Olympic Committee may sue if brands use hashtags or images from Rio games

Olympic Committee may sue if brands use hashtags or images from Rio games
Credit: Shutterstock

The Olympics are coming up, and everyone (except maybe the Russians) are hoping for big things from their national teams. But if companies tweet about it, there may be legal trouble.

The United States Olympic Committee (USOC) is sending letters to companies that sponsor Olympic athletes warning them not to use the hashtags ‘#Rio2016’ or ‘#TeamUSA’.

Sponsors are also encouraged to avoid using ‘Olympic,’ ‘Olympian’ and ‘Go for the gold’ as well as various other phrases, says ESPN.

The reason for the USOC’s terse guidelines? Sponsors of athletes are not necessarily USOC or International Olympic Committe (IOC) sponsors. Unless a company has a business relationship with one or both committees, they may end up in court.

Can you use emojis?!
Can you use emojis?!

But what constitutes sponsorship? Sally Bergesen, CEO of running equipment company Oiselle says “it costs $300,000 to send an Olympian to the Games, and for our athletes, the USOC has reimbursed them about 1 percent of that cost. Is that supporting them?”

USOC chief marketing officer Lisa Baird says “we need to give sponsors exclusivity to our intellectual property that is protected by U.S. law.”

And what if a family business decided to sponsor an athlete? Would the USOC in turn sue someone’s LLC if the company tweeted about the owner’s daughter in the Summer games? Will those who helped crowdfund a swimmer’s way to Rio be sued?

Oddly, an athlete and non-sponsor of the USOC can support one another during the Olympics — but neither can mention the games. To that, you may see your favorite athlete discuss patriotism and sports in a commercial, but if the company they’re representing isn’t an USOC sponsor, they can’t mention the Olympics.

And in an even odder (read: money grubbing) twist of fate, those ads were once prohibited during the games, but the IOC and USOC are making an exception this year — so long as the ads began running in March and last through the games.


It’s a ‘relaxation’ of the IOC’s Rule 40, which prohibits athletes and sponsors from discussing their relationship during the games. Ads still have to be approved by the committees, though. When asked how many companies were dedicating ad space to the five-month window, Baird would only say it was a “significant number.”

And it gets worse. The USOC will let a media entity (like The Next Web) use images, tweets or posts from its official channels — but not brands. According to ESPN, the letter says companies sponsoring athletes “cannot reference any Olympic results, cannot share or repost anything from the official Olympic account and cannot use any pictures taken at the Olympics.”

The IOC and USOC are free to trademark any hashtag they like, of course (we’ll just make up another) — but are Olympic results really intellectual property? Further, prohibiting “any pictures taken at the Olympics” from being used is obscene.

So if you don’t hear much about the Olympics from brands this Summer, don’t be surprised. A tweet is almost never worth a lawsuit.

USOC sends letter warning non-Olympic sponsor companies on ESPN

Read next: Review: Designing my own Xbox controller was fun, but yours can be weirder

Corona coverage

Read our daily coverage on how the tech industry is responding to the coronavirus and subscribe to our weekly newsletter Coronavirus in Context.

For tips and tricks on working remotely, check out our Growth Quarters articles here or follow us on Twitter.