This article was published on November 11, 2010

Samsung Galaxy Tab Reviews Are Out: iPad Watch Your Back

Samsung Galaxy Tab Reviews Are Out: iPad Watch Your Back
Adam Mills
Story by

Adam Mills

Adam is a technology blogger based in San Francisco, California who loves his iPhone 3GS and Motorola Droid 2 equally. You can follow him on Adam is a technology blogger based in San Francisco, California who loves his iPhone 3GS and Motorola Droid 2 equally. You can follow him on Twitter or reach him by email at [email protected]

It has been a long time coming but Samsung’s Android 2.2 powered Galaxy Tab has finally arrived. Today, it launched on T-Mobile and over the course of the week, it will be hitting two more carriers in Sprint and Verizon. AT&T’s version has no pricing or release date as of yet but it should be out in time for the holiday season.

While Verizon will be releasing it off contract for $599, T-Mobile and Sprint will be selling it for $399 with on two year contracts. In comparison, Apple’s iPad starts at $499 for the Wi-Fi only model. Beyond pricing though how does the Galaxy stack up next to the iPad?

Cue Walt Mossberg from the Wall Street Journal and David Pogue of the New York Times who both just released their reviews of the Galaxy Tab. Mossberg exclaims from the outset that the Samsung Galaxy Tab is indeed the iPad’s first real challenger in the tablet market for a number of reasons. And guess what?

Pogue’s thoughts are nearly identical.

Mossberg on the some of the differences between the iPad and Galaxy Tab:

It includes the three most-requested features missing in the iPad: a camera (two in fact); the ability to run Web videos and applications written in Adobe’s Flash software; and multitasking, though, to be fair, the latter feature is coming to the iPad imminently via a software update. Another strong point is that like Apple, Samsung has rewritten some of the standard apps, such as the email and calendar programs, to make them look more like PC programs and less like smartphone apps.

Pogue touches on some as well:

But the Galaxy doesn’t feel like a cramped iPad. It feels like an extra-spacious Android phone. And the payoff is huge. The Galaxy is much lighter than the iPad (13 ounces vs. 1.5 pounds), which makes a huge difference when you have to hold it to watch a movie on the plane. And it’s so small you can carry it in a blazer pocket.


There are front- and rear-facing cameras, too — take that, iPad! — with a flash, video, exposure controls and special effects. It’s a little weird to hold up this enormous slate in front of you when you want to take a picture. But it’s also awesome; when have you ever used a camera with a 7-inch screen?

How about the software? There has been some speculation as to whether or not Android 2.2 would be good on a tablet device, especially after Google themselves stated that the software wasn’t optimal for tablet devices.

On Android, Mossberg states:

The Tab uses the latest version of Android, and it generally worked very smoothly, even though Google has warned that Android isn’t yet ready for tablets. I was especially impressed with Samsung’s attractive and usable rewrites of the calendar, email and contacts apps, which, like their iPad cousins, use multiple panels to make them more computer-like, while still remaining touch-friendly.

Pogue’s thoughts?

In any case, the Galaxy offers all of Android’s traditional high points, including many features you can’t get on the iPad. For example, you can customize its nine home screens by placing icons or mini info windows anywhere you like (they don’t have to sit in an organized grid). You can dictate text instead of typing it, or search Google or Google Maps by voice.

In summary, both reviewers close it out by saying that the Galaxy Tab is very much going to be in competition with the iPad. Pogue probably sums it up best when he states:

So yes, the dawn of the would-be iPad is upon us. But the Android tablet concept represents more than just a lame effort to grab a slice of tablet hype. As with Android phones, it represents an alternative that’s different enough to justify its existence. You’re buying into a different approach to size, built-in goodies like cameras and GPS, and the more freewheeling Android app store.

The tablet wars have officially begun, folks and you can expect a complete TNW review of the Galaxy Tab in the coming days.

Update: Gizmodo also released a review earlier today and needless to say, they had a much different take than Mossberg and Pogue. Here are a few choice clips from Matt Buchanan:

On iPad similarities:

In the places where Samsung tries to make the Tab feel more like a tablet than a big phone, it’s not afraid to borrow liberally from what Apple’s done on the iPad. The music app (a huge improvement over the standard Android player) bears an uncanny resemblance to the iPad’s iPod app, while the faux-realness of the Calendar, Contacts and Memo apps feel like Chinatown knockoffs of Cupertino software.

He goes on to describe the Galaxy Tab like this:

This thing is just a mess. It’s like a tablet drunkenly hooked up with a phone, and then took the fetus swimming in a Superfund cleanup site.

Buchanan did like one thing though, the screen:

Screen is pretty killer. The pixel density—1024×600 pixels packed into a 7-inch display—makes everything from reading to watching video seriously pleasant. (Put another way: Reading Kindle books feels better than on the iPad.)

So there you have it, the first device to ever be compared how a fetus would look after swimming in a Superfund cleanup site.

Get the TNW newsletter

Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.

Also tagged with

Back to top