<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less is more: from blogpost to tweet to retweet.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:32:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: maki</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/#comment-387861</link>
		<dc:creator>maki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 06:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=17168#comment-387861</guid>
		<description>is my blogpost http://evoire.com/members/shockware2/ considered as mircomedia or is it already a blog? just wanted to know the difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is my blogpost <a href="http://evoire.com/members/shockware2/" rel="nofollow">http://evoire.com/members/shockware2/</a> considered as mircomedia or is it already a blog? just wanted to know the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klura. &#187; Noterat</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/#comment-387860</link>
		<dc:creator>Klura. &#187; Noterat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 07:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=17168#comment-387860</guid>
		<description>[...] Less is more: from blogpost to tweet to retweet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Less is more: from blogpost to tweet to retweet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Pradeep Kumar</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/#comment-387859</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Pradeep Kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=17168#comment-387859</guid>
		<description>Retweeting is the new trend ! ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retweeting is the new trend ! ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the one who blogs</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/#comment-387858</link>
		<dc:creator>the one who blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 14:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=17168#comment-387858</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a problem per se we produce less written content. You don&#039;t have to be verbose to be deep.

The problem is we produce more superficial content. Make something easy to use and mostly fools will use it.

A longer than 140 character blog entry needs at least some thinking and time to compose. With Twitter there is no such constraint, therefore it obviously has less quality content, because it requires less thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a problem per se we produce less written content. You don&#8217;t have to be verbose to be deep.</p>
<p>The problem is we produce more superficial content. Make something easy to use and mostly fools will use it.</p>
<p>A longer than 140 character blog entry needs at least some thinking and time to compose. With Twitter there is no such constraint, therefore it obviously has less quality content, because it requires less thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralf Rottmann</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/#comment-387857</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Rottmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=17168#comment-387857</guid>
		<description>The question is: Do authors who would have written high-quality blog articles increasingly jump to more volatile platforms, e.g. microblogging.

(Btw.: I don&#039;t like the term &quot;microblogging&quot; for Twitter either, as Twitter is more about short messaging as it is about crafting real content.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is: Do authors who would have written high-quality blog articles increasingly jump to more volatile platforms, e.g. microblogging.</p>
<p>(Btw.: I don&#8217;t like the term &#8220;microblogging&#8221; for Twitter either, as Twitter is more about short messaging as it is about crafting real content.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Waidele</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2009/05/27/less-is-more/#comment-387856</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Waidele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=17168#comment-387856</guid>
		<description>The graphic may be true when comming from an occupation which always produces written content.

But regarding myself (and many other bloggers), &quot;Blogging&quot; is not decresing the volume of written content. That is because I (we) would not write at all if we did not blog. 

Well, maybe we would, but not as much and only for ourselves. So I think that &quot;Blogging&quot; in fact does increase the volume of written content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The graphic may be true when comming from an occupation which always produces written content.</p>
<p>But regarding myself (and many other bloggers), &#8220;Blogging&#8221; is not decresing the volume of written content. That is because I (we) would not write at all if we did not blog. </p>
<p>Well, maybe we would, but not as much and only for ourselves. So I think that &#8220;Blogging&#8221; in fact does increase the volume of written content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

