TNW Apps

Real Time Voice Translation is On the Way, Thanks to Google.

baby talking on cell phone 280x280 Real Time Voice Translation is On the Way, Thanks to Google.Real time voice translation is on the way and Google aims to pioneer it.

The Internet giant wants to develop its smartphone technology to translate speech in real time.

The company would combine its advanced voice recognition know-how with its text translation service to create a mobile phone that acts as an instant interpreter.

Head of translation services Franz Och said: “We think speech-to-speech translation should be possible and work reasonably well in a few years’ time.“Clearly, for it to work smoothly, you need a combination of high-accuracy machine translation and high-accuracy voice recognition, and that’s what we’re working on.”

‘Everyone has a different voice, accent and pitch,’ said Mr Och. ‘But recognition should be effective with mobile phones because by nature they are personal to you.’

Google has already created an automatic system for translating text on computers, which is being honed by scanning millions of multi-lingual websites and documents.

However Google admits speech will be an even tougher challenge than text but says a customer’s phone would adapt to its user by ‘learning’ their style of talking.

Source: The Times

Zee Editor In Chief, The Next Web Network
Based in London, Zee is Editor in Chief of The Next Web. Follow him on Twitter and Facebook.

  • Translation software has come a long way in the last few years so I'm not surprised to hear about this. Between some languages it might actually work reasonably soon.
  • Remush
    > about "enormity of the task"

    To tackle such a difficult problem, one usually builds a model that is able to solve a simpler problem, and one gathers experience from that model.

    They would learn a lot by trying to translate from Esperanto to English.
    1) Esperanto is a language that is easier to analyse, so the main difficulty will lie in the second part of the translation process.
    2) If point 1) works satisfactorily, one can then try with another target language.
    3) The next step should be to translate from Esperanto to English.
    4) If it appears too difficult to find a good solution for another source language, we will still have something that works with Esperanto.
    5) Even if the translation to Esperanto does not give satisfaction, it won't be too difficult for a human to correct it, and produce a text that can be automatically translated to other languages (assuming step 2) was realized).

    If translating from and/or to Esperanto proves too difficult, then it is hopeless to attempt to translate from/to another language.

    There is a lot of documentation about that under google:"DLT Distributed Language Translation"

    What seems to have a chance of success is the "brutal force" approach. It can succeed in situation when the corpus is limited to a particular domain and there are a lot of translations available already.

    Remuŝ
  • That's cool! I had that idea about 8 months ago. I even specified google translate. http://bit.ly/5b3N72
  • Sounds too good to be true but its long ahead us. The email translation is still primitive so imagine...
  • Good Luck
    All I have to say is good luck with that! Have you ever called a company which uses voice activation/recognition whatever, they cannot even understand the English language much less work with other languages and dialects.
  • fuck
    fuck
  • almostinfocus
    I wish Google well and, as I Google Voice user, I hope they achieve their goals. But considering how mangled and inaccurate the transcribed Google Voice messages are, I think we have a long wait until this is ready.
  • jrwone
    “Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincident that anything so mindbogglingly useful could have evolved purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as a final and clinching proof of the nonexistence of God.”
    “The argument goes something like this: ‘I refuse to prove that I exist,’ says God, ‘for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing.’
    ” ‘But,’ says Man, ‘the Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn’t it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don’t. QED.’
    ” ‘Oh dear,’ says God, ‘I hadn’t thought of that,’ and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.
  • im excited about this!

    http://doublequoted.com
  • Douglas McGary
    Maybe, with them developing this type of technology, they should look at acquiring babelfish.
  • uupinko998
    Wow, is Google amazing or what. I think Google should run for President.

    Jess
    www.private-surfing.be.tc
  • Wow.
    I look forward to hilariously mangled voice conversations.
  • As a professional literary translator, I can tell they have completely misunderstood the nature of human language. It is not very logical (perfectly logical languages may be good enough for computers, but not for people – goodbye, Loglan!), and it’s basic unit is not the word but the phrase; and constructing a complete list of phrases just isn’t possible. Esperanto seems to have found the best balance in so far between logics and humanity.
  • Bill Chapman
    I wish Google well but, as a linguist, I'm not convinced that they are aware of the enormity of the task that faces them. I advocate a non-technological solution, i.e. wider use of the planned international language Esperanto. At least we know that works.
  • BernardoVerda
    Some further thoughts:

    Is this really the answer? Or even a good answer?

    This sounds to me like another case of trying to implement a technological solution to a non-technical problem. It's worth asking whether this is really the right approach.

    How well is this going to work trying to chat up a girl in a foreign bar, on a foreign beach or on the bus?

    How well is this going to work to negotiate an informal agreement, striking a deal in the corridor, or mutually feeling out one's opposite number around the coffee-service?

    And how sure can you really be that the technology has accurately conveyed the meaning -- let alone connotation and nuance -- you wanted to get across?

    It should also be considered how well this is -- or isn't -- going to allow for privacy, in a world where e-mail is already routinely scanned and indexed by both commercial and government entities (including Google itself, and the US and the Chinese governments, just for starters)? Would you trust this system when negotiating an important business deal, consulting on legal matters, etc?

    Perhaps something like Esperanto -- which has been around for well over a century and shown to work quite well in practice -- deserves a fresh look.
  • Mono
    Just use english and STFU!
  • Brian_Barker
    Google's "Babel Fish" translator will in never solve the language problem. Not only does it discriminate against anyone who cannot afford a mobile phone, but against minority language groups as well.

    There are 6,800 languages worldwide, not fifty-two !

    Moreover, if I met a native in Borneo, and he said to me in Hakka "I've lost my mobile phone" how would I understand him :)

    And how many starving Africans can afford a mobile phone !

    As English loses its economic power, the answer is not for us to move to Mandarin Chinese, but to Esperanto which puts all speakers on an equal footing.

    Have a look at http://www.lernu.net or http://www.esperanto.net
  • Are you cunning?
  • Where are some working examples of usage of Esperanto? I'm not aware of any.
    http://jimasks.me/could-you-fall-in-love-with-s...
  • BernardoVerda
    Well, here's one example (chosen at random -- because I was looking at this particular Esperanto-language Wikipedia article about the Alaskan Goldrush quite recently):
    http://eo.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaska_orimpetego

    Here's another, from the Esperanto version of Le Monde Diplomatique,
    (again, just because it's in my browser history already):
    http://eo.mondediplo.com/article1566.html

    The regular Radio Poland Esperanto podcast:
    http://www.polskieradio.pl/eo/

    And a Polish Esperanto Youth-group's web-site
    http://viavento.republika.pl/esperante.htm
    and their regular podcasts and videos:
    http://www.podkasto.net/
    http://viavento.republika.pl/aktuale/vvfilm.htm

    The Esperanto translation of Darwin's "Origin of the Species"
    -- the online version (much easier to read than Google Books):
    http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/klivo/origino/en...

    That should be plenty to give you an idea. And we haven't even touched on fiction, literature or poetry...
  • Try the 'Internacia Kalendaro' of meetings using Esperanto almost on a daily basis around the world right here, if you don't believe it!:
    http://www.eventoj.hu/
    or listen to the daily Esperanto blog from Radio Polonia:
    http://www.polskieradio.pl/eo/
  • It sounds like a tough task...but I have two words for you...Street View. If they can do that....
  • Well, Google can't be pioneers as Interlecta have been doing this for years on multiple mobile platforms.
blog comments powered by Disqus