On one hand, we have to give credit to Adobe for its release today. 6 new applications, plus a platform for file sharing is a big deal. So let’s first take a look at everything that was included:
- Photoshop Touch – Exactly what you’d think, with some great tablet-only features built in.
- Collage – Find inspirational images, create storyboards from them.
- Debut – A presentation app for your Adobe-powered designs.
- Ideas – Vector-based drawing for the tablet.
- Kuler – Color-theme generator, tied to a creative community.
- Pronto – Interactive wireframing tool.
- Creative Cloud – Work from tablets or computers, transfer files and access from any Internet-enabled device
There can be no doubt, Adobe has been hard at work making things happen for tablet users. The apps look great, the demos are incredibly solid and it should prove to be a boon for productivity on the go.
That is, unless you use an iPad.
You see, Adobe apparently forgot that, for most people the word tablet is defined as “iPad”. No matter how much ground Android-based tablets are putting behind them, they simply aren’t catching up with Apple’s trend-setting device at a pace that anyone would call impressive. In fact, recent studies are showing that Apple’s iOS holds nearly 55% of the entire mobile browsing market, with Android making up only 16.26% In anyone’s world, this is a missed opportunity for Adobe. Granted, this is mobile browsing, but it’s a good litmus test for the “smart device” mobile market as a whole.
Things could look up in the future. Adobe says that it plans on “an announcement regarding iOS availability in early 2012.” The problem here? That’s still at least 3 months away, and that’s 3 months of lost time, ignoring the vast majority of the tablet market.
Interestingly, as you read through the Adobe releases regarding the apps, you’ll notice that there’s very little brand mention at all. It’s as if Adobe was purposely burying the fact that the apps aren’t yet available for iOS, and the use of the generic “tablet” term might be enough to hide it. Sorry Adobe. That didn’t work.
It’s admirable to see companies that are taking the Android-first route, but for a company that prides itself on being used by creatives, ignoring the largest userbase of creatives seems like an ill-fated move. The apps will likely see some use, but there’s just no excuse for telling iPad users that they have to wait, with the market being as it is today.


















Nice paid "opinion" article :P
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNikos Roussos Wait, what? You actually think, even for a moment, that Apple has paid me to write this? Hah! Let me know when you wake up, but in the mean time troll harder. It's not working yet.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWell put matthewfabb. I don't think that Adobe is stupid enough to miss the iPad revenue opportunity and it would not be a retribution, but as said - makes sense to release something on Android first for a change. No point in slamming iPad or Android, both have good parts. In anycase I am not sure how much i will really use this suite.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeF*** the ipad. Let them make them for Android and WP7 and they'll do fine. If people want a tablet with these awesome Adobe appls they'll have to buy something other than the ipad...good for Adobe! They didn't pussy out.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeSounds like petty retribution from when Apple was saying Flash is dead. Whatever, it's their loss of revenue.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJohn Nack From Adobe mentions on his blog that Adobe Carousel, Ideas, Photoshop Express, Eazel, Color Lava, Nav all came out on iOS first. So going to Android first with Adobe Photoshop Touch shows in his words "it’s good to support customers across platforms". Note that Photoshop Touch for Android isn't out yet and is only coming out in Novemember. So it could be as little as 2 months difference, which to me doesn't seem to be that much.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI don't blame them.
Some developers chose to develop EXCLUSIVELY on iOS and then, maybe, after several month they'll publish an Android Port of their app.
This time, Adobe choose to develop first for android and THEN for iOS and, honestly, i don't see anything wrong with it if they'll port this app also to iOS.
Maybe you're starting to understand that other tablet exists?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDomenico Casillo I don't doubt that there's a market for other tablets. Heck, I own a Galaxy 10.1. But I do know that it's not the lion's share of the market, and I think it's foolhardy to act otherwise.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeTechnically, it makes a lot more sense to start with iOS first, since there are fewer hardware profiles to support. When you first release a mobile app, you want to spend the vast majority of your time adding features and weeding out the biggest bugs, not reconciling differences in screen resolutions and brand-specific idiosyncrasies. Domenico Casillo
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAndre Kibbe That's not a good reason to build first on iOS. Building app on Android is as complicated as is on Windows. That's the same scenario: lots of different hardware, different O.S. version and so on. But still, there are more apps on windows than on OSX for example. Moreover, i think it's quite impossible to support all different android devices out there BEFORE a release . The best way to do that is to release the 1.0 and then do bugfixes if necessary. Keep in mind that if you follow Android's dev guidelines, probably you'll have only few things to bugfix and nothing more.
Brad McCarty I also own an Asus Transformer and an iPad2 and i agree with you since Android for tablet is still far from being as popular as iPad..but what i wanted to say is that finally, a big player in the App world, chose to develop FIRST for android and THEN for the iPad. At this point, the market share isn't so important cause soon, the app will be also available on the iPad: it's just a matter of choice.If you look back, even if Android on smartphone rules the world (in terms of numbers) there are still a lot of apps that are released first on ios then on android, or, in the worst case, exclusively on iOS. All i want to say is that i'm happy with it but, to be honest, i prefer a simultaneously release both on Android and iOS :)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like