<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google cannibalizing their assets? Isn&#8217;t it a bit early for that?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:18:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: bobboynton sent an edit. &#124; gooseGrade</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372516</link>
		<dc:creator>bobboynton sent an edit. &#124; gooseGrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372516</guid>
		<description>[...] worth 2 pointsOriginal: Is is part of “someEdit: It is part of “someStatus: PendingReport Abusehttp://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] worth 2 pointsOriginal: Is is part of “someEdit: It is part of “someStatus: PendingReport Abusehttp://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobboynton sent an edit. &#124; gooseGrade</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372515</link>
		<dc:creator>bobboynton sent an edit. &#124; gooseGrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372515</guid>
		<description>[...] 02th, 2008 worth 2 pointsOriginal: a few months agoEdit: A few months agoStatus: PendingReport Abusehttp://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 02th, 2008 worth 2 pointsOriginal: a few months agoEdit: A few months agoStatus: PendingReport Abusehttp://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobboynton sent an edit. &#124; gooseGrade</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372514</link>
		<dc:creator>bobboynton sent an edit. &#124; gooseGrade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372514</guid>
		<description>[...] on Dec 02th, 2008 worth 2 pointsOriginal: should, be inEdit: should be inStatus: PendingReport Abusehttp://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Dec 02th, 2008 worth 2 pointsOriginal: should, be inEdit: should be inStatus: PendingReport Abusehttp://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Witold Rugowski</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372513</link>
		<dc:creator>Witold Rugowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372513</guid>
		<description>Well so You have not visited polish webpages. In this internet region flash top layers are still very common.

And why Chrome has to have AdBlock? It won&#039;t gain market share without. Or rather without plugins, and where are plugins there AdBlock will be. 

BTW - AdBlock does not &#039;magically&#039; removes advertising from webpages. You can apply some filters based on URLs. 

I do use AdBlock - when on any site I encounter annoying ad I consider &#039;leave and not return&#039; policy :) or just add those ads to AdBlock if I can not live without site :)

So maybe AdBlock is one of reasons that popups and top layers are in decline?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well so You have not visited polish webpages. In this internet region flash top layers are still very common.</p>
<p>And why Chrome has to have AdBlock? It won&#8217;t gain market share without. Or rather without plugins, and where are plugins there AdBlock will be. </p>
<p>BTW &#8211; AdBlock does not &#8216;magically&#8217; removes advertising from webpages. You can apply some filters based on URLs. </p>
<p>I do use AdBlock &#8211; when on any site I encounter annoying ad I consider &#8216;leave and not return&#8217; policy :) or just add those ads to AdBlock if I can not live without site :)</p>
<p>So maybe AdBlock is one of reasons that popups and top layers are in decline?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattmcknight</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372512</link>
		<dc:creator>mattmcknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372512</guid>
		<description>Toby is right. The annoying ads are the flash ones on non flash pages. And they are getting worse- obscuring the whole page. Google&#039;s flash ads in youtube vids- which require you to unblock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toby is right. The annoying ads are the flash ones on non flash pages. And they are getting worse- obscuring the whole page. Google&#8217;s flash ads in youtube vids- which require you to unblock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby DiPasquale</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372511</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby DiPasquale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372511</guid>
		<description>AdBlock and the like block Flash ads. Google makes its money from paid-search text ads on its own site. They are in effect *stronger* for having those other ads blocked, not weaker. This isn&#039;t cannibalization, its market consolidation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AdBlock and the like block Flash ads. Google makes its money from paid-search text ads on its own site. They are in effect *stronger* for having those other ads blocked, not weaker. This isn&#8217;t cannibalization, its market consolidation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372510</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372510</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it did talk about that in the specifications...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it did talk about that in the specifications&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372509</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372509</guid>
		<description>He he he, that is a good one. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He he he, that is a good one. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372508</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372508</guid>
		<description>If the ad blocker just blocks flash then I&#039;d be happy still viewing Google text ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the ad blocker just blocks flash then I&#8217;d be happy still viewing Google text ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinus</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/12/02/google-cannibalizing-their-assets-isnt-it-a-bit-early-for-that/#comment-372507</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7990#comment-372507</guid>
		<description>The people that install Ad blockers won&#039;t click an ad anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people that install Ad blockers won&#8217;t click an ad anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

