<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hottest 100 mediatech companies in Europe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/11/16/the-hottest-100-mediatech-companies-in-europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/11/16/the-hottest-100-mediatech-companies-in-europe/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:07:13 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The state of innovation in Europe &#8212; Vad NU!</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/11/16/the-hottest-100-mediatech-companies-in-europe/#comment-370986</link>
		<dc:creator>The state of innovation in Europe &#8212; Vad NU!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7081#comment-370986</guid>
		<description>[...] in Europe? What are the coolest privately held tech companies? Library House just published The Mediatech 100 list, which The Next Web quotes. And looking at the list I think there are some things worth looking at from an innovation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in Europe? What are the coolest privately held tech companies? Library House just published The Mediatech 100 list, which The Next Web quotes. And looking at the list I think there are some things worth looking at from an innovation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Evers</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/11/16/the-hottest-100-mediatech-companies-in-europe/#comment-370985</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Evers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7081#comment-370985</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s really interesting Flirtomatic. The latest Direct2Mobile research (which uses tracking technology) shows that Flirtomatic is the biggest offportal mobile website. Yes. So bigger than Facebook, bigger than MySpace, bigger than Google, bigger than Yahoo and bigger than MSN. Unbelievable. A whopping 142 million page impressions p/m!

I spoke to a mobile content portal owner the other day. He told me something quite interesting: Every medium has it&#039;s own brands. Throughout the history this has been proved time and time again. When tv came around, people thought Paramount (big in cinema) was going te be big on tv. When internet came into play people thought all the big tv channels we&#039;re going to be big on internet. Now mobile comes around a lot of people seem to think the big internet brands are going to be big on mobile as well. Truth is that every medium has different strenghts and weaknesses and is used for different needs. So good internet content, would probably be bad mobile content and a good internet service will probably not be very good as a mobile service. I think this partly explains Flirtomatic&#039;s success.

Sorry, went a bit off topic there. I&#039;ll write a post some day :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really interesting Flirtomatic. The latest Direct2Mobile research (which uses tracking technology) shows that Flirtomatic is the biggest offportal mobile website. Yes. So bigger than Facebook, bigger than MySpace, bigger than Google, bigger than Yahoo and bigger than MSN. Unbelievable. A whopping 142 million page impressions p/m!</p>
<p>I spoke to a mobile content portal owner the other day. He told me something quite interesting: Every medium has it&#8217;s own brands. Throughout the history this has been proved time and time again. When tv came around, people thought Paramount (big in cinema) was going te be big on tv. When internet came into play people thought all the big tv channels we&#8217;re going to be big on internet. Now mobile comes around a lot of people seem to think the big internet brands are going to be big on mobile as well. Truth is that every medium has different strenghts and weaknesses and is used for different needs. So good internet content, would probably be bad mobile content and a good internet service will probably not be very good as a mobile service. I think this partly explains Flirtomatic&#8217;s success.</p>
<p>Sorry, went a bit off topic there. I&#8217;ll write a post some day :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simone Brummelhuis</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/11/16/the-hottest-100-mediatech-companies-in-europe/#comment-370984</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone Brummelhuis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.com/?p=7081#comment-370984</guid>
		<description>And the women involved are mentioned here:
http://thenextwomen.com/2008/11/14/the-100-hottest-private-tech-companies-in-europe/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the women involved are mentioned here:<br />
<a href="http://thenextwomen.com/2008/11/14/the-100-hottest-private-tech-companies-in-europe/" rel="nofollow">http://thenextwomen.com/2008/11/14/the-100-hottest-private-tech-companies-in-europe/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

