<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did StumbleUpon and Digg just miss an emerging market?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 18:53:23 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/#comment-368884</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=5600#comment-368884</guid>
		<description>Stumbleupon has a SU Video app for android phones. Content providers don&#039;t need to create seperate content for mobile devices, they just need to script their pages to use stylesheets designed for mobile. It isn&#039;t difficult to do and the process for doing it has been around for a long time.

Posted this from my droid by the way. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbleupon has a SU Video app for android phones. Content providers don&#8217;t need to create seperate content for mobile devices, they just need to script their pages to use stylesheets designed for mobile. It isn&#8217;t difficult to do and the process for doing it has been around for a long time.</p>
<p>Posted this from my droid by the way. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joery</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/#comment-368883</link>
		<dc:creator>Joery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=5600#comment-368883</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s there.

you now can random hit youtube movies. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s there.</p>
<p>you now can random hit youtube movies. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CasaMan</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/#comment-368882</link>
		<dc:creator>CasaMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 21:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=5600#comment-368882</guid>
		<description>I like the way you&#039;re thinking but there are some problems. Digg is all about sharing interesting stories and not interesting websites. The number of interesting stories in mobile format is not enough to justify a new category. Secondly, creating a category for &quot;mobile (content)&quot; will probably confuse users too much. Does stories need to be in a mobile format or is the topic mobile content. All the other categories are topics. The only way it will work is to create a sub site (like news, videos, images). But the mobile content would not mix in well with the rest of the content so you can&#039;t use the mobile content on the digg.com homepage. 

When this mobile browsing really kicks off, a lot of content providers will offer the content in a mobile format to mobile users. If they don&#039;t we still have the fully capable mobile browser on our device. We can access the sites pretty comfortable. There will never be a need for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way you&#8217;re thinking but there are some problems. Digg is all about sharing interesting stories and not interesting websites. The number of interesting stories in mobile format is not enough to justify a new category. Secondly, creating a category for &#8220;mobile (content)&#8221; will probably confuse users too much. Does stories need to be in a mobile format or is the topic mobile content. All the other categories are topics. The only way it will work is to create a sub site (like news, videos, images). But the mobile content would not mix in well with the rest of the content so you can&#8217;t use the mobile content on the digg.com homepage. </p>
<p>When this mobile browsing really kicks off, a lot of content providers will offer the content in a mobile format to mobile users. If they don&#8217;t we still have the fully capable mobile browser on our device. We can access the sites pretty comfortable. There will never be a need for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/#comment-368881</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 10:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=5600#comment-368881</guid>
		<description>Basecamp: http://www.basecamphq.com/?source=37s+home
Pipelinedeals:  http://www.pipelinedeals.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basecamp: <a href="http://www.basecamphq.com/?source=37s+home" rel="nofollow">http://www.basecamphq.com/?source=37s+home</a><br />
Pipelinedeals:  <a href="http://www.pipelinedeals.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pipelinedeals.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joery</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/#comment-368880</link>
		<dc:creator>Joery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 08:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=5600#comment-368880</guid>
		<description>Hey there,

Nice post Joop. I&#039;m interested in things like justhit.it.
Keep it simple must have been the thought when developing this website.

I like the initiative, it works fine on my iPhone and it shows nice info &amp; games. A bookmark for me.

@ Joop, did you already find thenextweb.org on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there,</p>
<p>Nice post Joop. I&#8217;m interested in things like justhit.it.<br />
Keep it simple must have been the thought when developing this website.</p>
<p>I like the initiative, it works fine on my iPhone and it shows nice info &amp; games. A bookmark for me.</p>
<p>@ Joop, did you already find thenextweb.org on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick de Laive</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/10/16/did-stumbleupon-and-digg-just-missed-an-emerging-market/#comment-368879</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick de Laive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=5600#comment-368879</guid>
		<description>On the mobile phone I don&#039;t come a lot further then facebook (the iPhone app), twitter (via twitterific), and some dutch news sites (nu.nl).
I&#039;d like to have a mobile optimized StumbleUpon function, especially for youtube movies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the mobile phone I don&#8217;t come a lot further then facebook (the iPhone app), twitter (via twitterific), and some dutch news sites (nu.nl).<br />
I&#8217;d like to have a mobile optimized StumbleUpon function, especially for youtube movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

