When Apple announced that iOS 5 would launch with support for its own communication service iMessage, it seemed to be a clear cut stab at the heart of one of the carrier’s biggest money makers, text messaging. It was immediately obvious that this should have a huge impact on how carriers of the iPhone would be charging for these services in the future.
Now it’s three months after the launch of iOS 5 and the new iPhone 4S, both of which have had time to make an impact on the volume of messages being charged for by the carriers and those being sent for ‘free’ using iMessage. But has it?
According to a great piece by Jenna Wortham at The New York Times today, it has. She shares some of her usage numbers and concludes that there has indeed been a dip in the amount of text messages that are being sent through the carrier’s system, at least in her case.
I’ve long been fascinated by the impact this would have on the carrier ecosystem and have written about the way that it could change the way that the carriers charge for services in a big way.
So I decided to do a bit of a roundup of my usage along with my coworkers Drew Olanoff and Brad McCarty. I also grabbed some numbers shared on Twitter by World of Apple’s Alex Brooks.
This first chart is mine. You’ll notice that there was a drop when iOS 5 was released in October, but the biggest fall didn’t happen until my friends had a chance to buy an iPhone 4S or perform an upgrade, something ‘normal’ users are typically slower to do.
The change since then has been striking though, and the chart as of the same period in 2010 reflects the same numbers you see here in August and September. It seems evident that the people that I communicate with are also iPhone users and upgraded fairly quickly.
This next chart is Drew’s and shows the same downward trend, although it slopes more gradually. It’s likely that the people he communicates with have more diverse phone tastes and have not adopted it as fast, although they definitely have. The arrow for Christmas rush indicates when people went on a buying spree for the new iPhone, with the results showing up in January.
Alex’s graph shows a similar trend with a large drop into November, also indicating a high adoption rate among the people he messages the most. Note that Alex adopted the beta in July but saw no real effects of it as there wasn’t anyone else in his circle running iOS 5 at the time.
At this point it’s clear that the graphs of text message usage on traditional carriers are going to do nothing but slope downward at this point. In fact, they’re running scared, with AT&T already instituting new plans that are more aggressively priced in order to close the gap.
Don’t think that AT&T will be the only carrier to attempt to get their pound of flesh while they can either. Expect every major carrier that offers the iPhone to split up plans like Ma Bell in order to offer a measly amount at the lower end and a beefy higher quantity plan, without many options in between.
Frankly, this change can’t come soon enough for me. SMS messages get sent on the control channel of your normal phone line, a segment of the connection normally used for diagnostic data.
This should make them free with any service that you already pay for but because of contracts and the relatively small choice of carriers in a given area, we get charged magnitudes more for messaging than we should.
Anything that breaks that status quo and forces a change for the better is good for everyone, not just iPhone users. For now, the carriers are battening down the hatches and trying to squeeze out the last drop of blood, but they can’t do it forever. The closer we get them to dumb pipes, the better off we’ll be.





















Open Source: code through charity, philanthropy, integrity
Find a free public XMPP server to your liking:
http://www.jabberes.org/servers/
http://xmpp.org/resources/public-services/
It is wholly FOLLY to install a proprietary (likely malware) "chat" alternative app on your mobile device -- such as text"plus", textfree, whatapp, echoup, kakao, kik, tigertext, heywire, textnow, groupme, textie. Most of the software in the android market is MALWARE claiming to be freeware. If an app shows an internet ad it is NOT-free in any sense of the word free. ALL adware is malware (that's bad, very very bad). Apps with internet ads are PRIVACY RAPE FOR PROFIT
XMPP is modeled on the timeless awesomeness of IRC. XMPP provides one-on-one communication, or one-to-many communication via MUC (Multi User Chat).
While TextSecure, an android app to facilitate sms encryption, was recently re-released as Open Source; sms continues to be a legacy dead-end NOT-free technology.
XMPP OTR, Off The Record, not to be confused with privacy rape for profit gtalk feature of same name, allows the not so savvy user of technology to employ EASY forward secure chat not requiring the other participant to have a proprietary- or identical client.
XMPP GPG, jabber encrypted with public key cryptography, is available for the slightly more savvy users, provides much much stronger conversation encryption. Yes, the same GPG used for email conversation encryption.
One already pays for "mandatory" data package for a smart phone. It is the heighth of INANITY to additionally pay per message for legacy texting [sms]. Oh, your mobile plan has "free" unlimited texting? Yeah, well that "free" texting is contained in the monthly mobile fee. @GBTV ? xmpp replaces twitter, too
xmpp is not limited to a mobile device. ONE xmpp jid for MULTIPLE devices SIMULTANEOUSLY!
xmpp is faster than sms
xmpp is more secure than sms
xmpp is less costly than sms. xmpp is free.
xmpp is not more complicated than sms
xmpp is killing sms
xmpp is the ring to rule them all: integrate all other chatting technologies through xmpp transports and gateways
xmpp can facilitate jingle
xmpp can guarantee delivery (XEP-0184, XEP-0198)
xmpp can expire messages like tigertext (XEP-0079)
xmpp can be spam proofed
xmpp privacy management is simple yet powerful (XEP-0016)
xmpp is transparently employed by facetards... facebook
xmpp provides unlimited flexibility and feature expansion: XEP
xmpp is a mature stable technology endorsed by the heavy hitters of technology
sms messages are archived forever easily searched under the "patriot" act.
xmpp messages are not archived forever by mandate, and even if they were layers of encryption foils this government fascism
xmpp is also named jabber
http://jabber.org
http://xmpp.org
"The Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) is an open technology for real-time communication, which powers a wide range of applications including instant messaging, presence, multi-party chat, voice and video calls, collaboration, lightweight middleware, content syndication, and generalized routing of XML data"
gtalk is not a suitable implementation of xmpp and doubly inappropriate for privacy.
hotmail chat offers xmpp interoperability
aol chat offers xmpp interoperability
xmpp is all the rage at fosdem
http://fosdem.org
on android obtaining an xmpp client does NOT require google android market -- much as using an android phone does NOT require adding a gmail account to the device. Many fields of employment forbid use of gmail. Android users, rooted or not, can download xmpp clients from Open Source developers directly or from the http://F-droid.org repository (Many F-droid contributers work to eliminate privacy rape for profit. sadly the founder of f-droid lauds use of privacy rape technology for profit... his moral compass ought align with reality soon enough). Privacy is neither a commodity nor a currency.
awesome cross platform non-mobile xmpp clients include
Psi+ http://code.google.com/p/psi-dev
Pidgin http://pidgin.im
Gajim http://gajim.org
xmpp is ideal for BOTH personal- and business use
$$$$
Switching [your kids] from sms to xmpp can easily reduce your mobile bill by 25% to 70%.
xmpp is here to stay. My objective is to kill sms. I am not a fan of paying to receive unwanted messages. I would love to discuss strategy or evangelism:
XMPP:apologist@core.im/encrypted
when will you switch? who will you evangelize?
If you love your friends and family you will save them from sms
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likerrrr
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeevery free public XMPP server ought NOW offer XEP-0198 and every XMPP client ought support XEP-0184
Prosody, ejabberd, openfire are moving in the XEP-0198 direction. TextOne claims to have implemented a variation of XEP-0198 and continues to "promise" to release their technology as XEP to benefit the XMPP server/client [mobile] community. Are process one developers lazy or liars? hmmmm
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likehttp://text-one.com
TextOne offers a mobile focused free XMPP client on every 'smart' phone platform: apple, rim, android, etc
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeXMPP will obviously destroy SMS.
XMPP with OTR or GPG is the future. If you do not have an XMPP JID you are a luddite!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHow can something restricted to iPhone can replace something universal? This article is non sense
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhatsApp it is. Multi platform (also old Nokia's) and lots of features.
The only thing I really miss is a web client. That's a plus for Google Talk.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIMO, Google should add this in their next update. Not iMessage per se, but fully integrated TCP/IP based messaging INTO the SMS app just like iMessage. They could even purchase one of these companies (WhatsApp, etc.) that is doing it already to jump start their market penetration. Could they roll ads at the bottom to generate revenue? Hmm.. Then open source it to allow WP7, iOS & BlackBerry users to use it and you'll have a clear winner. Does anyone else share that opinion?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likewhat's app... anyone..... anyone?
Here in NL nearly everyone with a smartphone has it - don't know what the penetration is in other countries... but a messaging system that only works with iPhone... no thanks!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeEric Woning Chaton is a option
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeEric Woning the big difference is that it's hybrid, I don't have to open another app than the one I'm used to plus I automatically use SMS when texting with none-iphones (next to android, there's lots of people still out there with a dumb phone...)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI couldn't agree more Mr. Oscar Goldman. I am really liking your articles Matthew Panzarino. I have noticed a trend as well over the past few years that I would love to do a "bar graph" on... the amount of people that are openly saying the "F" word! So, cheer's Mr. Goldman. I will gladly join in your continued effort to express and give a big FUCK YOU to SOPA while I am it.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeiMessage is also killing the open nature of communication. Call me when Apple makes iMessage a standard messaging client. Until then - Kik and Whatsapp are doing a much better job.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAT&T will find a way to gouge you. Glad I left.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHOORAY. Apple has its problems and its anti-customer practices, but this is a huge win and much-deserved FUCK YOU to the phone companies.
HA HA HA! I was so looking forward to this.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likehell yeah, we shouldn't be paying for damn texing nowadays. Damn at&t doesn't want to throw in some free texting to my iPhone plan at all.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSmart phones and mobile IM clients will kill SMS -- no iPhone-only thingy required.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAT&T is pure greed. In every conceivable way.
http://attsmscashcow.com/
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhat about the effect of Facebook Messenger on text messaging? The intent of that was to get people to message people via FB rather than texting...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeStephen Feller
Normally I'd say anything that kills the text-messaging rip-off is great.
But screw Facebook-specific crap. If you want to communicate with someone, send a proper message instead of forcing him to dick around with Facebook.
At least Facebook now lets you reply to FB messages with an E-mail response, instead of forcing you to log in and hunt for the relevant thread in their shitty UI.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOscar GoldmanStephen Feller Facebook Messenger is a simple app with all your FB friends there already, you get a push notification when you receive a new msg, how is that forcing him to 'dick around with facebook'?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOscar GoldmanStephen Feller
Normally I'd say anything that kills the text-messaging rip-off is great.
But screw iOS-specific crap. If you want to communicate with someone, send a proper message instead of forcing him to dick around with iOS .
At least Google Talk now (as always) lets you reply to GTalk messages with an E-mail response, instead of forcing you to log in and quickly search for the relevant thread in their awesome UI.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMickstahOscar GoldmanStephen Feller iMessage works in exactly the same way as Text messaging, if the receiver has an iOS device it will automatically switch from Text messaging to iMessage. Which is better than Gtalk because they have to have joined Gtalk and have it set up to use it.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMickstahStephen Feller
Nice try... I guess? But that doesn't make sense. iOS is the entire phone interface, so I guess you bought the wrong phone if you didn't want to dick around with it.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeTom OakleyMickstahStephen FellerI understand that; apparently Stephen was confused.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOscar GoldmanStephen Feller *sigh* Parody loses so much on the Internet some times…
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Facebook
All day :)
Text+ does the same, but is cross-platform, and probably doesn't have a back door for the CIA/NSA.
The author realizes that Apphole is the #4 cell phone maker in the world with less than 5% total market share, right? I think ye olde sms has some life left in it.
I use Whatsapp more than both
Another US oriented piece and badly headlined
How can it be killing the text message? Overall IPhones make up a minority of phones globally and iMessage is specific to iOS.
Partially agree with Tim, as I can see that working great, but I'd say the more people on iPhone the better, they are simply the best.
Like any other system that is proprietary & single platform it's a #fail (BBM is, too) - "open" / cross-plattform wins! (fb, WhatsApp, ... or multimessagers like imo.im)
Yes! It is awsome!
Its not killing anything here in the UK... as with others I have Thousands of cross network text messages bundled... and iMessage is iOS specific.
Yes!
Didn't the BBM already kill it ages ago! They What'sApp took a stab at it too. The iMessage is doing what apple has been doing, taking credit for thinks already there.
I have an unlimited texting plan and love the colour ;)
'whatsapp' rocks!
apple the wannabe bbm
I never use it! but I think is Facebook Messenger that killing the text message!
iM for iOS only. But i have iOS, Android, Windows phones, PCs, MACs around me. I use facebook chat build into my windows phone messages hub. So i can chat with PC, with Mac, with windows phones, with iphones, etc.
Facebook is better for integration in all mobiles. Everybody has facebook.
Don't know anyone who uses it frequently, besides BBM and messaging apps such as WhatsApp have done away with text messaging long before iMessage
I certainly love it. Furthermore, I have SMS blocking as a feature on my plan. You can't send me a regular text message, period. However, between Google Voice, Yahoo! Messenger, and iMessage, there's really no problem here.
not that it really matters since most people with iphones have the unlimited texting plan to begin with
Yes!
LOVE it.