Anthony Albanese has told the AI industry that Australian books, music, and journalism are not free training data, and that any large data centre built in the country will have to put more electricity into the grid than it draws out. Neither of those things is law yet.
The prime minister used a speech at the University of Sydney on Wednesday to announce an Office of AI inside his own department, effective immediately, plus Australian Standards covering energy, water, copyright, and siting.
It lands two days after Anthropic and others were reported to be weighing tens of billions in data centre investment against a copyright carve-out Canberra had already ruled out.
The energy obligation is the sharpest thing in the speech. Operators of the next generation of large data centres would be required to underwrite new power supply, pay their full share of grid connection so that no costs land on homes or businesses, and put at least as much energy into the grid as they take out of it.
“To be net-generators, not net-users,” Albanese said. That means funding new renewable generation and firming rather than joining a queue for someone else’s electrons, a heavier ask than anything hyperscalers face in Europe or the US, where grids are already buckling under connection requests.
The 💜 of EU tech
The latest rumblings from the EU tech scene, a story from our wise ol' founder Boris, and some questionable AI art. It's free, every week, in your inbox. Sign up now!
Water got similar treatment. Operators would have to minimise water use, maximise energy efficiency, and pay for any additional water infrastructure they need, on a continent Albanese called both the sunniest and the driest on earth.
Copyright got the rhetoric. “Let me make this crystal clear: not everything produced in Australia is up for grabs,” he said. “Not at all.” Australian writers, musicians, artists, and journalists “must retain ownership and control of their work”, and no company should train on it without the artist’s control of its price and value. “Anything less, is theft.”
What the speech did not contain was a mechanism. The policy has been read as obliging AI firms to reach agreements with local artists and media before using their content, but Albanese never said how that control would be enforced, and the attorney-general’s consultation on copyright is still open.
The distance between announced and legislated is the story here. Nothing unveiled on Wednesday binds anyone: the Office of AI is an executive creation, the standards go to National Cabinet next month, and legislation is only targeted for introduction early next year.
Albanese was candid that he does not want an exhaustive rulebook. “It is not our goal to try and legislate for every possible eventuality or risk,” he said. That is a lighter touch than the language around it implies, and closer to the ground Brussels has been retreating to than to the AI Act as drafted.
His claim that Australia “will be the first country in the world to bring these issues into a single, national framework” is doing work it cannot carry. The EU adopted the AI Act in 2024 and built an AI Office to run it, as legal scholars noted within hours.
Reaction divided on schedule. Greenpeace Australia’s Joe Rafalowicz called the facilities “water-guzzling energy vampires”, accusing the government of rolling out the red carpet while leaving them unregulated until at least 2027. Opposition Leader Angus Taylor said the office would just create more bureaucracy.
New York, hours before Albanese spoke, halted large data centre builds for a year, the pause Australia has now declined to take. Washington is still arguing over who pays when data centres raise power bills, the question Albanese thinks he has answered in advance.
Anthropic, which told Treasurer Jim Chalmers that its A$21.6bn Australian investment depended on copyright certainty, said it respected the process and would meet the terms the government sets. That is a company waiting for the fine print.
APRA AMCOS chief executive Dean Ormston welcomed the certainty but said the Office of AI “must seriously interrogate the numbers AI platforms are putting on the table”. The numbers are not on the table yet. Neither is the bill.
Get the TNW newsletter
Get the most important tech news in your inbox each week.