The heart of tech is coming to the heart of the Mediterranean. Join TNW in València this March 🇪🇸

This article was published on January 24, 2012

Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales: MPAA CEO Christopher Dodd should be fired

Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales: MPAA CEO Christopher Dodd should be fired
Matt Brian
Story by

Matt Brian

Matt is the former News Editor for The Next Web. You can follow him on Twitter, subscribe to his updates on Facebook and catch up with him Matt is the former News Editor for The Next Web. You can follow him on Twitter, subscribe to his updates on Facebook and catch up with him on Google+.

Speaking about Wikipedia’s blackout and further support to abolish the controversial SOPA and PIPA bills, Jimmy Wales went on record at the DLD Conference in Munich to call out Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) chief executive Christopher Dodd, saying that he should be fired by the organisation that he represents.

Asking specifically for the media to quote him, Wales referred to comments made by Dodd that accused Wikipedia’s blackout as “an abuse of power,” noting that 10 million voters contacted Congress to voice their complaints. “That is not an abuse of power,” Wales said, “that’s democracy…and he better get used to it.”

Wales also referenced Dodd’s interview with Fox News where he said that politicians who failed to back anti-piracy legislation could see Hollywood withdraw their funding.

The Wikipedia founder said:

If you are a member organisation of the MPAA and this is your public representative who’s making you look like a corrupt, Congress-buying organisation in front of the general public, you are not being an effective lobbyist and you are not solving the problems that the MPAA hired you to solve.

With the SOPA bill currently on ice, Wales said that there was now the opportunity to bring together the Hollywood studios and let them “come to the table and talk with Silicon Valley with a little bit more humility.”

Recognising that whilst the majority of ant-SOPA campaigners are against piracy, Wales says that the “other side” is getting away with making claims that companies like Google are pirates because they serve links to copyrighted content, ensuring that a comprehensive discussion cannot be had about the issues.

If there are serious criminal organisations engaging in large-scale piracy, then let’s start to deal with that. But let’s deal with that in ways that don’t involve censoring the Internet, that don’t involve ridiculous technologically incompentent ideas. Let’s have a serious conversation about what we can do about some of these problems.

I think we have that opportunity now, and I think we should take it.

At the beginning on the panel, Pavel Durov — creator of Russian social network Vkontakte — pledged his support to Wikipedia, noting how it works to help educate people and how it’s not fair that the site has to solicit contributions over a number of months.

Durov announced live on stage that he would personally donate $1 million dollars to the online encyclopaedia, marking one of the largest contributions the website has received since it launched.

Last year, we interviewed Wales at an Internet Week Europe event in London, where the Wikipedia founder talked about the donations process on the website. Google holds the record for the highest contribution, donating $2 million, with a number of other investors making $500,000 pledges.

Wales says he is sympathetic to companies that spend $100 million dollars making a movie, only for it to leak on the Internet before it launched, but highlights the problems with being able to view content he has already bought on different mediums that just isn’t available where he lives.

Wales concluded his talk with the following thought:

“It is easy for us on our side to say [the MPAA] was against the VCR, cassette tapes and have been against these things and made lots of money, so now you are against the Internet and we are just going to ignore you because you were wrong before.

That is a tempting approach but we also have to say they do face real serious problems. If we don’t listen to their real problems, they won’t listen to our real problems. There are solutions here that aren’t all that complicated.

Also tagged with