There are a few apps on my iPhone that are there just to show other people how cool the iPhone is. They aren’t useful really, except that when people want to see the iPhone they make for a great demo. Examples for me are Weather HD, CardFlick, Compass, Heart Rate and a few games that have great graphics but which I never actually play.
It seems to me that Siri is slowly entering this area of ‘nice to show but not actually useful’. I know a quite few people with an iPhone 4s and I asked around a bit and they all almost regretfully acknowledge that they, in fact, don’t really use it anymore, once you get beyond the newness of it all.
The commercials look great and in the beginning you can still find the patience to play and experiment with it. But then reality kicks in and you find out that Siri is just too slow and although it’s probably the best voice recognition on any mobile platform, it still isn’t good enough to always understand what you mean.
It reminds me of Apple’s earlier attempt at voice recognition, called PlainTalk. It came pre-installed with with System 7 on Apple’s Quadra line of computers and it looked awesome:
I remember being excited about the technology at the time and trying it out for the first time. It worked, sorta. You had to speak LOUD and CLEAR and there was a few second delay before the computer seemed to react. 8 out of 10 times the command wasn’t recognized and I would have to repeat the sentence. Within minutes it became very clear that just typing the command or clicking the mouse was more efficient and a lot faster.
After that the only times I used PlainTalk was when I wanted to show off the capabilities of my computer. Which brings me back to the iPhone, and Siri. I know that Siri is light years ahead of PlainTalk. It is just so much more than just speech recognition. But ‘m still wondering how useful it is once you get beyond the thrill of seeing it work.
Lets find out how Siri is doing, if it is really being used, or whether it is time to say goodbye:
The Siri commercial, so you can compare it to the PlainTalk commercial.


















I don't find Siri is useful for Non-American users. It's extremely bullshit for me. Thought I manage to make it understand what I was talking about, most of the time I can't work with anything other than the default apps like calls, alarms etc. I am pretty fast working with touch and type rather than making N number of corrections with Siri.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSiri is still like a child... It's in its infancy, but it's growing and it's growing fast ! The future looks very bright for it especially on the "home automation" / "Intelligent home" side of things... So be sure of it, it's not going to die that soon ! :) Just give it time to grow, it's an artificial intelligent being and it's still very young, but it's evolving and maturing... Slowly but surely !!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI only use siri to set my alarm at night.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhile Siri is not fully functional in Canada, for maps etc, I do use it for quick things like setting alarms. I can see it being more useful once it goes full bore. Keep in mind that this is just 1.0 gadgetgreg
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHmmm...the poll would suggest otherwise. Though I don't use it in the typical, "ask a question and wait for an answer" way very often, I use it many times a day to dictate Texts, tweets and short emails. I think that this is where the rel usefulness lies.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Liketo say it's the best on any platform I think is a mistake. google has a very impressive voice command.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMendel Kurland Yes, Google has a very impressive voice command. However, to claim that it is even NEAR being on par with Siri's actual capability is just plain silly.
I've just got an iPhone4 and don't plan on upgrading til the 6 though.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI've thought about this often and have come to realize that the "beta" part is more important than we sometimes realize. I sometimes get the sense that Siri is a pilot project for gathering data and information en masse so that it can be applied to the technology to give us something that qualifies as a 1.0 release. For what Siri is, the only way to get that data is to have millions of people using it, hence the uncharacteristic act of Apple releasing an open beta. I think Siri won't really be Siri until the first major revision.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe plain fact of the matter is Siri is too slow for how fast the human operates. The only way to fix it was if Siri could read your mind.
I'm pretty sure Apple is already working on that for iPhone 6 or something.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMarques Baxter Siri is a heckuvalot faster for me when I'm cooking and my hands are mostly dirty. Holding a button for two seconds, speaking my text message, and sending it with my voice while I'm working with food is much faster than having to wash my hands, dry my hands, tap everything out, and then get dirty again.
Then there's using your voice instead of hands while driving, walking the dogs, running, using a second device simultaneously, and more. There are a lot of use cases that make voice control much more convenient than the alternatives. It just takes a little thinking outside the box, just like switching from physical keyboards to virtual, from regular phones to smartphones, and from CLIs to GUIs.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMarques Baxter Siri is meant to be just another input method. It's NOT meant to be THE ONLY input method. Sometimes typing is faster. Sometimes speaking is faster. They are simply offering you a solution to every situation you could find yourself in while using your phone. Siri is also great because if gives you an input method based on how you are feeling too. If I am feeling lazy and don't want to type, or I injured my hand, or I don't have hands because I am handicap, then I can still perform tasks with my phone.
That is the point of Siri. It doesn't seem like you are thinking about this correctly...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMeh, the Bloomberg article has less detail than this article. In the real world, you don't see people using Siri on a regular basis except in private making goofy requests just to see what it says.
Of course you can never tell an Apple fanboy this.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI love when my predictions are fulfilling :)
I'm more effective using shortcuts than to start the voice command and waiting for detection.
"Siri show me the weather","...".
Click on icon Weather... Opens Google, location detection, showing the weather ... well well...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeA brief amount of research would surely have led you to official reports from network operators like this one in Bloomberg, which cites Siri as the primary reason for why iPhone 4S owners use twice the data of iPhone 4 owners:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-06/apple-s-voice-recognition-siri-doubles-iphone-data-volumes.html
People are using Siri. A lot. You might not. Your friends might not. But on a statistical graph of all iPhone 4S owners, you and your friends basically get rounded down to nothing. This is why good pieces might lead with an anecdote to rope folks in, but then are based on actual research and facts.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likechartier The Bloomberg article doesn't necessarily prove that Siri is the reason why 4s owners use twice the data of iPhone 4 owners. This was brought up here(http://mashable.com/2012/01/06/iphone4s-data-consumption/) on the article and in the comments.
Are you sure people are using Siri alot? Do you statistics for how many people are using Siri. The Bloomberg article doesn't either. You can't blame the writer for generalizing when you generalize.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMarques Baxter So let's throw out all of the articles that either of us could find on the web. As a freelance writer who's spent time on staff at a couple of publications, I can tell you: anecdotes cannot serve as the thesis of a story, and they're weak sauce even for an editorial.
Anecdotes are a great lede to catch attention and setup the larger point, but they have to be backed up with _something_. There are 37 million iPhone 4S owners out there who have access to Siri. "Me and a couple friends" is statistically zero, and a ridiculous, hyperbolic justification for "saying goodbye" to a brand new feature that isn't even out of beta yet.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikechartierMarques Baxter But the author of the article doesn't really make any claims about people not using it. Instead he uses his anecdotes to illustrate his own usage of Siri and poses the question "Do you still use Siri?", in attempt to get some actual statistics. What is wrong with that?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikechartierMarques Baxter Reminds me a bit of a quote I heard recently about confirmation bias and how people always believe that their sliver of the population represents the whole. It was about the Presidential elections of 1860, about which a prominent anti-Lincoln pundit said "I don't know how Lincoln got more votes. All my friends voted for John Bell."
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI use it all the time, mostly for adding reminders, calendar events and dictating quick texts/emails. Once the API is open and 3rd party apps can tap into it, I expect usage to skyrocket. To be able to control Spotify, Twitter, Facebook and others via voice will make it much more useful than just the core iOS apps.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhy are we saying good-bye to a beta project that hasn't even had a 1.0 release yet? That is like being annoyed that GMail didn't do everything you wanted when it first came out and you wanted to give up on it before it ever got out of beta.Is it really that slow of a news day? Don't you have something better you could be reporting on instead of starting flamewars?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIt is great for "I found N items in your area. N-2 of them are close to you" even if that wasn't your initial command.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSiri optimization, I wrote about it 3 months ago, wil beome more and more important http://www.adfiliate.nl/seo/siri-optimalisatie/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI Use it to set appointments, but then I go in to the calender and make sure it's correct..Typical relationship, it's hard to trust her when you are just getting to know her.....
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeRich Glass Why do you check it?? It shows you the appointment right in your face on the Siri screen when you make it. What is there to check?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeBoth me and my dad use Siri for simple things like checking the weather, setting alarms, timers, finding each other on a map, etc. We'd use it even more if directions worked in our country, or if more of our communication was in English or German (that's the languages me and my dad use Siri in, respectively). Siri totally has potential, it just needs polish. Mat Honan of Gizmodo rightfully pointed out some flaws in it (http://gizmodo.com/5864293/siri-is-apples-broken-promise), but they are nothing that couldn't be addressed in future updates. Maybe Apple did this intentionally, to make something truly amazing and impressive while leaving room for improvement. Kinda like the first iPad.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI really only use it to put in Calendar appointments and call people. One of this issues with the question of weather we are still using Siri is that not all of its features are live outside the US (i.e. if I ask Siri for directions I get the response "Sorry, I can't provide maps and directions in Canada) . I'd be willing to bet that people living outside the US would find it more useful/compelling if all the geo-loaction features were available.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI love it.. i've used it to dictate a 3 page article and it was almost flawless despite my slight dutch accent. Also it's brilliant for requesting numbers of people living in a country/city, etc.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThe only time I've wanted to use it was when I was driving, but I had no internet access so it didn't work.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI actually use Siri to write texts whilst I'm walking to work every day. Saves getting my hands out in the cold, and it's getting pretty good at recognising my voice..
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI think it's not just about the voice recognition being inaccurate, but also a lot of times when you want to use it (especially when you are in public), you don't want to speak to your phone in front of other people.
E.g. on a crowded train!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJeremy Bonney Put it to your ear. Siri will open automatically, and you will just look and sound like talking <i>on</i> the phone, not <i>to</i> the phone.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeKsbjAJeremy Bonney IF you turn that setting on. You have to turn on that option in the settings FIRST.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Facebook
Yes. Saying a website name beats trying to type it with your thumbs.
Unfortunatly.... For you i do
I use it to say my texts. It couldnbe way better
only the fanboyz will use it
Love it when I'm in my car
Totally useless
yes, please! =)
I use it, but needs to be improved greatly.