Though Facebook itself hasn’t made much of a public stance for or against SOPA and PIPA, it’s safe to say that the company has now made its feelings known, through the words of its CEO. Mark Zuckerberg, on his personal Facebook profile, has stated the following:
“The internet is the most powerful tool we have for creating a more open and connected world. We can’t let poorly thought out laws get in the way of the internet’s development. Facebook opposes SOPA and PIPA, and we will continue to oppose any laws that will hurt the internet.”
Zuck then continues with his thoughts, saying that we need better representation in Government:
“The world today needs political leaders who are pro-internet. We have been working with many of these folks for months on better alternatives to these current proposals. I encourage you to learn more about these issues and tell your congressmen that you want them to be pro-internet.”
The post had gathered over 75,000 likes in 10 minutes, and by some accounts had topped 3,000 likes in under 60 seconds.
zuckerberg issues statement about SOPA, 3K likes in under a minute on.fb.me/Lz26N cc @digiphile
— Greg Ferenstein (@ferenstein) January 18, 2012
There’s considerably more discussion on a page that he links concerning Facebook’s stance on piracy bills. Specifically, it addresses SOPA and PIPA, but then goes further to talk about how you can report IP infringement on Facebook.
“We understand the concerns of the film and music industries, as well as other content creators and trademark owners, and we have been engaging in a constructive dialogue on the most effective ways to combat piracy. However, we must ensure that Congress does not do anything in this area that threatens the security of the Internet, hampers U.S. innovation or competitiveness, or sets harmful precedents for other governments to follow.”
The issue is so important to Zuck, it would seem, that he’s broken Twitter silence for the first time in nearly three years:
Tell your congressmen you want them to be pro-internet. My Facebook post is here: facebook.com/zuck/posts/101…
— Mark Zuckerberg (@finkd) January 18, 2012
Facebook has chosen to not “black out” for the day, but with potential losses topping $11 million if it did, it’s understandable. There’s still plenty or representation, however, from sites like Reddit, TNW and even Google.


















Understandable?! Facebook stood to lose exactly the same amount of money as everyone else did: one day's earnings. $11m is a lot less important to Facebook than $100 is to someone who earns $36,500.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likehatfinch Your comparison is contradicting. Facebook has thousands of employees on payroll who earn $36,500~. Fucking dumbass
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHack You're quite right, I had forgotten that Facebook is just scraping by, barely covering its operating costs.
That'll be how Mark Zuckerberg has managed to amass an estimated personal fortune of $17.5 billion in the 8 years it has existed.
That's more than $11m every two days -- into Zuckerberg's pocket alone.
Next time you're tempted to call someone a "fucking dumbass", take a long hard look in the mirror first.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeThat's the correct stand to take. At least we can agree with Zuckerberg on this one.
And the correct spelling is "Internet", BTW.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOscar Goldman This is not true bro, a long time ago "internet" isn't more "Internet". Today, the word internet is treated in the same way like any other media: television, radio, etc., so you don't need to use the capital letter. Both are completely valid anyway.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeCheap Cars For Sale
I thought a bit about this, and while your argument holds some water, I say that "Internet" still has value because it separates the Internet from computer networks in general. There are intranets, private networks, all kinds of alternative networks. There may be internets that are not the public Internet. But are there? I don't know.
But there are much bigger grammatical fish to fry, like the sudden inability of a vast number of people to spell "too." That's even worse than "you're."
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOscar Goldman Just FYI. ;)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeOscar Goldman As a general rule, we capitalize Internet on TNW. However, the quote was a copy/paste from Zuck, so you'll have to bring up the issue to him ;)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeBrad McCarty
If that were the biggest problem with him and Facebook, we'd all be fortunate.
But yes, I've noticed your high level of editorial competence!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like335,000 after 4 hours and counting! this guy has more voice than the president Obama! Zuckerberg 2012-2016
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeZuck Dawg!!! lol
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like