Comments on: 3 reasons why Knol will beat Wikipedia

By: Gostixel

Gostixel — Sat, 16 May 2009 09:36:39 +0000

Хм,согласен с предыдущими высказываниями
^..^ Bye

By: Babylya

Babylya — Thu, 14 May 2009 05:45:45 +0000

Да,согласен с предыдущими блоггерами
^..^ :-)

By: Narayana Rao

Narayana Rao — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:25:55 +0000

Knol’s US montly visitors are around 115,000 at the moment accordig to quantcast.

What does it say about knol’s progress?

By: TheNextWeb.org: Lies, damned lies, and statistics

TheNextWeb.org: Lies, damned lies, and statistics — Wed, 30 Jul 2008 10:29:37 +0000

[...] Reality in Sweden: download a HD DVD in two seconds 2: 3 reasons why Knol will beat Wikipedia 3: Nasza-klasa: Polish example of the copy-cat [...]

By: Ben Yates

Ben Yates — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 10:28:40 +0000

You can’t copy content from Wikipeda to Knol because the licenses aren’t compatible.

By: Ackbar

Ackbar — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 14:19:56 +0000

“If you have been contributing to Wikipedia (or not), simply copy your data to Knol and get Adsense dollars from it.”

sounds like a responsible approach to collaboration

By: Library Views 圖書館觀點 » Knol 要做維基百科的維基百科

Library Views 圖書館觀點 » Knol 要做維基百科的維基百科 — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:55:20 +0000

[...] Problogger － Google’s Knol – A Wikipedia Killer or a Blog Killer? The Next Web － 3 reasons why Knol will beat Wikipedia udn數位資訊－ [...]

By: Wikipedia vs. Knol « suprfish

Wikipedia vs. Knol « suprfish — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 20:09:21 +0000

[...] Will Knol replace Wikipedia? Doubt it. But I do think that Knol will become a strong and common reference for information, much like Wikipedia is. It’d be better, too; since knols are written by one person and are not constantly changing, they are more authoritative. [...]

By: Niels Olson

Niels Olson — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:21:01 +0000

The honors surgery medical students at Tulane were just sitting around waiting for a lecture and it came up that wikipedia has become scary accurate for a lot of biomedical stuff. Like, it becomes difficult in one’s own mind to justify the primary literature research when Wikipedia is patently accurate on most of this subject matter. I’ve even had new, referenced articles on microbiology pulled because, for example, an admin, who happened to be a PhD microbiologist, felt the subject should be a redirect to a larger article. He was probably right.

The mental model that Wikipedia is maintained by 20-year losers in their parents basements listening to emo is probably not as accurate as you might like to think. Those are just the ones who have time to take pictures of themselves.

By: PJ Brunet

PJ Brunet — Fri, 25 Jul 2008 16:09:03 +0000

No matter how hard they try, Wikipedia will never contain even 1% of the world’s knowledge.

At first glance Knol feels more human to me, more part of the Internet. I probably won’t use it though, I have enough work to do on my own domains, and comments to post ;-)