<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google in negotiations to acquire Digg, good!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/07/23/google-in-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/07/23/google-in-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-good/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:31:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Google does not Digg it, walks away from the deal</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/07/23/google-in-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-good/#comment-364796</link>
		<dc:creator>Google does not Digg it, walks away from the deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=2112#comment-364796</guid>
		<description>[...] dispiriting update about Google wanting to acquire Digg, the deal is off! The guys at Digg were about to close the deal and walk away with 200 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dispiriting update about Google wanting to acquire Digg, the deal is off! The guys at Digg were about to close the deal and walk away with 200 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kauft Google digg? - Netzlogbuch</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/07/23/google-in-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-good/#comment-364795</link>
		<dc:creator>Kauft Google digg? - Netzlogbuch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=2112#comment-364795</guid>
		<description>[...] Via techcrunch.com und thenextweb.org [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via techcrunch.com und thenextweb.org [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Gladkova</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/07/23/google-in-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-good/#comment-364794</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=2112#comment-364794</guid>
		<description>Paola, absolutely correct - Google could launch a similar service in a matter of days if wanted. But I still have a feeling that Google may pursue this deal if only to annoy Microsoft where it can (which I mentioned as one of the reasons in my own post on the subject linked to under my name).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paola, absolutely correct &#8211; Google could launch a similar service in a matter of days if wanted. But I still have a feeling that Google may pursue this deal if only to annoy Microsoft where it can (which I mentioned as one of the reasons in my own post on the subject linked to under my name).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paola Bonomo</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/07/23/google-in-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-good/#comment-364793</link>
		<dc:creator>Paola Bonomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=2112#comment-364793</guid>
		<description>I tend to be more skeptical - Google has armies of engineers working to develop Digg-like features, and there is nothing much, other than a bit of buzz, that Digg per se brings to Google. See similar perspective here:
http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/07/23/digg-offers-little-to-rumored-buyer-google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to be more skeptical &#8211; Google has armies of engineers working to develop Digg-like features, and there is nothing much, other than a bit of buzz, that Digg per se brings to Google. See similar perspective here:<br />
<a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/07/23/digg-offers-little-to-rumored-buyer-google" rel="nofollow">http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/07/23/digg-offers-little-to-rumored-buyer-google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Svetlana Gladkova</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/07/23/google-in-negotiations-to-acquire-digg-good/#comment-364792</link>
		<dc:creator>Svetlana Gladkova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=2112#comment-364792</guid>
		<description>Digg may be dead for many of us but what acquisition will definitely mean is more mainstream popularity for Digg itself - Google will not only use Digg as an additional advertising property, it will also send extra traffic to Digg and this will be mainstream traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg may be dead for many of us but what acquisition will definitely mean is more mainstream popularity for Digg itself &#8211; Google will not only use Digg as an additional advertising property, it will also send extra traffic to Digg and this will be mainstream traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

