The moment has come and gone, and our collective post-hype hangover has arrived. This iPad that we were shown today was hardly what most of us wanted, and the letdown is reverberating around the internet.
And what does your humble servant think? In a nutshell, I am so disenchanted with the iPad that in under an hour I went from being fully open to buying one this evening, to having my wallet shut like a bra clasp on a poorly ending prom night.
I did not, ever, want a bigger iPod Touch. In fact, I never wanted an iPod touch. Apple seems to have ducked the responsibility of creating a new product category while claiming the opposite. No, indeed they opened Paint and hit the “Stretch/Skew” button on an image of a product they already had.
Before I get into my own laundry list of faults in the device, what do I like about it? Well, it does allow me to use Apps that I have already purchased. I enjoy saving money. It’s also about the right size, and the screen and processor are capable enough. And, we will get back into this, Apple did at least attempt to get the device to an acceptable price point. Let’s move on.
Getting right into it, the lowest price for the iPad point is a mirage. A non-expandable device that has a total of 16 gigabytes of storage? Assuming a usable 15 gigabytes of space, I can fit less than a third of my music onto the device. Excellent. And zero percent of my photos. And videos. And apps, of course. So to say that Apple has created a mass market tablet for $500 is a little disingenuous. The device is so crippled and hamstrung on the storage side, I cannot help but recall the comical four gigabyte first-tier iPhone. No one bought it, and Apple got to say that the phone “started at” a lower price point.
Even more so, the 3G enabled 16 gigabyte version costs some $130 more, so to have an actual internet-enabled device (more on that later, sorry to keep deferring) that works where you are, the price tag is higher. Again, the $500 price point is a mirage. Apple is merely using it to generate even more buzz around the device. Of course, it is nearly 100% likely that Apple floated the$1000 number, just so that they would look good today at their event. It works well, right? Apple floats a rumor. We write about it, creating controversy, only then to watch Apple swoop in and save us with a device that costs half the rumored amount. Oh, but no one is really going to buy that one, so the device does cost more. Apple wins, wins, wins, and then wins again.
We mentioned connectivity a minute ago, and that must be addressed. Apple, in the face of the opinions of every single iPhone owner in the United States, has chosen not just to stay with ATT, but to expand their offerings together. Also, the two plans are being offered are both jokes. 250 megabytes is an afternoon for most of us, especially if we are being encouraged to watch YouTube (but not with flash, more on that in a second). That means that we all need to get the $30 monthly plan. Not horribly priced for unlimited data, and it is nice to be contract free, but what will this do but overload ATT’s crap network even more? ATT cannot even handle the iPhone, let alone a legion of iPads sucking on its data pipes.
No flash. Come on, Apple, why are you still kicking this horse? No flash on the iPhone was barely tolerable. On a device that you call internet specific to not have flash is more than annoying, it’s insulting. Flash, love it or hate it, is one huge slice of the internet. This is not optional.
Guess which new mobile non-laptop Apple product cannot multitask? Well, all of them, but the iPad loses here as well. Even with an Apple designed chip, the iPad cannot handle what every other companies product offerings do already. You can of course jailbreak your iPhone and run things in the background, but not natively. Why not? Beats the hell out of all of us. Again, this problem is annoying on the iPhone, inexcusable on the iPad.
And just because the software is not flawed to hell does not mean that the hardware cannot be broken as well. It can! The iPad has no camera, meaning that many of the nifty things that you wanted to do on the device you cannot. Skype on the couch? No! Tinychat? No! Again, Apple, what were you thinking? That we don’t?
I am a bit let down. I suspect that you are as well. Perhaps version two is what we really wanted all along. See you all in a year.
—
I will round this out by quoting a number comments from the big story on Digg about the iPad. They sum it up well, and with more wit:
- “I am running out to buy pants with bigger pockets right now. Or does Apple have to license plus-size pockets as an official iPad accessory?
- Does anyone else feel it looks a little…well…botched? I mean take a look at the lock screen. That isn’t the Apple finish you normally see…
- 2001 called, they want their tablet PC back.
- iPad = Large iPhone
- Holy thick bezel, Batman!
- great, another way to look like a huge d*****bag in public
- How would you use that with multi-touch on your lap without dropping it on the floor constantly? Smaller than a laptop, bigger than an iPhone…good for what?
- And the best one: It’s a f****** UMPC!”
Image via Engadget.















You forgot a big one: The lack of support for USB. I might've actually bought this contraption (even with the lack of Flash) but not being able to use my external harddrives (because 16 gigs is less then my laptop had… TEN YEARS AGO!), charge my cellphone, hook up a wired keyboard (because Momma always said Bluetooth is the devil!), etc. etc. etc. etc. Why they're still using their “pin-whatever” system on the bottom of the device is a surprise to me.
The Ipad does less then the Iphone (no camera) and if this is Apple's answer to the netbook (which is what I was hoping this would be… considering it's about the size of a laptop screen) it should not run off the Iphone OS. Maybe they would've had to make it thicker, but it'd be worth it to get an actual OS on there so we could just install flash ourselves. I'm all for the design: A computer that is just a tablet… one half of a laptop with touch support, but it needs the computer part or I won't care.
I almost put USB in, but the post had run on so long, I cut it short. Thanks for bringing it up.
This makes me feel better about the Droid I bought last weekend. At least I can multi task and take great photos and I have keyboard and …
Yeah the iPad is a disaster. I think 16GB is enough for a lot of people though – I know it would be for me. But regardless, the last thing I want is a huge iPod touch. And that's ALL this is. It doesn't fill any needs that aren't currently met by either a mobile phone or a laptop.
If the base model came with 3G, and if it was available on Verizon, and if it had a camera, and it did multi-tasking – then, it might not be such a let down. I still would never buy one, ever, but at least it wouldn't be a total joke.
We own AAPL stock and we're going to short sell it because this fucker is going to tank.
Alex I think everyone that is disappointed is missing the boat. I have kind of swayed both ways in this, I was excited but I feel like I can wait till the 2.0 version. Think about how limited the iPhone was when it first launched… I believe that Apple is setting people up for the long sell.. it isn't necessarily a consumer device yet but I see this as a educational device.
I think that schools will add this into the cost of admission… I mean think about it the 3G model coming out in April which gives them a few months before the next fall semester for early adopters to “beta test”. I invision that next fall we see some universities almost giving these away at bookstores which then turns this device into a trojan horse.
My colleague (CADE) sent me the link to this article and the ensuing chat followed:
cade: http://thenextweb.com/apple/2010/01/28/call-ile…
http://www.news.com.au/technology/reviews/hands…
TFD: very interesting article though I'm not in the slightest surprised the market have been duped/ conned/ hoodwinked
cade: hm? how so?
TFD: ‘cause now people will have 2 devices
cade: nod
TFD: what they should have done is said: anyone with an iPhone gets a rebate on iPad or…switch completely and you get a discount ‘cause the headache is in the swapping or migrating from one to the other
cade: migrating is easy
TFD: no its not
cade: its all in iTunes
TFD: i'm talking about everything else
cade: ?
TFD: how you going to migrate all your images/ contacts/ etc/ telco etc the migration needs to be seamless
cade: hm? but it is
TFD: or its like….do I NEED the iPad?
cade: oh, most people don't yet.
TFD: what does it offer above and beyond my current technologies MAC/ iPhone etc etc exactly
so where's the cheese?
cade: the cheese is subtle.
TFD: more like I smell a rat
cade: it represents a theory
TFD: the device is a trick
cade: how so?
TFD: to entice people to pay for all their content that’s where its going
cade: that would be true if it's in a subscription model
TFD: have this…want this…..pay for it…NOW
sure
so they make it like an generic TELCO payment plan
get the device, pay $100 per month and blah blah blah……you're hooked
its Bull*hit
its a CON
cade: i don't get it.
TFD: they know they've got their custoTFDr base drooling…by the short and curly’s – news corp/ elec arts/ new york times/ disney etc etc they're all lining up to offer product exclusively THRU the iPad
cade: er that's wrong
TFD: no its not
cade: nothing is exclusive through the ipad
TFD: not yet!!!!!!
but they're moving that way
fur sure
cade: Amazon and Barns & Noble amongst others have deals with these people
TFD: so…new deals break old deals nothing will be exclusive at this tiTFD with B&N and Amazon I will reserve my consideration for a little while and we will review in say 3months but my guess is this:
the iPad is an iPhone tablet which will have new forms of content generators in the form of iTunes which users will use to pay for content the commoditisation of content is heading our way and the iPad is the 1st true test of what the TFDdia co's have been looking for
cade: except it's based on the assumption that people are actually going to pay which they really aren't
TFD: never say never and what makes you say people wont pay?
cade: because of the reality of free alternatives
TFD: i want cool device….therefore I will accept the terms and conditions of its use free alternatives are choking to death they are being overloaded with an enormous amount of junk people are turning back to programmed content programmed by people who know how to program it
cade: they really aren't though.
TFD: why do think there's an explosion in free-to-air TV
cade: The ABC / BBC / SBS / NPR / PBS America / etc
yes but the point is
Cable sales are down in most countries except for America
TFD: yeah exactly…..and they'll all consider a way to commoditize their content
cade: yeah, but what i'm saying is, i don't think people will pay for all of their content
TFD: the pendulum is swinging [no they wont] they will be enticed by a new media device which will bring them their content as they want it via selective bundled product delivery channels
TFD: 'they' (media organizations) are working on it they are going to join forces rather than compete for 'the space' the device will be the access point to payment for service/ content it may b another 3 years away it may be 12 months but it WILL get closer only a matter of time FREE content will always exist but the more media companies professionally 'package' their content, the more people will gravitate towards it anyway, I am certain about my argument
TFD: u there?
TFD: hey
cade: hiii!
i am here.
I’m musing.
i don't completely agree.
TFD: musing???
You don’t have to agree
I’m not trying to persuade you
I am adamant that the future will prove TFD right
It’s not new to TFD
cade: hmm
TFD: anything YOU or I create will always be FREE the difference is that the media companies have seen that the fight between them is fruitless and are devising new ways of commoditizing their stuff I think S. Jobs is in there with a particular business model and that parts of the puzzle like iTunes are the experiments
that justify the impending business model most business models begin with a get 2 for 1 or, 1st one free
etc
I know people like Tim Berners-Lee and Vinton Cerf etc devised it to be free
cade: mm
TFD: but now even they admit that 'there's gold in them thar hills' i.e. UK gov releasing content onto net in order to……get this (as quoted by TBLee himself) to generate new tax revenue from the use of the content. TBL is quoted as saying that by releasing the info people will find new ways in which to commoditize it
(My sincerest apologies for posting this twice)
My colleague (CADE) sent me the link to this article and the ensuing chat followed:
cade: http://thenextweb.com/apple/2010/01/28/call-ile…
http://www.news.com.au/technology/reviews/hands…
TFD: very interesting article though I'm not in the slightest surprised the market have been duped/ conned/ hoodwinked
cade: hm? how so?
TFD: ‘cause now people will have 2 devices
cade: nod
TFD: what they should have done is said: anyone with an iPhone gets a rebate on iPad or…switch completely and you get a discount ‘cause the headache is in the swapping or migrating from one to the other
cade: migrating is easy
TFD: no its not
cade: its all in iTunes
TFD: i'm talking about everything else
cade: ?
TFD: how you going to migrate all your images/ contacts/ etc/ telco etc the migration needs to be seamless
cade: hm? but it is
TFD: or its like….do I NEED the iPad?
cade: oh, most people don't yet.
TFD: what does it offer above and beyond my current technologies MAC/ iPhone etc etc exactly
so where's the cheese?
cade: the cheese is subtle.
TFD: more like I smell a rat
cade: it represents a theory
TFD: the device is a trick
cade: how so?
TFD: to entice people to pay for all their content that’s where its going
cade: that would be true if it's in a subscription model
TFD: have this…want this…..pay for it…NOW
sure
so they make it like an generic TELCO payment plan
get the device, pay $100 per month and blah blah blah……you're hooked
its Bull*hit
its a CON
cade: i don't get it.
TFD: they know they've got their customer base drooling…by the short and curly’s – news corp/ elec arts/ new york times/ disney etc etc they're all lining up to offer product exclusively THRU the iPad
cade: er that's wrong
TFD: no its not
cade: nothing is exclusive through the ipad
TFD: not yet!!!!!!
but they're moving that way
fur sure
cade: Amazon and Barns & Noble amongst others have deals with these people
TFD: so…new deals break old deals nothing will be exclusive at this time with B&N and Amazon I will reserve my consideration for a little while and we will review in say 3months but my guess is this:
the iPad is an iPhone tablet which will have new forms of content generators in the form of iTunes which users will use to pay for content the commoditisation of content is heading our way and the iPad is the 1st true test of what the media co's have been looking for
cade: except it's based on the assumption that people are actually going to pay which they really aren't
TFD: never say never and what makes you say people wont pay?
cade: because of the reality of free alternatives
TFD: i want cool device….therefore I will accept the terms and conditions of its use free alternatives are choking to death they are being overloaded with an enormous amount of junk people are turning back to programmed content programmed by people who know how to program it
cade: they really aren't though.
TFD: why do think there's an explosion in free-to-air TV
cade: The ABC / BBC / SBS / NPR / PBS America / etc
yes but the point is
Cable sales are down in most countries except for America
TFD: yeah exactly…..and they'll all consider a way to commoditize their content
cade: yeah, but what i'm saying is, i don't think people will pay for all of their content
TFD: the pendulum is swinging [no they wont] they will be enticed by a new media device which will bring them their content as they want it via selective bundled product delivery channels
TFD: 'they' (media organizations) are working on it they are going to join forces rather than compete for 'the space' the device will be the access point to payment for service/ content it may b another 3 years away it may be 12 months but it WILL get closer only a matter of time FREE content will always exist but the more media companies professionally 'package' their content, the more people will gravitate towards it anyway, I am certain about my argument
TFD: u there?
TFD: hey
cade: hiii!
i am here.
I’m musing.
i don't completely agree.
TFD: musing???
You don’t have to agree
I’m not trying to persuade you
I am adamant that the future will prove me right
It’s not new to me
cade: hmm
TFD: anything YOU or I create will always be FREE the difference is that the media companies have seen that the fight between them is fruitless and are devising new ways of commoditizing their stuff I think S. Jobs is in there with a particular business model and that parts of the puzzle like iTunes are the experiments
that justify the impending business model most business models begin with a get 2 for 1 or, 1st one free
etc
I know people like Tim Berners-Lee and Vinton Cerf etc devised it to be free
cade: mm
TFD: but now even they admit that 'there's gold in them thar hills' i.e. UK gov releasing content onto net in order to……get this (as quoted by TBLee himself) to generate new tax revenue from the use of the content. TBL is quoted as saying that by releasing the info people will find new ways in which to commoditize it
(My sincerest apologies for posting this twice)
My colleague (CADE) sent me the link to this article and the ensuing chat followed:
cade: http://thenextweb.com/apple/2010/01/28/call-ile…
http://www.news.com.au/technology/reviews/hands…
TFD: very interesting article though I'm not in the slightest surprised the market have been duped/ conned/ hoodwinked
cade: hm? how so?
TFD: ‘cause now people will have 2 devices
cade: nod
TFD: what they should have done is said: anyone with an iPhone gets a rebate on iPad or…switch completely and you get a discount ‘cause the headache is in the swapping or migrating from one to the other
cade: migrating is easy
TFD: no its not
cade: its all in iTunes
TFD: i'm talking about everything else
cade: ?
TFD: how you going to migrate all your images/ contacts/ etc/ telco etc the migration needs to be seamless
cade: hm? but it is
TFD: or its like….do I NEED the iPad?
cade: oh, most people don't yet.
TFD: what does it offer above and beyond my current technologies MAC/ iPhone etc etc exactly
so where's the cheese?
cade: the cheese is subtle.
TFD: more like I smell a rat
cade: it represents a theory
TFD: the device is a trick
cade: how so?
TFD: to entice people to pay for all their content that’s where its going
cade: that would be true if it's in a subscription model
TFD: have this…want this…..pay for it…NOW
sure
so they make it like an generic TELCO payment plan
get the device, pay $100 per month and blah blah blah……you're hooked
its Bull*hit
its a CON
cade: i don't get it.
TFD: they know they've got their customer base drooling…by the short and curly’s – news corp/ elec arts/ new york times/ disney etc etc they're all lining up to offer product exclusively THRU the iPad
cade: er that's wrong
TFD: no its not
cade: nothing is exclusive through the ipad
TFD: not yet!!!!!!
but they're moving that way
fur sure
cade: Amazon and Barns & Noble amongst others have deals with these people
TFD: so…new deals break old deals nothing will be exclusive at this time with B&N and Amazon I will reserve my consideration for a little while and we will review in say 3months but my guess is this:
the iPad is an iPhone tablet which will have new forms of content generators in the form of iTunes which users will use to pay for content the commoditisation of content is heading our way and the iPad is the 1st true test of what the media co's have been looking for
cade: except it's based on the assumption that people are actually going to pay which they really aren't
TFD: never say never and what makes you say people wont pay?
cade: because of the reality of free alternatives
TFD: i want cool device….therefore I will accept the terms and conditions of its use free alternatives are choking to death they are being overloaded with an enormous amount of junk people are turning back to programmed content programmed by people who know how to program it
cade: they really aren't though.
TFD: why do think there's an explosion in free-to-air TV
cade: The ABC / BBC / SBS / NPR / PBS America / etc
yes but the point is
Cable sales are down in most countries except for America
TFD: yeah exactly…..and they'll all consider a way to commoditize their content
cade: yeah, but what i'm saying is, i don't think people will pay for all of their content
TFD: the pendulum is swinging [no they wont] they will be enticed by a new media device which will bring them their content as they want it via selective bundled product delivery channels
TFD: 'they' (media organizations) are working on it they are going to join forces rather than compete for 'the space' the device will be the access point to payment for service/ content it may b another 3 years away it may be 12 months but it WILL get closer only a matter of time FREE content will always exist but the more media companies professionally 'package' their content, the more people will gravitate towards it anyway, I am certain about my argument
TFD: u there?
TFD: hey
cade: hiii!
i am here.
I’m musing.
i don't completely agree.
TFD: musing???
You don’t have to agree
I’m not trying to persuade you
I am adamant that the future will prove me right
It’s not new to me
cade: hmm
TFD: anything YOU or I create will always be FREE the difference is that the media companies have seen that the fight between them is fruitless and are devising new ways of commoditizing their stuff I think S. Jobs is in there with a particular business model and that parts of the puzzle like iTunes are the experiments
that justify the impending business model most business models begin with a get 2 for 1 or, 1st one free
etc
I know people like Tim Berners-Lee and Vinton Cerf etc devised it to be free
cade: mm
TFD: but now even they admit that 'there's gold in them thar hills' i.e. UK gov releasing content onto net in order to……get this (as quoted by TBLee himself) to generate new tax revenue from the use of the content. TBL is quoted as saying that by releasing the info people will find new ways in which to commoditize it
I tend to completely agree. Apple took an iPod Touch, stretched it out, and slapped a new name on it. Hardly a game changing device. My 4 year-old tablet pc doesn't have multi-touch, or the battery life, but it's a full fledged operating system. However, as an e-reader, this is a good size and weight for such a device, it would be quite ideal in this respect. It reminds me of the pads that were carried around in Star Trek TNG.
I want to acknowledge the large bezel, as I think I understand why Apple would have this. You have to hold this device somehow, and it's multi-touch. If you constantly have a thumb on the screen, it's a constant input, which shortens battery life or could disrupt an app. The bezel is a good place to place the thumb or fingers that are holding the device while being operated with the other hand.
No one has mentioned the claim of “viewing the Internet as it was meant to be.” The screen has a lackluster resolution of 1024×768, which is the minimum for the vast majority of websites today. However, I run across many sites that just look better with still larger resolutions, as the CSS encoding allows pages to “spread out.” I don't know about you, but I find working with many web apps, such as Google Docs or even Gmail, to be quite cramped at that resolution. On my Linux desktop, Firefox fills the width of the screen, a full 1280 pixels. I can understand Apple's claim here, as the resolution is more condusive to reading at 1024 due to the screen size, but I find the claim to be quite a bit exaggerated.
Finally, and while on the subject of web, I wish to also acknowledge the lack of Flash. The technology has been in the web for more than a decade. I remember being on a 38k modem waiting for a flash version of the 311 fan site to open to learn about the Transistor tour. This was 1997. Granted, Flash has grown since then, but I have to think that if my old Pentium with 16 MB of ram could handle Flash, the iPhone can. And for goodness sakes, so could the iPad.
Oh…and BTW…if Apple knows that this is the 'tipping point' between phone comms/ PC and TV/ Films/ Music etc then perhaps they should offer an iPhone Return program! Who else is going to recycle the zillions of iPhones already out there??? Just another incredible waste of material resources in a (supposed) resource conscious time. But then again perhaps Jobs is really appealing to the 'Me' Generation after all.
I agree with all your points + more. this sums it up nicely…
NO Flash Video (Apple & Adobe kiss and make up, this BS is just stupid.)
+ NO Multi-Tasking/Background Appz
+ No Camera
+ No USB ports
+ No SD card slot,
+ Horrible name
= None of my $$ being spent.
So did apple just have there first iFAIL for the new decade….. not a good sign
The iPAD isn't made for the Uber Geek… again I say Apple is playing the long bet here… The way this changes the game for so many industries with its pure simplicity.
It could change health care just by making it so that now a doctor can take his iPad off of the keyboard dock on his desk and carrying it over to a patient's room… to update the patients records which then updates the patients records via wifi instantly, he could then theoretically collaborate with another doctor across town in real time to diagnose a patient.
Or the insurance agent that can asses damage quickly and effectively right on this device.
I mentioned earlier about what education could use this for… heck in coming years we could see high school students having the option to download their school books on this device.
This device while lackluster fits a niche that hasn't exactly been defined yet. Its hard to be excited about it because its missing so many features we were looking for but the fact that you can use it to solve so many small issues that no body realized that they had before.
And honestly I think 16GB is reasonable for most peoples needs right now, but I expect to see a price drop to 350 400 within a year and even less in the future.
Sorry, but many of your comments are miles off mark. You criticize the “lack” of storage for your music as making it not-suitable for consumers in the 16GB format, and then reveal you base this on the fact that *your* library is over 45GB?
45GB libraries are not typical amongst consumers. The last research I saw pegged the average music collection at under 5GB. There's a reason that Apple's best-selling iPods are smaller ones.
Second, AT&T. The fact is that outside the tech geek frothosphere, no one sane was predicting a tablet capable of both GSM and CDMA. Two years after its initial intro, and three versions in, there is no CDMA iPhone. Did that not make you think that maybe, just maybe, introducing a model with CDMA (which is not a worldwide standard in Apple's key markets) was unlikely? Apple, by its actions with the iPhone, has made it very clear that GSM-only is what they are intrested in.
And using a chipset capable of GSM and CDMA would have add another $50 to the price. Which, given your complaints about the price, would have made you even less happy.
No Flash – come on, are you *really* surprised? Flash is the single-biggest crasher of Mac OS X, period. It's horribly processor intensive. The mobile version sucks. And, to be honest, if you seriously expected it to have Flash, you were either not living in the real world or forgetting who was making this product.
Multitasking – Yeah, I want it too. And I suspect we'll get it in the next OS update, which will be this year.
To sum up, Alex: You wanted a machine that was never going to happen, and now you are upset that you didn't get it. That'll teach you to take what websites who know nothing write.
I'll buy it off you. Seriously. If you're shorting Apple on the basis of the iPad, you're a fool.
A camera would be nice. But I don't need one when reading or watching movies. It feels good to have privacy. Multi-tasking superficially seems important, but can be a big distraction. I like to work on my iphone because I can focus on one things at a time.
The only thing that I wold probably care about is that it may be irritating not to have flash and I would have liked to see see a bit more innovation on the typing side. Thats easy to fix with an upgrade.
Why is there no stylus based handwriting/word recognition or at leasts some touch feedback for the keyboard feature irks me more but I understand it would require training. The reality is that these things take time to mature and the market needed a product now.
The iPad beats the Kindle and with 10 hours battery life it will be a valuable tool for me.
You missed the storage point. Consumers have increasing amounts of music, video, and image data. 16 gigabytes is not enough to handle that. It's a joke.
ATT is still a shit network that is currently overloaded. What is your point?
Flash crashes OS X?
Multitasking: I wanted a functional machine. They said no. How is that my fault?
Are you going to buy one?
I don't think that you are allowed to sell stock here mates, sorry! :0
Alex, I didn't miss the storage point – you did. You're claiming that consumers have, on average, more than 16GB iTunes libraries. You did this on the basis of a data point of… one. You. And you are not an average consumer, not by any means. You wouldn't, for example, buy an 8 or 16GB iPod nano – and yet the nano is Apple's most popular iPod.
Eighteen months ago, the average teenager had 1,700 tracks (http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/te…). That's enough to fit on a low-end iPod Nano. You and me, with our multi-tens of gigabytes of music, are edge cases.
AT&T may well be a shit network. In common with a lot of iPhone users, I don't use them – I live in the UK. In fact, according to AdMob stats from last June, at that point only 58% of iPhone users were in North America, and given the growth in sales and new countries coming on stream since then, the US is probably down below half of total iPhone users by now. Don't confuse your own local difficulties with something that will affect Apple's thinking.
You also didn't address my point: supporting CDMA would increase the cost of the iPad, either because they would have to support both standards in one chipset or manufacture two SKUs. Given that you've complained bitterly that it already costs too much, this seems contradictory to me.
Flash crashes Safari. Often. It is, in fact, the number one cause of Safari crashing. Apols for not making that clear. It is processor intensive and sucky on any platform, though.
Multitasking: As I said, I agree with you. I'm willing to wait, and in the meantime it's a trade off I'm prepared to make. If you think that its lack makes the machine “non-functional” that's your opinion, and that's fine.
Am I going to buy one? Yes. It fits the way I use the internet really, really well. I spend a good deal of time using my iPhone as the “second screen” in my living room, browsing, IMing, and emailing while I watch TV. The iPad does all that, but better, and also means I can get rid of the netbook I occasionally carry.
I think the real elephant in the room is this: A lot of people (including myself) were hoping for an actual tablet laptop, not a larger 3G-version of the iPod touch. I wanted a bonafide, OSX running, Intel processor-based tablet computer along the lines of the macbook air, not a larger 3G-version of the iPod touch. I don't care what anyone says, but it's not a cell-phone unless you can make an “actual” wireless call without some theoretical work around with Skype/VOIP. It's not a larger version of the iPhone, so stop buying into the marketing hype to hide the fact that Apple dropped the ball and let us all down.
People buy movies on iTunes. Those are large files. How many to fill the storage gap? 16 gigs is to small for a good number of people now, and an increasing percentage in coming years. 18 months ago 1700 tracks sure, but now that number is higher, and that data point only includes one thing, music. What about all the photos from your digital camera, etc?
The US is a pretty big market. Apple has yet to annouce any distro deals with global providers, so focusing on it seems fine by me. Also, if I am paying for ATT, it should be subsidized. It's the opposite, I pay more and then pay more. Odd, right?
Last point on you buying one, if you don't need flash or a good keyboard (from early hands on reporting), cool.
With the launch of the iPad tablet, Apple has managed to become the ultimate digital go-between company for high quality and high price content in a small yet very affluent segment of the population … NQ Logic encourages you to check out why Apple's iPad is the final digital puzzle for their ultimate connected consumer strategy at http://www.nqlogic.com
Fail
What’s the argument in favour of making and keeping it closed. I am afraid, the argument is twofold: (1) Jobs likes all machines to work as they are originally designed for, at the cost of limiting (and even killing) their ‘generativity’ (using J. Zittrain’s terminology), (2) commercial reasons: by keeping it closed, Apple can controlled the distribution of software and content, getting a good share of the benefits generated.
From: http://www.aribo.eu/2010/01/ipad-disrupting-tec…
Your obviously just biased against apple…..there is just as many if not more good things about the ipad than there is bad things…..you just chose to point out the bad things…..so stop acting like you know what your talking about….it may not suit you but it will suit about 20,000,000 other people …I'll bet you this is gonna be apples biggest product within 2 months of its existence.
Remember that when apple makes a product they are looking ahead…maybe handheld storage and devises like flash storage will no longer be needed if you can just stream your data to your fingertips. Give it time but wireless will be available everywhere and will be free(lets hope)…I agree that the next version of the ipad will have more bells and whistles but currently its a great introductory product that is trying to change the way we do things. Apple is all about a smooth running experience and Adobe has been unwilling to make their product more stable and offer it as is…I think they picked the wrong guy to snub….there is new technology around the corner that will take away from adobe flash like HTML 5…anyways be open to new things…I feel like this device or others to follow will make things easier for all of us…remember when we had to go to school and carry all those heavy books with black and white pages of text.
I agree with your opinion that iPad is really disappointed many with the amount of storage space it is offering. One an get similar configuration Netbook at almost same price and has much more features than iPad.