Comments on: Changing your domain is NOT good for blog ranking http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/ International technology news, business & culture Fri, 25 May 2012 08:18:22 +0200 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Crazy54 http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373353 Crazy54 Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:34:30 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373353 Our problem was that she took several hours to write a paper that was supposed to be written under exam conditions in one hour. , Our problem was that she took several hours to write a paper that was supposed to be written under exam conditions in one hour. ,

]]> By: jimmy s http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373351 jimmy s Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:23:32 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373351 i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to "ranking websites". Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world: http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It's a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on, and any blogger can lookup their website and see how they rank. i use the service ://URLFAN which to me is more transparent in regards to “ranking websites”. Their top 100 is pretty well respected in the web 2.0 world:

http://www.urlfan.com/site/top_100/100.html

urlfan ranks sites according to their popularity in the blogosphere and shows all their data. It’s a little more clear than both technorati and twingly when it comes to ranking websites, since thats what they focus on, and any blogger can lookup their website and see how they rank.

]]> By: Top 100, BlogRank und andere Twingly-renzien 2008 « Wha’ever! http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373350 Top 100, BlogRank und andere Twingly-renzien 2008 « Wha’ever! Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:41:11 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373350 [...] In die Top 100 kommen natürlich ausschliesslich spamfreie Einträge. Wie man sehen konnte hatten es sogar ein paar veraltete Blogs hineingeschafft, einfach weil deren Inlinks und Likes natürlich immer noch bei uns gezählt werden. Wir haben diese nun soweit entfernt. Natürlich sind dann Leute enttäuscht, wenn ihr neuer Blog eventuell nicht mehr bei uns dabei ist in der Top Liste (weil unter der neuen Domain noch nicht soviele Inlinks sind wie unter der alten) - aber das ändert sich ja mit der Zeit wieder und wir alle sind das Spiel von Google & Co. ja ein bißchen gewohnt. Hier ist ein schöner Beitrag dazu. [...] [...] In die Top 100 kommen natürlich ausschliesslich spamfreie Einträge. Wie man sehen konnte hatten es sogar ein paar veraltete Blogs hineingeschafft, einfach weil deren Inlinks und Likes natürlich immer noch bei uns gezählt werden. Wir haben diese nun soweit entfernt. Natürlich sind dann Leute enttäuscht, wenn ihr neuer Blog eventuell nicht mehr bei uns dabei ist in der Top Liste (weil unter der neuen Domain noch nicht soviele Inlinks sind wie unter der alten) – aber das ändert sich ja mit der Zeit wieder und wir alle sind das Spiel von Google & Co. ja ein bißchen gewohnt. Hier ist ein schöner Beitrag dazu. [...]

]]> By: Joop http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373349 Joop Thu, 18 Dec 2008 05:01:18 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373349 I love　the guys at Twingly, they are also frequent <a href="http://www.opencoffee.se" rel="nofollow">Opencoffee</a> visitors! I love　the guys at Twingly, they are also frequent Opencoffee visitors!

]]> By: Nicolas http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373348 Nicolas Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:40:21 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373348 And maybe there is a way to communicate with those blogs that still link to the .org domain ? And maybe there is a way to communicate with those blogs that still link to the .org domain ?

]]> By: Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373347 Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten Wed, 17 Dec 2008 13:32:37 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373347 Let us know when you fix that! We would be very happy... Let us know when you fix that! We would be very happy…

]]> By: Anton http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373346 Anton Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:49:33 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373346 Nice article, thanks! I know the fact that you've changed your domain (because this is one of my favorite blogs!) and that your profile is quite different than it should be. Kristoffer, one of our developers said "It would be nice to have a tool to change blog url or at least some mechanism for it" when he read this blog post. I say: do it! So hopefully it'll be something we can do in the future. Thanks again and keep up the good work you do with this blog! /Anton, Twingly.com Nice article, thanks! I know the fact that you’ve changed your domain (because this is one of my favorite blogs!) and that your profile is quite different than it should be.

Kristoffer, one of our developers said “It would be nice to have a tool to change blog url or at least some mechanism for it” when he read this blog post. I say: do it! So hopefully it’ll be something we can do in the future.

Thanks again and keep up the good work you do with this blog!

/Anton, Twingly.com

]]> By: babadr (Badr) http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/17/changing-your-domain-is-not-good-for-blog-ranking/#comment-373352 babadr (Badr) Wed, 17 Dec 2008 12:14:00 +0000 http://thenextweb.com/?p=8813#comment-373352 <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/gonzague">@gonzague</a> http://tinyurl.com/5vlle3 ton influence va en prendre un sacré coup :))) @gonzague http://tinyurl.com/5vlle3 ton influence va en prendre un sacré coup :)))

]]>