Today saw the Silicon Valley Comes To Tech City event take place in London. As part of a wider initiative called Silicon Valley Comes To The UK, organized by LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman and angel investor Sherry Coutu, it was designed to give existing and future entrepreneurs advice to help them build Britain’s next generation of tech businesses.
Among the discussions and interviews in the program was the session on product design, featuring IDEO‘s Tom Hulme, Adam Nash and DJ Patil of VC firm Greylock Partners, and Last.fm‘s Matthew Hawn. The panel had some fascinating insights into the importance of design to a product’s success.
The bar has risen – users expect great design
Adam Nash talked about how there’s been a resurgence in appreciation of design in consumer products. This is a challenge for designers because the bar has risen fast on the quality of design that is expected.
While the general public may not understand how to create a great design, they’re developing a taste for what works. As Matthew Hawn added, delighting people with design can be crucial to a product’s success.
Data and emotion is key to understanding your users
So, how do you make sure that you delight your users? Nash discussed how analysing data was vital – peruse all the data you can in order to understand how your product is being used. DJ Patil and Tom Hulme sang the praises of ’Narrative Design’. This process involves imagining the story of how a user discovers a product and learns to use it. Mapping out a user’s journey through the product, and discussing his or her emotions as they use it is another technique, used often in the US but not so much in the UK, which can also help identify the best design decisions.
Hawn discussed how Last.fm, traditionally engineering led, is becoming more design focused, and sending engineers and designers out to meet end users to really understand first-hand how they use the service, what they need and how that can be best achieved. While it may be tempting to send product managers or others at the company out to research users, today’s panel was agreed that those actually developing the product need to do it if they are to have a true sense of who they’re building for.
…but don’t hand over your vision to your users
However, you shouldn’t necessarily let information from users override your own vision. As DJ Patil put it, “Don’t let the GPS drive you into a lake.”
A former LinkedIn executive, Nash explained that in the early days of the social network for professionals, some early users wanted to take it in directions that would ultimately have been bad for it.
For example, building in a feature for creating mailing lists of users may have been handy for some, but it would have resulted in the service being full of sales people with no-one to sell to – who wants to use a service that helps others send you unsolicited messages?
Staying true to the core vision of a social network for professionals helped the team filter through conflicting feedback from some of LinkedIn’s keenest early users.
Designer co-founders
Tom Hulme pointed out the lack of startups founded by designers in the UK. He cited Airbnb, Posterous, Tumblr and Flickr as just some of the US startups co-founded by designers – the feeling amongst the panel was that having a designer at the heart of the company was incredibly beneficial to ensuring that a design-focused ethos was engrained in the startup’s DNA.


















I could not agree more with Tom Hulme about the value that a design co-founder can bring. The value that design focus brings to the company is a unified story and experience. If you don't have a design co-founder, the team will very easily (and quickly) focus on function and build feature lists. These are important, but premature and focusing on them risks that the product doesn't solve a consumer problem or fit an opportunity. The functions and features need to map back to value. Value identification (or the 'why') is a process that needs to include developing the story of why people would use the product, or what I call the 'product story'.
A while ago, there was a great thread on Quora about whether you should have a technical or design co-founder. I was so passionate about this that I turned my answer into an article for UX Magazine, you can read it here if you're interested ... "Why We Need Storytellers at the Heart of Product Development": http://uxmag.com/articles/why-we-need-storytellers-at-the-heart-of-product-development
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likesarahdoody ye totally, personality is something severely lacking in most identities online or with the majority of brands, only a few are awakening and those who don't will remain in a coma.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe SVC2UK team have posted the video of the panel up this morning: http://thul.me/svsaEW
Tom / @thulme
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDesign is certainly important yet users will not spend more time on or use more often your web portal (this article seems to be more service oriented than product) because of the design.
If your service brings value to users, certainly along with great ergonomics, you'll attract and retain users. Personally, Twitter for instance does not have the best design ever (same for Facebook actually) yet the value or perceived value is fantastic to its users because the service is great.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeibtikarati One of things we discussed on the panel yesterday was that product design isn't about just making the product "pretty" or sleek ergonomically. It's not something that comes at the end of your development process when its time to put the front end on what you've built. It's about understanding the human and emotional factors from the beginning of the process and incorporating them into every aspect of the flow and journeys your users will follow as they engage your product.
Often those touch points start or end outside of the actual product experience you control. Adam Nash had a great example about how they met with a guy who used eBay to buy and sell motorcycle parts. The painful process this guy went through to get his parts up on the site - taking photos, getting the lighting right, getting the camera to connect with his PC- was elaborate and painful. IAnd while none of that was directly involved with using the ebay site, understanding the struggles normal people have around the whole process changed the product decisions the eBay team were making.
So to say that design won't have any effect on how long or how often users will engage with your product is just wrong. It will have profound effects on engagement and how people connect with your product emotionallt. I'd go so far as to say that it will be the single largest factor in whether or not your product is ultimately successful. For me, great product design is about the elegant integration of amazing services and technology into a story or journey that makes it both useful and delightful. When it's done right, it's not just about the external surfaces but goes right to the core of what you build.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likematthew agreed
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeGreat article! Users are the ones that are going to spend 5 to 10 hours using your website so you have to make it a pleasant experience.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI could not have said it better myself! For some unknown reason, interviewers are looking for old samples of presentations, and I keep telling them that to stay competitive I have to show new and creative samples with a good storyline, that flows and evokes emotion. Boston.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIDEO rule the world!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAmen.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Twitter
KhalidLafi HamadKA that is why I usually outsource the design part :)
level343 Appreciate the RT, thanks! :)
FlowInteractive latest funding http:\/\/t.co\/3DhQvzzr http:\/\/t.co\/3DhQvzzr
mitchlowe also, if haven't already, Tim Brown's (IDEO) Change by Design--also abt root of innovation, design thinking
mitchlowe You'd enjoy this book, esp. Speaks essay abt difference btw 'problem-solving' and 'innovation' http:\/\/t.co\/hfx3fIAs
Conversation from Facebook
I agree, but great design with terrible functionality and bad PR = fail.
Yes!
Yes, I agree.
Awesome!
Absolutely. It starts with a great first impression.
Yes, and we're on top of it