Amazon has released it’s annual press release giving statistics of its Christmas sales and record breakers. The headline on the release, “for the first time ever, customers purchased more Kindle books than physical books”. Impressive and evidently a push for bloggers and journalists to reflect the fact in our posts, articles and reports.
Amazon and Bezos well deserve the success the device has received so far. I don’t own the device myself but reports from articles, friends and colleagues, have been remarkably positive. That said, is The Kindle going to be one of the most prominent rise and falls in gadget history? Bear with me, but I’m revisiting Apple’s upcoming tablet release (rumored to be called iSlate or Magic Slate).
If Apple, once again, does what it’s done for the phone and audio player but for tablets, which here I am proposing it will, how The Kindle can possibly succeed is beyond me. An Apple employee is reported as saying “You will be very surprised how you interact with the new tablet.” which of course could mean anything, but let’s assume that being a tablet created by Apple it will be slick, easy to use and closer to a multimedia magazine/newspaper than any device has come before.
Therefore, turning pages rather then scrolling down, thinner and lighter than the Kindle, multitouch, and just as easy to purchase, download & read ebooks and documents. It should be a snappier, faster and smoother experience than the Kindle with a rich colorful UI to boot, and above all else a do-it-all device which incorporates a computer, e-reader, media player and portable television all in one.

At this point, I’d like to reiterate the fact these are assumptions and based on Apple’s disruptive track history, in many respects the Google of the gadget world, venturing into markets many have thought dead or too established to enter, and transforming them. But based on these, Apple’s tablet should put an end – or at least a large dent – to The Kindle’s successes.
While Amazon may never admit to regretting its venture into e-publishing gadgetry, I’m convinced that before long the online behemoth will have wished they’d rather partnered with the likes of Apple (and other future tablet manufacturers) to ensure built in purchasing/downloading of its books rather than creating a gadget of their own for it, something that they can of course still.
Another avenue to consider is what if Amazon itself decided to turn the Kindle into a its own tablet computer? It’s unlikely, but with Bezos as CEO, it’s difficult to put past them and frankly, many might consider it Amazon’s only option if it wants its Kindle to survive. That said, if Amazon manages to drop the price of the Kindle to something less than 100$ mark then its a different product altogether. At its current price $259, is anyone in their right mind going to buy a Kindle over a full fledged tablet. At less than a $100 however, it’s almost disposable, and Amazon might make a loss on the hardware but should sell enough to easily be able to recoup the loss via worldwide e-book sales.
In the end, the ball is in Apple’s court, we could all (including myself) be left red faced at yet another failed attempt to create a usable Tablet, with Apple’s recent successes however, I sincerely doubt it.















I am a gadget junkie but I feel no excitement for the kindle at all.
Now the iPad, that one has my wallet open already.
Speculation is part of what we do, yes. But my god, lets take a step back and look at reality here.
Gizmodo and TechCrunch are beating this to death, how many events now was Apple supposed to announce the Apple tablet?
I give you credit, at least in this post you said this post is based off assumptions. At least you are not writing this post like the Apple tablet is already here.
It is really time we stop speculating about the now deemed iSlate until it comes out, or if it does at all.
Really, the rumor mill is getting a bit old and this “iSlate” won’t kill off everything (I swear, every other day it is killing yet ANOTHER product by a competitor that has a screen).
Moving along…
Just got a Kindle for Christmas and I love it. Frankly, after spending all day at work looking at a glowing monitor, I have to say the e-ink of the Kindle is soothing. I don’t care what the iSlate will be able to do. If you only want to read books, the kindle is perfect. Got an iphone for everything else.
One nice thing is unless you are buying the latest best sellers, things are a lot cheaper, Collected Works of Shakespeare $2.97, if I recall correctly. Picked up a couple Conan Doyle Sherlock Holes stories for free a couple months back. Also you don’t have to go anywhere to get the book and it doesn’t take up physical space. The e-ink still isn’t as nice as a book, but all in all its a neat product.
http://healthjournalclub.blogspot.com/
I’ve had my kindle about a year and I love it. I work at remote job sites a lot and really appreciate the fact that the e-ink screen is very low power. I can read on that device for a week without plugging it in. Very nice. I don’t need another ‘multimedia device’ when I’m on the road, I’ve already got my laptop. It’s a good example of a device that is simple and does one thing well. Kind of like my ipod when I think on it…
I always said, the kindle was tooo much expensive, and worst of it all, it is just black and white.
cheers from Peru.
Aren’t you totally ignoring the fact that one of the huge selling points of the Kindle is the number of titles available through Amazon? That’s one reason it does better than the Sony reader, and it’s one reason it might easily do better than whatever Apple develops.
And if Apple does create a competitive product, precisely because Amazon first created the Kindle, they will be in a great position if they would like to partner with or simply sell their ebook collection to Apple. Even if the Kindle becomes obsolete, Amazon will reap a huge profit.
John Tantillo did a post a while back on Amazon and the Kindle that’s worth checking out: http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2009/03/01/brand-winners-and-losers-kindle-and-the-rocky-mountain-news.aspx
“Real marketing is about acknowledging constant change and satisfying shifting needs —not just plodding along with an inflexible strategy based on yesterday’s model.
In Kindle’s case, real marketing meant recognizing that many readers are clearly going to be willing “to read like that” if “reading like that” also offers other advantages, like being able to bring a library of 1500 books with you wherever you go, download a book on demand (and at a lower cost to the print version) and, last, but not least, get other content (like newspapers) instantly delivered wherever you are.”
All his posts are from a marketing perspective (whether it’s about Obama, Tiger Woods, or Amazon). Last week’s post was on ereaders, traditional publishers and Stephen Covey (who just signed an exclusive deal with Amazon to sell ebooks of his backlist titles).
Aren’t you totally ignoring the fact that one of the huge selling points of the Kindle is the number of titles available through Amazon? That’s one reason it does better than the Sony reader, and it’s one reason it might easily do better than whatever Apple develops.
And if Apple does create a competitive product, precisely because Amazon first created the Kindle, they will be in a great position if they would like to partner with or simply sell their ebook collection to Apple. Even if the Kindle becomes obsolete, Amazon will reap a huge profit.
John Tantillo did a post a while back on Amazon and the Kindle that’s worth checking out: http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2009/03/01/brand-winners-and-losers-kindle-and-the-rocky-mountain-news.aspx
“Real marketing is about acknowledging constant change and satisfying shifting needs —not just plodding along with an inflexible strategy based on yesterday’s model.
In Kindle’s case, real marketing meant recognizing that many readers are clearly going to be willing “to read like that” if “reading like that” also offers other advantages, like being able to bring a library of 1500 books with you wherever you go, download a book on demand (and at a lower cost to the print version) and, last, but not least, get other content (like newspapers) instantly delivered wherever you are.”
All his posts are from a marketing perspective (whether it’s about Obama, Tiger Woods, or Amazon). Last week’s post was on ereaders, traditional publishers and Stephen Covey (who just signed an exclusive deal with Amazon to sell ebooks of his backlist titles). http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2009/12/21/john-tantillos-brand-winner-and-loser-steven-covey–ebooks-and-traditional-books–ebooks.aspx
If Apple can get the iSlate near the $500 mark the Kindle doesn’t have a chance. islate.org
You could give me an Apple tablet and I still wouldn’t use it. It’s simple :
Reading a book from a backlit screen is not enjoyable.
This is true for most people. Otherwise people would be reading from Netbooks not Kindles right now.
Because a Netbook already offers tons of things a Kindle doesn’t for the same price. A netbook already does pretty much everything a tablet will do. So why are EReaders selling so well?
So try and see past the gadget wow factor and think about why people love eReaders. Its because they make reading more enjoyable. An LCD screen makes reading less enjoyable.
People will buy the Apple tablet for the shininess of it. But will they use it? Really?
The tablet will turn off the backlight for reading, but the question is, will it be better than eink, and what about battery life. The kindle still wins in most categories, if all you want is to read.
Hi,
I think, everybody should be glad to use a kindle. Its very nice and usefull.
Kindle is getting better and better…
Amazon’s Kindle wireless reader had a huge hurtle to overcome in order to become
more than just a gimmicky gadget that would be forgotten in a couple months after its glitzy launch.
There’s something about going to the store, purchasing a hardcopy book, and rifling through the pages
that e-books have never been able to compete with. Most of the backlash stems from the fact that the
platforms on which those books have been displayed historically haven’t been up to the task.
The screens are too small, too bright, look too much like computers, and make you feel as if you’re
still jacked into the high-tech matrix that traps us all every day of our working life.
Essentially, people buy books to get away from computers. What’s more, “book people” love books.
How could the Kindle overcome that?
See More Information HERE
Speculation is part of what we do. This is Apple we’re talking about, not just ANOTHER product by a competitor. How you can possibly not speculate or get excited by the potential of an Apple tablet based on what Apple had done for the mp3 player and mobile phone – i have no idea.