The heart of tech is coming to the heart of the Mediterranean. Join TNW in València this March 🇪🇸

This article was published on February 14, 2019

EU’s final Copyright Reform upholds disastrous upload filters

EU’s final Copyright Reform upholds disastrous upload filters
Már Másson Maack
Story by

Már Másson Maack

Editor, Growth Quarters by TNW

Már tries to juggle his editorial duties with writing the occasional weird article. He also loves talking about himself in the third person. Már tries to juggle his editorial duties with writing the occasional weird article. He also loves talking about himself in the third person.

EU’s controversial Copyright Reform is only couple of months from becoming official EU law after the European Parliament and the Council agreed on the final text last night. Opponents of the finalized version are putting their hopes on a final vote in Parliament in March or April to repeal the contested Articles 11 and 13.

Article 13 has especially worried opponents as it’ll make platforms liable for any copyright infringement by its users — essentially forcing them to create ‘upload filters.’

The upload filters, which have also been dubbed censorship machines by its opponents, aren’t specifically mentioned in the reform, but commercial sites and apps which allow users to post content are obligated to make their “best efforts” to preemptively buy licenses that users may upload.

Or as MEP Julia Reda — who’s fought the current version of the Copyright Reform — put it in her blog post, “that is: all copyrighted content in the world. An impossible feat.”

Reda adds in her article that if a court should ever find a platform’s licensing or filtering efforts not adequate, it would be directly liable for users’ copyright infringements as if the platform itself had committed them. “This massive threat will lead platforms to over-comply with these rules to stay on the safe side, further worsening the impact on our freedom of speech,” Reda wrote.

The European Parliament states the directive will not “impose filters” but doesn’t clearly state how platforms are meant to comply and prevent infringements by users. The Parliament also reiterates the updated Copyright Reform is aimed at ensuring internet platforms are incentivized “to pay for artists and journalists’ work used.”

Most people agree with the directive’s sentiment, but the debate is over whether Articles 11 and 13 will actually have the stated effect, or have unintended and disastrous consequences.

The final text of Article 11 — which has been the other major bone of contention — also ended up being pretty much what opponents had feared, limiting the ability for any service to show snippets with links.

Google, which admittedly has skin in the game, said recently that traffic to news sites dropped 45 percent in its experiments with reduced snippets — which still showed publication title, URL, and video thumbnails.

Parliament says Article 11 will allow hyperlinks to news articles to be accompanied by “individual words or very short extracts” without payments to rightsholders.

“The ‘snippet’ can therefore continue to appear in a Google News newsfeeds, for example, or when an article is shared on Facebook, provided it is ‘very short,'” the Parliament’s statement reads.

However, Reda questions what constitutes as “very short” and points out that similar legislation already failed in Germany.

The final text of the Copyright Reform will now have to be approved by the Legal Affairs Committee, then voted on by member state governments in the European Council — but it’ll likely be passed there.

That’s why Reda and other opponents believe the best is a final vote in Parliament, where all 751 MEPs who represent EU citizens will weigh in. It’ll likely take place at the end of March or first half of April and Reda believes it’ll be possible to get a majority against the controversial proposal.

If you’re an EU citizen and care about this issue, you can reach out to your representatives in Parliament and make your voice heard.

Also tagged with

Back to top