, is important enough to keep Android running strong.
What’s more? In a statement that is sure to strike to the heart of Apple, Schmidt makes a quip about the development process for Android, and for Google products in general:
“All of our testing indicates that the vast majority of people are perfectly happy with our policy. And this message is the message that nobody wants to hear so let me say it again: the reality is we make decisions based on what the average user tells us and we do check. And the reason that you should trust us is that if we were to violate that trust people would move immediately to someone else.”
While this speaks volumes about how Google does business in general, it also shows a more human side of the giant. Google seems to be acutely aware of the fact that the goal of keeping customers lies in keeping their trust.















nice article =)
The question is: how open is an ewnvironment where everything that Google offer supposedly as “free” has the huge cost of the total knowledgement about our life?! I have abandoned Google Buzz because they (Google Inc.) could make easy for everyone to seek my private content.
Apple is not a saint and possibly it will loss a good slice of the market. But Google is working easily to be a bigger brother than Microsoft once was.
you can say that for all social networking products. Judging by the popularity of facebook, most people don’t give a sh1t.
It seems that its not only Google, nobody really has the same business model as Apple – they are in a league of their own, for better or for worse.
ya, do something different than apple… like make an OS for a mobile phone that copies Apple’s OS… and then a touch screen interface, just like Apple’s… and then an App Store just like Apple’s….
what ever Eric… I hope you think flat out copying is not “evil” so you can sleep at night…
iOS is not open source, Android is open source, do you understand the term of open source ? If not better keep quiet and dont expose your limited knowledge.
so it is ok for apple to copy Amazon in selling digital books, but somehow a mistake for Google to copy Apple and do it better lol. Man you are great. You are the direct incarnation of a hypocrite.
it’s even worse than that. In 2005, while in Apple’s board, Schmidt quietly bought a small startup named Android… We can safely assume that he was fully aware of the begining of the complex work that Apple started at this very moment : the Iphone project.
It’s not only a matter ok copying but rather a plain and simple of betrayal.
It’s like Apple invented something new. Apple copied others and violated tons of patents, but I agree Apple made it better.
Invention always been based on something that was invented by someone else.
Ya Apple makes your job easy. All you gotta do is weasel your way onto their board of directors, steal everything they worked tirelessly to create, then give it away free in return for the lions share of the market. Smart thinking Eric!
Apple invented nothing. For instance: they stole their wysiwyg style OS from IBM where Steve Jobby had a summer job in the 70s.
Oh my… It wasn’t IBM, it was Xerox Duh! And yes, he was inspired by it, but if you know anything of history, even a screenshot from that time, you can tell the difference in the systems. The point is, human interface, and apple is always in the front lead of these matters, even tho so many people copy them.
Apple’s main advantage is that they focus on what the human mind can grasp. Google can sometimes focus too much on technology, ending up with products that not everybody can appreciate.
That’s what’s keeping me from abandoning my iPhone for an android phone. I don’t want all my personal info shared through ‘the cloud’ regardless of my privacy settings.
Google owns too many parts of the web to make your information really private. Apple’s apps are all self-contained and operate within a solid walled garden.
If you don’t share anything, why would any of your data be in the cloud? The concern for cloud is not privacy, it’s security.
good artists copy, great artists steal.