A new study confirms what you already suspect: Some people will believe anything if the right person shares it on Facebook.
The Media Insight study, funded by the American Press Institute and AP-NORC, interviewed a sample of 1,489 adults on AP-NORC’s survey panel in the period between November and December last year. Media Insight created a series of fake social media posts sharing two identical articles from different sources — one article being published by the Associated Press, and the other by a fake site called DailyNewsReview.
Blockchain and cryptocurrency news minus the bullshit.
Visit Hard Fork.
The participants were shown a mock-up social media post that showed the story being shared by a source, which could be anyone from Oprah to the US Surgeon General. About half of the participants were assigned a sharer they said earlier they would trust, while the other half weren’t.
50 percent of participants said they trusted the story’s facts if it was shared by someone they trusted, while only 34 percent said so if the story was shared by anyone else. Across the board, the people surveyed were more likely to trust the story, find it entertaining, and believe it to be well-reported if it was shared by a trusted person.
Also, about half of the participants could remember who shared the article when asked later, while only two in 10 could identify the source.
This might explain why fake news outpaced real news last year, and makes Facebook’s efforts to fix the problem a little more important. Without realizing it, we may be relying a little too much on sharers for accurate news stories.