Many in the Bitcoin community told me that, in deference to the Bitcoin creator’s clear desire for privacy, they didn’t want to see the wizard unmasked. But even among those who said this, few could resist debating the clues the founder left behind. As I had these conversations with the programmers and entrepreneurs who are most deeply involved in Bitcoin, I encountered a quiet but widely held belief that much of the most convincing evidence pointed to a reclusive American man of Hungarian descent named Nick Szabo.
Throughout the lengthy article Szabo is presented as being uncomfortable with the attention and explicitly denying that he is the man behind the crypto-currency.
Newsweek pinned Bitcoin on an entirely different man in a cover story last year, which was widely criticized and whose subject has talked about suing the publication.
In his piece, Popper actually recounts how uncomfortable Szabo was when he confronted him in person with the idea that he may, in fact, be Satoshi.
This is clear instance of where journalism needs to differentiate between ‘public interest’ and ‘things that interest the public’. We may be curious about who really created Bitcoin, but we’ve no right to know.
Image credit: Shutterstock