If you had asked me what price point the Nokia Lumia 900 Windows Phone handset would retail for (on contract) here in the United States, I would have said $199.99 ($200). That’s the effective ‘standard’ price point for new, top-tier smartphones.
The Lumia 900 is, as we have noted, Nokia’s premier handset. Therefore, I would have said, it will be sold for the effective going rate for such devices. As it turns out, I had it wrong. According to BGR, the darn thing is going to sell for $99 on AT&T, starting this March. Hot dang.
For reference, Apple’s top of the line phone, the iPhone 4S, costs $200 with a contract. It sells its other phones, the iPhone 4 and the iPhone 3GS for lesser amounts. However, the highest end devices have long sold for roughly two hundred dollars. That’s where the market found a traction point of profitability, and consumer acceptance.
However, while Apple has toed that line for some time, Android is moving up. New, top-tier Android handsets now cost, in some circumstances, $300, a 50% increase from $200, and some three times what the Lumia 900 is set to cost. Here’s what this means, so far as I can tell: Android OEMs, long battling over how to one up each other with features and gizmos, have had to raise their prices as the hardware they are building becomes increasingly complex. In comparison, the single core Lumia 900 is relatively stodgy.
However, it’s a fantastic device.
In other words, Nokia, by selling the phone for $100, is making a massive value proposition: a phone that rivals the iPhone 4S on looks and usability, for half the cost. Android can only say, in response to that, that it has the second most popular app store and faster chips in its phones. I doubt that consumers are going to find that very appealing.
Therefore, if the rumor is right and the Lumia 900 will in fact be so cheap, I suspect that it will greatly expand the market share of Windows Phone, at the expense of Android. I honestly don’t see the iPhone line suffering from a new insurgent, much as it has continued to excel even in the face of Android.
A $100 Lumia 900 would catapult Windows Phone up the sales charts, and make Nokia not only relevant, but a real player once again. Let’s see if it happens.


















Can't wait to get my Lumia 900 (unlocked of-course-don't have AT&T where i live),looks pretty much like Nokia/MSFT are onto something good. Cheers !
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likelol..why do you people bother about the number of cores that runs on your phone ??I can have 16 cores or whatever running a version of Android..does that make me cool ///
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeInternet Marketing And it would still lag! Lol
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI'm hoping the Lumia will be hacked to run on Android!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeStodgy? Really?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLOL the bobo phones of the IT world. And on CRAP T&T.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like@Cyber Slammer Gago
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAnd what makes you think people will actually buy a Nokia phone?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAnkit Bathija The phone looks amazing, and WP7 actually looks decent.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIf I had a nickle for every article biased towards Androud, id be a quantillionair. Numbers speak for themselves, android owns 50% of all smartphones WUT??
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeparamount
I am actually dumber for having read your comment,
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeparamount TNW has never, nor will we ever write about Androud. I don't even think Androud is a real thing :P
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHarrison Weberparamount
typos makes everyone go nuts
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like