Want to keep the TNW Conference vibe going?? Tickets for TNW2022 are available now >>

Inside money, markets, and Big Tech

This article was published on August 21, 2019

SEC unsurprisingly slaps Russian firm with $270K fine for misleading ICO promotions

Well, nice try

SEC unsurprisingly slaps Russian firm with $270K fine for misleading ICO promotions
Matthew Beedham
Story by

Matthew Beedham

Editor, SHIFT by TNW

Matthew is the editor of SHIFT. He likes electric cars, and other things with wheels, wings, or hulls. Matthew is the editor of SHIFT. He likes electric cars, and other things with wheels, wings, or hulls.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has settled a fine with a Russian firm that was pushing initial coin offerings (ICOs) without disclosing the fact that it had accepted payment to do so.

Late yesterday, the SEC announced it has reached a $268,998 settlement with ICO Rating. According to the SEC, ICO Rating promoted cryptocurrency projects between December 2017 and July 2018 – the infamous boom period – that should have been classified as securities.

As a result, ICO Rating should have disclosed the fact that it accepted payment to promote some coins and tokens.

ICO Rating positions itself as “a rating agency that issues independent analytical research.” Perhaps ironically now in hindsight, the website also says its mission is “to help the market achieve the necessary standards of quality, transparency and reliability.”

It seems the company itself can’t even meet basic standards of transparency with this latest news.

ICO Rating has neither admitted nor denied the SEC‘s claims. However, it has agreed cease and desist from committing any future violations of the same nature. It also agreed to repay its ill-gotten gains and prejudgment interest totaling $106,998, and a civil penalty of $162,000.

Indeed, this news is hardly surprising. An investigation by Breaker last year, found that half of the crypto-media outlets they contacted would accept money to publish information about ICOs as if it were independent editorial content.

Also tagged with