The phrase, “This message will self-destruct in # seconds” resurfaces old memories of my favorite childhood cartoon, Inspector Gadget. In the cartoon series, secret messages were sent to Inspector Gadget, meant to be read only within a certain time period before comically exploding, thus rendering the contents useless for enemy spies.
A social media iOS app called “Vibe“ provides this exact same service, though with a few additional and helpful features. Through Vibe, users are able to communicate anonymously through the platform while deciding on how long these messages will exist — anywhere from 15 minutes to forever — before disappearing. Additionally, the Vibe community can also choose how geographically far this message can travel, enabling them to limit the amount of users who can see the message by location.
Revolutionaries of Occupy Wall Street, a New York City protest for American revolution, are already making quick use of Vibe. NYDailyNews reports that the innocent smartphone app is currently being used by protestors to share thoughts on the event with discussions around police brutality and arrests. Vibe’s creator, Hazem Sayed — who goes by the name of White Hat in the app — adds that since people can hide under the guise of pseudonyms, their identities and conversations can be protected without fear of repercussions.
Anonymous platforms can easily be abused.
Potential issues with this sort of service have already been pointed out. AnyBeat’s Chief Morality Officer, John Halcyon Styn, has already mentioned that lack of transparency could be dangerous. Knowing that anonymous users might be able to use tools like Vibe to organize and provide potentially harmful or dangerous information — and all without facing consequences — is a huge risk.
In Zuccotti Park, the protesters’ vibes are being projected in real time onto an upturned mattress. The projector is hooked up to an iPad on a tall stand. Some nights, cops allow the projector to stay on; other nights, the protesters are forced to turn the projector off.
Social applications like Vibe that were originally meant to be used in helpful ways — Sayed suggests organizing flash mobs or asking silly questions through the service, for example — don’t always end up working out quite the way they were intended. Even social platforms like Twitter, Facebook and Blackberry Messenger (BBM) were recently used to organize and coordinate some of the pillaging in the London riots.
This is, of course, a heated topic of discussion even for platforms like Google+ that rely on real names rather than pseudonyms to identify its growing community. App creators like Sayed already recognize the lack of anonymity online, and state that being able to protect our identities through a nameless veil is what makes the Internet and online world so great in the first place.
Knowing the above, I encourage your thoughts: Are anonymous-sharing apps like Vibe a good or a bad thing? Realizing that these sort of services can potentially be abused a la London Riots, are you for or against them? And if for, how can these services be used in a positive way? Weigh in below.


















When did vibe start? Does anyone know?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYou must be young. The phrase, "this message will self destruct..." originated back in the 60 on the very popular TV series "Mission Impossible".
And please spare us the hand wringing about illegal acts. Everything can be misused or abused, it's not a reason to denigrate it. Teach a child to walk and you give him the capacity to kick his mother.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like"Knowing that anonymous users might be able to use tools like Vibe to organize and provide potentially harmful or dangerous information — and all without facing consequences — is a huge risk."
Information cannot be harmful or dangerous. Only what people choose to do with it can be. It is up to each person to be personally responsible for their actions.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWilliam Bracey Information can be compelling and can have consequences. Yelling fire in a crowded place is just communicating information (whether true or not), but it's still dangerous.
That said, I don't really see any issues with a service like this. If the police are concerned, they really ought to be listening in on it the way anyone can. If this weren't around, something else would prop up to replace it. Better to have it around and know about it than try and cut it off.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNicolas Zea
I can't think of an equivalent to yelling fire in a theater here though. This is the internet, not a physical location where people can trample each other. If someone sends me misinformation and I act on it, that's on me for not verifying the information before acting. If someone tells me to do something wrong or even illegal, I still have the choice of whether to act upon it. If I decide to act, I should accept the consequences of my actions. Trying to place blame on the person that sent the message is deflecting personal responsibility.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWilliam, I agree with your followup comment. William Bracey Nicolas Zea
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI think it's great that there is a safe, anonymous way to communicate, particularly considering the controversial police brutality aspect of the current Occupy Wall Street protests. Also, now that the web is so open that it's difficult to separate your work life from your personal life, sometimes it's easier for protesters to be anonymous rather than to show that side of themselves to colleagues, family, etc who may not share their views. The Guy Fawkes mask is being increasingly used for similar reasons: http://thehipstereffect.com/2011/09/17/from-che-to-v/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThis is really interesting, Cheri.
Interesting timing especially... This service is emerging at the time when we are increasingly becoming made aware of the power being held by those who control the online world and increasingly concerned about privacy and use of our data with tracking, targeted adverts etc.
This service clearly wants to prove that social media doesn't have to be like that and offer opportunities for freedom of expression that might be considered lost.
That's incredibly valuable and a very interesting offering.
Unfortunately, after what happened with the London riots, I think a lot of people would choose to get rid of services like this if there was even the slightest chance of facilitating a riot or other violent event.
Whilst I value the concept, it has to be considered a bad thing. The minority ruins it for everyone!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAgreed. Sarah Ahmed
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like