<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google desperately trying to appear like an &#8216;underdog&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/</link>
	<description>International technology news, business &#38; culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:10:27 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Google has a new Favicon, do you like it? - Joop.in China</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363566</link>
		<dc:creator>Google has a new Favicon, do you like it? - Joop.in China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363566</guid>
		<description>[...] other shocking news, Google changed their favicon again! As you might remember, Google updated their favicon to a rather *fugly* one last June. A few days later Google challenged [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other shocking news, Google changed their favicon again! As you might remember, Google updated their favicon to a rather *fugly* one last June. A few days later Google challenged [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google has a new Favicon, do you like it? &#171; TheNextWeb.com</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363565</link>
		<dc:creator>Google has a new Favicon, do you like it? &#171; TheNextWeb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363565</guid>
		<description>[...] other shocking news, Google changed their favicon again! As you might remember, Google updated their favicon to a rather *fugly* one last May. A few days later Google challenged [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other shocking news, Google changed their favicon again! As you might remember, Google updated their favicon to a rather *fugly* one last May. A few days later Google challenged [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google favicon; think you can do better? Maybe you can!</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363564</link>
		<dc:creator>Google favicon; think you can do better? Maybe you can!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363564</guid>
		<description>[...] few days ago Ernst-Jan wrote about the updated Google Favicon at this blog. It looked kind of lame and I remember thinking &#8216;I could do better than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] few days ago Ernst-Jan wrote about the updated Google Favicon at this blog. It looked kind of lame and I remember thinking &#8216;I could do better than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363563</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 01:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363563</guid>
		<description>Google maybe trying to have trade mark or brand change and testing it with favicon.
I annoys me at first, but I think I&#039;ll get used to it after few days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google maybe trying to have trade mark or brand change and testing it with favicon.<br />
I annoys me at first, but I think I&#8217;ll get used to it after few days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363562</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 21:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363562</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see this as an improvement yet. The old G was very recognizable. This is just the a &#039;g&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see this as an improvement yet. The old G was very recognizable. This is just the a &#8216;g&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paola Bonomo</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363561</link>
		<dc:creator>Paola Bonomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 14:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363561</guid>
		<description>I noticed it too. Of course, no amount of cosmetic changes can make Google an underdog again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed it too. Of course, no amount of cosmetic changes can make Google an underdog again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernst-Jan Pfauth</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363560</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernst-Jan Pfauth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363560</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your insightful comment Meryn, I think you have a good point. 

Also, as more and more people see Google as some sort of monopolist, it doesn&#039;t hurt to appear humble.

Thanks for the blog tip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your insightful comment Meryn, I think you have a good point. </p>
<p>Also, as more and more people see Google as some sort of monopolist, it doesn&#8217;t hurt to appear humble.</p>
<p>Thanks for the blog tip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meryn Stol</title>
		<link>http://thenextweb.com/2008/05/31/google-desperately-trying-to-appear-like-an-underdog/#comment-363559</link>
		<dc:creator>Meryn Stol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 12:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thenextweb.org/?p=1199#comment-363559</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is small. This report is well-justified.

I think the little g gives a more nimble impression. It makes Google seems more like a tool, and not as corporate. It places Google nearer to Apple (who even doesn&#039;t name its brand on its ipods) and Web 2.0 sites, and further away from Microsoft and Facebook. I think its expresses Google&#039;s wish to first and foremost keep us searchers happy. They have a good incentive for this: Without searchers, they wouldn&#039;t have advertising revenue. Now new competition in search is coming up, they will have to try harder to keep the influencers happy. They just can&#039;t have us recommending a different search engine to anyone.

Now of course the change of the favicon doesn&#039;t change all that, but I think it signals their ambition.

You may like to read Umair Haque. He often writes about the strategies of Google and Facebook: http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/haque/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is small. This report is well-justified.</p>
<p>I think the little g gives a more nimble impression. It makes Google seems more like a tool, and not as corporate. It places Google nearer to Apple (who even doesn&#8217;t name its brand on its ipods) and Web 2.0 sites, and further away from Microsoft and Facebook. I think its expresses Google&#8217;s wish to first and foremost keep us searchers happy. They have a good incentive for this: Without searchers, they wouldn&#8217;t have advertising revenue. Now new competition in search is coming up, they will have to try harder to keep the influencers happy. They just can&#8217;t have us recommending a different search engine to anyone.</p>
<p>Now of course the change of the favicon doesn&#8217;t change all that, but I think it signals their ambition.</p>
<p>You may like to read Umair Haque. He often writes about the strategies of Google and Facebook: <a href="http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/haque/" rel="nofollow">http://discussionleader.hbsp.com/haque/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

