As I wrote yesterday, the iPad is dominating, it’s a changing the way people consume online content and as everyone by now has heard, Old Media has been latching onto the iPad with the hope that it will be a lifeboat. However, I’m not going to get into the “can the iPad save Old Media” discussion here – nearly every angle in that discussion has been hashed out already. No, I’m going to focus instead on another medium that some consider to be “dying” – RSS.
A little background info
First of all, let’s take a second to touch on “the death of RSS” conversation that somewhat raged last year at the hight of the Twitter frenzy. Basically, the argument (brought to the forefront by Steve Gillmor) for the death of RSS went/goes something like this: Twitter, and especially Twitter-focused clients do a much better job of not only doing exactly what RSS does, but adds another layer on top because retweeting (especially by people that a user follows) of a link pushes the most interesting content to the top.
Some of the arguments against the death of RSS include: RSS is a vital part of distributing content across the Web; people continue to sign up for RSS feeds, so they can’t be dead; RSS is built on open standards and Twitter is a proprietary system, so open = better. The fight against the perception of the death of RSS has mostly been lead by Dave Winer, often referred to as the “father of RSS”.
Twitter doesn’t cover everything
Here’s my take: while Twitter is a great way to find new content and catch the most important stories, having a comprehensive RSS feed has its advantages. First of all, not all blogs have a bot set up to auto generate tweets when they post, meaning that often either posts come up on Twitter slower or not at all.
Secondly, not all blogs even have Twitter accounts – especially once you start going away from tech-centric blogs, more niche blogs often don’t bother to have dedicated Twitter accounts – the author of the blog may simply send out the link from their personal Twitter account instead.
This is why Twitter Lists don’t really work all that well as a pure RSS feed replacement. However, even if you’re not a big fan of Lists in their present form, they do almost meet this need, especially for popular blog feeds, which has sped up the bleeding of RSS (Lists were introduced only last November, many months after the “death of RSS” debate had already begun).
If only there was a device…
So in my opinion, RSS still has some value that Twitter just hasn’t quite yet matched. That said, I almost never read feeds because I find consuming them on my laptop to be tedious. Maybe I just don’t have time to sit and read all of those stories while I sit at my desk. Maybe I’m just not comfortable enough. If only I could read all those RSS feeds lying down on the couch, or out on the grass…
…oh yeah, my iPad…
As it seems with all media, RSS may find new life on the iPad. While we haven’t found any killer RSS apps yet (there may very well be one already, please let us know in the comments), the potential for one is honestly pretty low hanging fruit.
RSS iPad apps
For example, an app that shows your feed from Google Reader (or wherever) in a left hand column in landscape mode and then (quickly) loads the story you click into a larger column to the right, plus seamless sharing integration (Twitter, Facebook, Digg, etc) and RSS could be fun again. Perhaps even offer the option of importing Twitter Lists right into the app, so that there is no need to jump back into Twitter for your news. Of course, another option would be to bring in Google Reader into an iPad Twitter client such as Twitteriffic.
Hard to add feeds on the iPad
On the downside, however, one of the things that isn’t easy to do with the iPad is subscribing to feeds (iPad Safari + lack of multi-tasking makes it tougher than it should be) so to make a well rounded solution to encourage the consumption of feeds, it would help if either Apple or a developer could make this a lot easier.
A fighting chance
So if this low-hanging-fruit-RSS-iPad-app suddenly materializes, will it arrive in time or will it be too late to save a popular publishing medium that at one point seemed like the de-facto way to consume the news? Sound familiar? Of course it does, but to be fair to RSS, RSS was born of the Web, publishes instantaneously, and can easily be integrated into an app. That pedigree gives it a real fighting chance on the iPad if a developer or two can make some really compelling reading experiences out of that little ubiquitous radio button that sits on millions of websites.















I use NewsRack on my iPad and it does (almost) everything you are asking for here. Give it a try!
cheers, will check out NewsRack tonight!
Yep, me 2, i read your article in Newsrack on iPad and all i did in my had was check,check, its all there ;-). Works like à charm
Have you tried Skygrid on the iPad? Personally that’s how I like getting my news now.
And, wait until you see what is coming in June onto the iPad. It’ll totally change your reading experience, but I can’t talk about it cause I’m under NDA.
Yep, I use Skygrid, it’s pretty sweet. Will certainly look out for the news this month too, thanks for stopping by Robert!
NetNewsWire is about 90% of the way there. It’s actually better reading RSS on my iPad than my Mac, now. And Instapaper integration makes it killer.
I read your post with NetNewsWire on my iPad. I have it for my Mac, my iPhone, and my iPad. All three synced to my Google Reader account. I use it every day to catch up!
Surprised no mention of Pulse
haven’t tried it yet – literally came out when I was writing this post
Google reader for now but waiting on Feedly to get it’s act together.
I don’t know about anyone else, but I spend lots of time in an easy chair browsing my feeds in Google Reader on my Android phone, and it works great. Twitter is great but also chaotic. It requires you to check your stream constantly or you’re liable to miss important stuff (maybe lists is a way to get around that, can’t claim to being a Twit officiando yet in that regard). But be it Twitter or RSS, I still am not convinced that a tablet can better a smart phone for reading utility and function.
Just got my hands on Early Edition yesterday and it really is a blast to read my feed with this reader. The only thing missing would be to be able to sync what I read with google reader, so I don’t have to go over it twice from different computers.
yes, a lot of people like Early Edition as well
Byline and Reeder are my two favorite reader apps for the iPhone. Both are working on iPad versions, with Reeder for iPad currently in review.
Reading this from netnewswire (Google reader app for iPhone/ipad) on the subway made me laugh out loud. I’ve been using iPhone as only rss reader for over 2 years now and it made my traveling a breeze!
Yes, the mobile vs tablet discussion here is important. Personally, I like the auto-load view in the right hand column that the iPad offers – going back and forth between screens on a phone to me personally isn’t optimal. But yes, it is a valid point that mobile phones certainly make RSS reading, well, mobile. That said, I still think that the iPad makes for so much more of a reading experience.
NetNewsWire seems to be the winner here, interesting. Also interesting: in all of these comments no one said anything against “the death of RSS” concept. Interesting.
RSS doesn’t need rescuing more and more things are using it. People often don’t even realize they are consuming an RSS feed in many cases. RSS is not dieing.
The best RSS app for the iPhone is unquestionably Reeder. The iPad version has just been submitted to the App Store. I’m waiting for it to get out impatiently, because right now the available RSS apps for iPad are not especially good.