This article was originally published on .cult by Hélène Le Gascoin, Hayley Kuhl, and Emma Tracey. .cult is a Berlin-based community platform for developers. We write about all things career-related, make original documentaries and share heaps of other untold developer stories from around the world.
The average developer rates their happiness at 61 out of a potential 100 points, compared to the average OECD citizen who rates their happiness at 65. Hard to say if the comparison is fair, given the different data sets, but it suggests developers are not yet prioritizing their happiness.
Of course, there are huge variations in how developers evaluate their happiness depending on where they are located. Globally, Northern and Western European countries rank as the countries with the happiest developers.
When looking at average developer happiness per country, Nordic countries dominate the rankings: Denmark, Norway, Finland , and Sweden all take a place in the top ten. Canada ranks joint 8th with Germany and is the only non-European among the top.
Given the limitations of our sample, we compared the findings to the World Happiness Report 2020 (WHR). Our results are fairly consistent with the report — seven of the top 10 countries are shared across both sets of data. Germany, Canada, and France, which rank 8th, 9th, and 10th in our results, appear 17th, 11th, and 23rd respectively on the World Happiness Report. The dominance of the Nordics in both reports is a striking similarity.
The World Happiness Report attributes the Nordic populations’ happiness to “the quality of institutions, such as reliable and extensive welfare benefits, low corruption, and well-functioning democracy and state institutions.” Indeed, sustained happiness is connected to a high perceived level of stability and democracy.
Relationships and personal autonomy are also important factors moderating happiness. According to the WHR “Nordic citizens experience a high sense of autonomy and freedom, as well as high levels of social trust towards each other, which play an important role in determining life satisfaction.”
The Netherlands, the country which takes the third spot on our rankings, tops OECD countries for high life satisfaction among young people. The education system focuses on developing autonomy and self-determination rather than obedience, resulting in happier people and better outcomes.
Stability and well-functioning institutions combined with personal freedom, safety, and autonomy seem to be the recipe that determines happiness in the countries that top both our index and the WHR.
We asked developers to evaluate 20 indicators across four categories by importance and then by satisfaction to derive self-evaluated happiness. Career indicators ranked highly in importance. Three of the top five indicators of happiness are related to developers’ careers — work life balance, learning opportunities, and work environment. It should be noted, however, that while the same scales were used, we did not explicitly ask developers to compare indicators across categories.
The importance of work to happiness is not just true for developers. In fact, one of the most robust findings in the study of happiness is that unemployment is destructive to people’s wellbeing. This is true across age, gender and country.
According to Harvard Business Review, employed people are happier and have less negative emotional experiences in their day to day lives. Further, non-monetary aspects of employment, such as social status, social relations, daily structure and goal achievement, are key drivers of well-being.
Since we spend a lot of our lives working, it is inevitable that work plays a key role in shaping our levels of happiness. From our analysis, we found that for developers, happy jobs are remarkably similar to happy countries: stable leadership, autonomy , and a sense of self-determination and achievement.
Healthcare and safety also ranked very highly as indicators of happiness amongst developers. Health and happiness are self-reinforcing, happier people tend to be healthier.
Across segments, developer happiness remained fairly constant, be it by age, gender or coding experience. As developers get older and gain more experience, they grow slightly less happy. Female developers are slightly more happy than male developers, though again there is only a small difference between these two groups.
Deep Dive: Career
- Work-life balance is the most important predictor of developer career happiness.
- Developers in Northern Europe are most satisfied with their work-life balance — they also work the shortest hours.
- Satisfaction with work-life balance increases in trusting environments, where developers feel they have flexibility in their schedules.
- Older developers are less satisfied with working environments and company culture and begin to face ageism from the age of 29.
- Women are more satisfied than men with their salaries, though a large gender pay gap exists. The pay gap is largest in North and South America.
- The happiest developers at work live in the Scandinavian countries of Northern Europe. The unhappiest at work are based in Southern Europe.
- Companies with high employee happiness outperform their peers.
Work-Life Balance: The Most Important Factor for Developer Happiness at Work
We all want to live rich and meaningful lives — at work and home — without sacrificing important aspects of either. When the balance is skewed, it can affect one’s physical and mental well-being, and that’s when things start to fall apart both inside and outside of work.
Work-life balance is the most important indicator for developer happiness at work, regardless of experience, age, gender, position, and region. 75% of developers cited this factor as “very important,” and 39% consider themselves “very satisfied”.
Satisfaction with work-life balance can vary quite dramatically depending on which region of the world you are working in as a developer. The geographical variance may give some hints to international companies about which factors matter when considering long term policies to increase satisfaction with work-life balance.
More than half of developers located in the Scandinavian and Nordic countries of Northern Europe are very satisfied with their work-life balance, higher than anywhere else in the world.They also enjoy shorter working hours on average than developers in all other regions (when measured by % working a 40 – 60 hour week).
The positive results from Scandinavia’s six-hour workdays or four-day-weeks aren’t isolated to Europe; practices like these have been trialed in Chinese call centers and Microsoft offices in Japan with similar indications of increased productivity.
Scandinavia’s success in promoting work-life balance is powered by the high amount of trust between people, a culture of collaboration, and preference for consensus-based decisions, which leads to greater feelings of autonomy.
Developers located in North America are the second-most satisfied with their work-life balance despite working the longest hours of any region on average.
In the United States, large tech companies like Amazon, IBM, and others, employ the greatest number of developers countrywide and are at the forefront of progressive work cultures. These companies are renowned for implementing policies similar to Scandinavia, such as parental leave, health insurance, and dental plans.
Countries in Southern Europe work longer hours over longer workdays and have lower salaries compared to countries in Western and Northern Europe. In 2016, Spain’s employment minister called for companies to allow their employees to finish their workday at 6 p.m. rather than the long-held 8 p.m., which was no longer punctuated by long breaks.
In our results, developers talk about how work-life balance can negatively impact their happiness and mental health. Some developers complain that “unpaid overtime is expected from you as a developer these days” and that the lack of work-life balance “leads to the prevalence of mental disorders and burnout across the industry.”
Remote work is often cited as a means to improve work-life balance. In our open comments section, remote work is mentioned nearly 200 times, particularly as a solution for noisy open offices and long commute times. COVID-19 has pushed many teams into remote situations and over time we will see if this does indeed impact happiness.
There’s often the temptation to make quick changes to improve work-life balance, but companies need to commit time and effort for policies to be successful. A 2019 Harvard Business Review article summarised the traps of implementing policies that are not well thought through:
- Flexibility does not always translate into a better work-life balance. Since employees can communicate with colleagues through their devices at any time, remote workers often experience high work-intensity and reduced autonomy. This constant connectivity can blur the boundaries between work and non-work activities.
- Paid family leave or childcare support can raise perceptions of unfairness in the workforce. Such policies are typically reserved for workers with caregiving responsibilities. They are much less accessible to workers who desire the same level of work-life balance but lack urgent family responsibilities.
- The majority of employees who do have access to flexible work arrangements are reluctant to use them. Many fear that doing so shows low work-commitment and will harm their career.
To maintain happy developers, it is essential to not only promote a healthy work-life balance but to live it. Employers need to train supervisors to be positive role models and offer practical and emotional support in topics related to work-life balance.
Female developers place higher importance on work-life balance than male developers. 81% of women say work-life balance is very important for career happiness, compared to 75% of men.
Organizations that create positive work-life policies and train managers to implement them enjoy greater success in improving happiness, engagement, and productivity.
Environment and Culture: The more senior the developer, the less satisfied they are with their work environments and company culture.
Jump into any Reddit or Quora thread and you will find plenty of vocal developers sharing their gripes with their work environments and company cultures. After all, 60% of them consider company culture to be very important, while only 25% are very satisfied, and the level of satisfaction decreases as the developer gains more experience.
Levels of satisfaction with work environment and company culture diminish as developers gain more experience (20+ years of experience is the only exception).
This is suggestive of a broader trend of age discrimination in the tech industry. According to research from CWjobs, the average age that tech professionals begin experiencing ageism (in the United Kingdom) is at 29 years old, compared to 41 years old on average across industries.
Company culture in tech companies is not typically formed with more experienced developers in mind. Companies want to build a “fun” culture, which can be isolating for some.
Creating a healthy work environment and company culture, which is relevant to all age groups, is an essential investment in any business. It reduces employee turnover, improves productivity and motivation, and naturally contributes to an overall sense of well-being and happiness among employees.
But how do you go about creating an environment and culture within which developers can thrive? In their words, it’s pretty simple: trust them, appreciate them and listen to them – and abandon the open-office structure, too.
In our survey, we posed the following question: What else, if anything, contributes to your overall happiness as a developer? From the 2000+ responses, most centered around relationships with teammates and management, recognition and appreciation, autonomy, meaningful work, and the general office environment.
Given the collaborative nature of software development, it’s no surprise that developers care most about the team they’re on. In Gallup’s research, social capital, as measured through the support one receives from fellow workers, is positively correlated to happiness at work.
Developers say they want to be part of “passionate,” “diverse,” “cooperative,” and “supportive” teams. They expect responsibility to be shared, team members, to be open to knowledge-sharing, and product colleagues to be process-driven and focused.
Engineering’s relationship with Product can fuel productive, creative solutions or developers can see it as a major obstacle in building stable and valuable products. Collective responsibility and high trust – not just amongst engineers, but among the broader team – is desired by many:
“I value respect among co-workers and owning up to failure as a team rather than pointing towards a specific person or department. For example, not blaming just the QA team for a site-breaking bug making its way to production since multiple failures by multiple parties need to occur for this to happen.”
Among engineering teams, respondents crave mentorship and want to create open cultures of sharing:
Fostering knowledge sharing needs a strong base of trust and friendship among people. Allow your team time and space to become friends and instill that into the culture:
“Working with developers of varying experience has taught me a lot. It doesn’t matter if someone has been at it for two months or 20 years, they may have something to teach me and I may have something to teach them. Contributions to solutions are great when shared with other people.”
Management plays a significant role in developer happiness at work. Developers want managers who respect clean code practices and value coding as a creative process:
“As a developer, I want to write clean code and I want managers that understand the importance of clean code. I don’t want to work with people who force me to deploy untested code because “we need this feature working today.”
Many mention a desire to work for leaders who are committed to a bigger vision, who care, and who set a clear direction:
“A clear direction/target (ideally one that you believe in) for your product, confidence and pride in your product, and a sense of security (in terms of your company’s sustainability and the confidence you have in the company’s leadership) are the most important factors in my opinion, regardless of your position within the company hierarchy.”
The impact of management should not be overlooked. Developers state that they would “rather work for a good manager but use a bad tech stack” than vice versa; “poor management can make people change jobs or give up altogether,” and “the pay is decent, the tech stack is lacking, but my manager does not inspire or promote progress, so I am leaving.”
In a recent Glassdoor survey, 53% of people said feeling more appreciation from their boss would help them stay longer at their company, and developers feel the same:
Recognition is about giving positive feedback based on results or performance. It can come formally: an award, a promotion, a raise, or informally: a verbal thank you, a handwritten note, requesting advice. In both forms, recognition boosts morale, productivity, and happiness – everyone wants to be recognized for the good work they do.
“I get a boost to my esteem from internal and external recognition and appreciation. It’s important how the company values my input, effort, advice and vision.”
There is a difference, however, between recognition and appreciation. Recognition is conditional, finite and in the past – we are praised for specific work we have accomplished. On the other hand, appreciation is about acknowledging one’s inherent value – not what a person has done, but who they are.
Showing appreciation for and recognition of your employees doesn’t take a lot of time. Actively going out of your way to thank someone for their work, or asking them how they’re really doing could be the difference between retaining or losing a great developer.
Autonomy and Trust
In an LSE analysis of 51 experimental studies of financial incentives, researchers found overwhelming evidence that these incentives may actually reduce an employee’s natural desire to complete a task and derive pleasure from doing so.
Counterintuitive, right? Not for Dan Pink and others, who for years have promoted intrinsic motivators – like autonomy – over extrinsic motivators, especially for people working on complex and creative tasks.
And autonomy is connected not just to happiness, but also to motivation. The Self-Determination Theory shows that motivation exists on a spectrum that is largely moderated by autonomy and that higher degrees of motivation can only exist in an autonomous state.
Autonomy is the need to direct one’s own life and work. Coding requires finding creative solutions to complex problems and the autonomy requested by developers (more interactions with users, stronger influence in technical decision making, a sharper focus on quality, time for strategic thinking) could result in creating better products:
“We need to involve developers in the process of making decisions about tools, frameworks, best practices, and business requirements. We need to adopt software craftsmanship rules and collective code ownership on a bigger scale. Unit tests, SOLID, code quality should not be questioned.”
“I want some sort of feeling of personal ownership of what I am working on. In larger companies and bigger projects a lot of time things are just taken out of your hand and all decisions are being made somewhere else. This is very demoralising over time because I lose agency and it is hard to find that feeling of accomplishment which is important to me.”
“I want some sort of feeling of personal ownership of what I am working on. In larger companies and bigger projects a lot of time things are just taken out of your hand and all decisions are being made somewhere else. This is very demoralising over time because I lose agency and it is hard to find that feeling of accomplishment which is important to me.”
“Autonomy and the ability to be more than a code monkey. It is very important to be able to have input into a project and not just be treated like a machine that spits out code. Developers are creative problem solvers.”
“Being given fun and substantial dev tasks that might take some time to think about and architect intelligently rather than microtasks that need to be completed quickly and without any strategic thought.”
Developers generally tend to be a well-intentioned bunch. Open source, for example, aspires to make knowledge free and widely available for all. Volunteer-run programs that help people learn to code exist in most major cities. And when it comes to day-to-day work, developers know purpose and meaning is important.
This fits with Dan Pink’s already citedAutonomy-Mastery-Purpose model, where the purpose is the need to work towards something meaningful and bigger than oneself.
Many developers expressed pride in “building the future” and a desire to avoid companies that “contribute negatively to social well-being.” And while some did express the desire to know their work was contributing to grand “social change”, many simply want to feel useful and understand their company’s role and their own place:
“It’s important to have the feeling that you’re contributing to something that matters, not just being paid to make somebody else even richer.”
“It’s important that I feel my work is benefiting people instead of businesses, and that it is solving meaningful problems as opposed to developing artificial digitalisation bullshit.”
“Sometimes we have the best tech stack, the best team, but we still feel that we are not contributing to society, and this generates a space to fill. I want the feeling of being useful.”
The final piece of the puzzle to create a happy work environment and culture for developers is the office environment. According to Stack Overflow data,almost 42% of developers state that a distracting work environment is their biggest barrier to productivity, followed closely by meetings and being tasked with non-development work.
Comments from our survey respondents cite similar struggles; developers complain of “sharing an open office with louder departments” and that “employers should focus more on the physical and mental well-being of developers.”
Developers also expressed gratitude for companies that allowed them to choose their own equipment, not just laptops, but also desks, chairs, keyboards, and other hardware. Creating an office environment that developers want to work in is a fruitful step towards their happiness:
“A healthy work environment with no toxic relationships is important to me. I’d love to work in a place that has no office politics. I hate that.”
“I believe developers would be happier if there were greater availability of delicious healthy food options, and in general the company promoted a healthy well-being and lifestyle. My company took an active approach to that in 2019 and I was very happy with the results.”
Learning Opportunities: “It takes a lifetime to learn and a good developer dies learning.”
The most common reason we, at Honeypot, hear for developers changing jobs is the lack of growth and learning opportunities in their current role. 58% of respondents described learning opportunities as very important to their happiness at work, while only 20% said they were very satisfied.
In the open questions, developers often reported they had “lost [their] learning curve” and wished for opportunities to learn new technologies, to engage in greater challenges, and to work in a more collaborative environment.
We identified two types of learning that are important to developers. One is creative or technical learning and the second is career growth. In the former, developers learn by doing, either autonomously or through mentorship. In the latter, developers define career goals with a manager and make a concerted effort to reach an agreed point.
For both creative learning and career growth, developers need time. In a world of such rapid technological change, the ability to learn is crucial to any employee’s success and should be encouraged throughout one’s career:
“An emphasis on value produced over hours worked, because the hours spent learning and getting your skills to a point where it’s a valuable commodity can’t be discounted once you’re good enough to produce value at a lower turnaround time.”
Career growth is a priority for many developers. Still, respondents report that as they gain more coding experience, they often feel herded into leadership positions and must provide support for junior developers.
While this can certainly be a huge opportunity for some, it also leaves many feelings neglected in their own growth. They code less, engage in more administrative tasks, and must play office politics, which explains why satisfaction with learning opportunities diminishes from nine years of experience onwards.
According to StackOverflow, only one in four developers want to become managers. One developer commented:
“A more flexible career path where one can face more technical challenges and increase their salary without the obligation of moving towards a “people manager” position.”
Career pathing is not an easy task: there is a lack of standardization among titles between companies and it can often feel like an over-engineered process. Nevertheless, a concerted effort between engineering and HR teams can create structures that allow people to understand which route they want to take. Otherwise, companies will lose talented people:
“Stagnation in the same position doesn’t make a developer happy. Here I mean having a clear and transparent career path (one of the main reasons for me to look for a new position after being in the same company for over five years).”
Salary: Money is important but it doesn’t buy happiness
The relationship between money and happiness has been debated for years. Countless studies have tried to establish a link between people’s earnings and their emotional well-being. Large scale reviews of research confirm that the amount of income does matter, but only to the point of being able to afford a “comfortable” lifestyle. Beyond this, happiness seems to plateau.
Recent research pinpointed $95,000 as the exact figure at which salary no longer increases our sense of well-being. The researchers suggested that it is not higher income itself which drives reductions in well-being, but rather the fact that high salaries are often accompanied by higher work demands, increased material demands, and, importantly, increased social comparison.
In our findings, developers described salary as the second-least important factor in establishing happiness at work. However, it seems that developers are far from reaching the satiation point, just 15% of respondents describe themselves as very satisfied with their salary.
Geography also plays a role in determining salary satisfaction. According to our results, developers are most satisfied with their salaries in Eastern Europe, closely followed by North America.
The high salary satisfaction in Eastern Europe is interesting, considering the average income is lower than in other parts of Europe. Certain Eastern European countries have large outsourcing industries, which could mean higher salaries than the average person. In Ukraine, for example, over 60% of developers work for outsourcing companies, and the average annual salary of an outsourced developer in Eastern Europe is €76,900.
Just under a quarter of developers in North America are very satisfied with their salaries. Five of the top 10 most in-demand jobs in the US are software engineers. Frontend engineers had the best jobs in 2020, as measured by demand and satisfaction, according to Glassdoor. Frontend engineers earn $105,240 on average per year, the exact peak of salary satisfaction in the US for single households.
Once again, developers in Southern European countries get the short end of the stick. They are the least satisfied with salary and according to the OECD, the average salary for a developer in Spain and Portugal, the southern European countries with the largest number of developers, is €28,000. This is just over half of the average salary of their Northern European counterparts in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark.
While developers do not rate salary as particularly important in our study, it is clear that many of them do not feel fairly paid.
While both men and women place equal importance on salary, female developers tend to be more satisfied than male developers with their salaries. In 2019, InHerSight found that overall, women working in the tech industry report the highest salary satisfaction of all industries.
Despite high levels of salary satisfaction amongst female developers, we found strong evidence of the gender pay gap. Every developer who completed our survey added their salary. When starting their careers, pay is almost equal. However, after two years of experience, the gap increases, with women on average earning 9% less than men.
Regional variance draws a more extreme picture. In no region are male and female developers paid equally. In Eastern Europe, male developers are paid 22% less than female developers on average, though the sample size is too small to be conclusive. In every other region, men are paid more than women. The largest pay gaps are North and South America.
Tech Stack: Ask the developers what they want
While the tech industry moves quickly, companies don’t need to adopt every new, sparkly language, framework or library released.
And while tech stack ranks as the least important factor in determining developers’ happiness at work in our survey, it is still considered very important by almost 30% of developers and somewhat important by a further 48%.
Through our data, we found that developers are most satisfied with the tech stack they use at the start of their careers. Satisfaction levels gradually decrease with each additional year of experience, reaching the lowest dissatisfaction levels between 15-17 years of experience. After that point, satisfaction increases again slightly, but never again reaches the satisfaction levels of new joiners.
Poor code quality and sloppy coding practices, unexplained broken code, and imposed limitations on development are common frustrations developers face, slowing down their output, and leading to frustration and feelings of inadequacy.
Developers are frustrated with companies who rush into technical, infrastructure or architecture decisions without developer input. And misapplication or reimaginings of software development methodologies, like Agile, or startup trends, like MVPs, have also left a bitter taste for many:
“If there is one thing that made my work less and less enjoyable in the last few years, it is the horror of inappropriately and pseudo-religiously applied so-called “agile” principles. For someone who worked as a developer for 20+ years, I can definitely say that my craft has been horribly devalued by all kinds of coaches, bad middle management and consultants trying to force their view on what software development should be, onto people who would have done an excellent job doing their shit – just being left alone and in peace.”
The solution to dissatisfaction over tech stack? Pretty simple — involvement. One developer explains:
“We need to involve developers in the process of making decisions about tools, frameworks, best practices, and business requirements. We need to adopt software craftsmanship rules and collective code ownership on a bigger scale.”
“I think for most developers the perfect job would be the research field, to discover and give solutions to new problems every day.”
Engagement, motivation, and happiness
Developers have been clear about what makes them happy at work, and it isn’t necessarily extrinsic factors like salary. In their own words, a healthy work-life balance, the ability to engage in continuous learning and career growth, and being a part of a healthy work environment and company culture are most conducive to their overall well-being and happiness.
Companies racking their brains for ways to increase developer happiness in the workplace, need to simplify their strategy — provide opportunities for developers to speak up and listen to their responses. And take happiness seriously; it’s not just an ethical imperative, it’s an economic one.
Snapshot Quality of Life
- Developers in Denmark, Austria, and Norway have the best quality of life.
- Healthcare is the most important predictor of a developer’s quality of life happiness — 59% of developers consider it to be very important.
- Developers in the British Isles are least happy with their quality of life.
- Access to mental health services is a priority for developers: the best mental healthcare is in Northern Europe.
Where we live affects every aspect of our being. It affects our perception, our politics, our material well-being — and our happiness. In this snapshot, we look at how developers evaluate the importance of and their satisfaction with cost of living, healthcare, education, transport, and climate of where they live.
For developers, access to healthcare is the number one most important predictor of their happiness with their quality of life. This is followed by education and childcare, and then cost of living.
A wealth of research reveals that health and happiness are self-reinforcing: happiness is beneficial to health and good health is recognized as a foundation of happiness. In our survey, 59% of developers cited healthcare as “very important” and 31% considered themselves “very satisfied.”
Satisfaction with healthcare varies between regions of the world and is an important consideration for developers thinking about relocation. Developers in Northern and Western Europe are most satisfied with their access to healthcare since it’s subsidized and they can rely on extensive mental health services. Developers from Eastern Europe were most dissatisfied with their access to healthcare. According to the European Commission, public health spending in Eastern Europe is well below EU average.
Healthcare is not simply about physical health. A study published in the International Journal of Social Sciences revealed developers are more likely to experience burnout than colleagues performing mechanical tasks. Many developers are aware of the threat posed by burnout and extreme stress. Mental health was very frequently mentioned in the comments:
“I feel like almost all developers go through depression and anxiety at some stage.”
Mental health has been a topic in the developer world for many years. In its annual developer survey, StackOverflow reported that almost 15% of respondents said they suffered from a mental health issue, such as anxiety, depression, or ADHD.
Mental health problems are one of the main causes of the overall disease burden worldwide. Despite this, 70% of people who need mental health services lack access to care. Studies from Eastern Europe, where developers are least happy about healthcare services, found that those who need mental health support and services aren’t seeking it, and those who do seek help aren’t always given proper treatment.
To improve access and treatment, four recommendations exist: tackle stigma, build more treatment and research capacity, implement prevention programs to decrease the incidence of mental disorders, and scale-up sustainable public health systems to improve access to mental health treatment using evidence-based interventions.
Companies can play their part in improving developers’ mental health by supporting initiatives to reduce stigma and encourage greater access to preventative care. It would certainly be appreciated by developers, as suggested by some of our respondents:
“I’d want to see more contributions or incentives for companies to take care of our mental health and give opportunities for therapy. I feel like it’s a kind of taboo to say to my boss, or even my work colleagues, that I need or have therapy because the work that I’m doing is very stressful.”
Aside from that, developers themselves should feel empowered to prioritize their personal mental health within the work context by sharing the burden with managers and colleagues, by setting routines, and understanding personal triggers.
Northern European developers are the happiest when it comes to their quality of life, which is consistent with the World Happiness Reports. Developers located in Denmark, Austria and Norway top our ranking.
Popular quality of life indices, such as The Economist’s Liveability Index and Mercer’s Quality of Life index look at a city, rather than country level, giving a more nuanced picture of quality of life. Again, consistent with our findings, Vienna, Austria’s capital city, and Copenhagen, Denmark’s capital, feature in both lists.
In 2018 and 2019, Vienna topped The Global Liveability Index. Likewise, the city earned the top place on the Mercer Quality of Living City Ranking for ten consecutive years. These reports look at various qualitative and quantitative factors across categories such as stability, crime, healthcare, personal freedom, housing, recreation, culture, environment, education, public transport, and infrastructure. Out of a possible 100 points on the Economist’s report, Vienna scored 99.1.
Social Freedom is the extent of social and personal freedom and connectedness one feels in the society in which they live. It is the extent to which people have the opportunity to speak, act, and pursue happiness without unnecessary external restrictions. We asked developers their opinions about gender and LGBTQ+ equality, safety, religious freedom, political freedom, and social cohesion.
Safety is the most important factor determining developers’ happiness within their societies. Physical safety is protection from risks, including crime and violence, and a perceived lack of physical safety can also affect subjective well-being more than the real impact of any threat.
Developers located in Northern Europe and Western Europe are most satisfied with the safety levels in their countries. This is consistent with The Global Peace Index (GPI), which measures the absence of violence or the fear of violence across three domains: safety and security, ongoing conflict, and militarisation. In the GPI 2020, European countries account for 17 of the top 25 countries.
According to the GPI, Iceland is the highest-ranking country both globally and in Europe. Turkey is the only European country to be ranked in the bottom 25 least peaceful countries.
The economic impact of violence on the global economy in 2019 was $14.5 trillion in purchasing power parity terms. This figure is equivalent to 10.6% of the world’s economic activity (gross world product) or $1,909 per person.
Safety is more of a priority for female developers than male developers. 74% of female developers consider it very important, compared to 54% of men. In fact, female developers give higher weight than male developers to all indicators of social freedom.
Older developers are less satisfied with indicators of social freedom than younger developers. Research shows that as people age, they are more likely to believe that a current culture is ‘in decline,’ which is based on a tendency to remember positive experiences rather than negative ones. Scientists call this The Reminiscence Bump, or Declinism, and could be a plausible explanation for the results shown below.
Safety feeds into all other factors of social freedom — safety to express one’s identity, follow one’s chosen religion, or interact with one’s colleagues and neighbors. The following maps show that we are still a long way from a safe global society for all.
- Access to online communities and developer networks is the most important factor for developer happiness within their community.
- For the best sense of physical community, developers should consider moving to the British Isles, where happiness levels for this indicator are the highest.
Humans are social creatures. The frequency of our contact with others, the quality of our personal relationships, and our ability to pursue interests with others are crucial determinants of our well-being. In this section we examine developer attitudes towards professional communities, friendships, and recreational opportunities.
For developers, social relationships formed through online networks and developer communities contribute more than any other factor to their sense of community happiness.
While COVID-19 catapulted online socializing into the mainstream, for developers, online networks and communities are nothing new. Online creative communities have been developing large, open-source software for decades. It is virtually impossible to find large applications today that do not rely on open source in some form or another. By 2019, more than 44 million repositories existed on GitHub alone.
Aside from open source, millions of interactions are happening each day across forums and platforms, like Discord, StackOverflow, Twitter, and others, which empower developers to find like-minded people with common interests.
The British Isles is where developers are happiest with the communities they have access to. In the United Kingdom and Ireland 94 and 95% of people respectively believe that they know someone they could rely on in time of need, more than the OECD average of 89%.
With this report, we sought to better understand developer happiness and well-being by exploring four key factors: career, quality of life, social freedoms, and community. Well-being operates in a self-reinforcing positive feedback loop — happiness in one area of your life drives and impacts your happiness in others.
Our research highlights how developer happiness drives productivity, motivation, and code quality. We show the importance of work-life balance, positive work environments, and learning opportunities. We also demonstrate that happiness is more than just a satisfying career and that psychological and physical safety, access to healthcare, and online communities also play significant roles in a developer’s happiness.
Our data also highlights some disparities between segments of the developer population. Geographically, Northern European developers are the happiest. Age-wise, developers at the start of their career tend to be more satisfied than more experienced developers — perhaps not a surprise given ageism in tech starts at 29.
We also found differences in how male and female developers attribute their happiness. Female developers are happier overall. And despite a noticeable pay gap, female developers are more satisfied with their salaries than their male counterparts. Whatsmore, female developers consider all social freedom factors to be more important to their happiness than men do.
As research around developer happiness grows, we hope to see more organizations creating and fostering improved working conditions and, in turn, promote healthier and happier environments for developers. We also hope to see developers continue to prioritize their happiness by making informed decisions about their work and lives.