It is no secret at all that the iPad is storming the fields taking seemingly every credit card hostage for a major charge. It is also by now nearly gospel that every major old-media publication is racing to the iPad to find some sort of salvation.
Apps on the iPad are supposed to be some form of hot ticket, something that we will get to in a moment, but for now our thesis is just this: the iPad encourages consumption in a way that radically changes the digital equation and future of content.
I was an iPad skeptic from even before it became a real product. On its launch day I was especially supportive, writing an article entitled: “I Call It The iLetdown – Why The iPad Missed The Mark And Blew Its Big Day.” I now, after some time with my iPad, recognize the important place of not only the iPad itself, but more broadly its form factor in the future of content consumption. It will change the way content is produced, the average amount that a user wishes to view, and how it will be delivered.
The iPad Effect On Content Intake
The iPad is more than an evolution on previous computing schemes, it adds an element of direct contact yielding personal interaction that changes the way a website feels. Touchscreens are of course not new, and on iPhones they have been an upgrade to the smartphone experience. But the iPad (and any comparable device in size, heft, speed, and simplicity) combines the best of modern technology and past experience into a package the render the internet new again. It becomes a fully new experience that is unlike any browsing that has been made massively available before. The touchscreen, screen size, speedy load times, make browsing something enjoyable. Not something to get done, but something to be done.
The direct effect of this level of interactivity I am postulating anecdotally, which creates a real relationship between content and viewer, is a dramatic uptick in total content intake. Hand an iPad to any friend of yours, and watch their eyes gloss as they begin to read without pause or stop. I am not discussing iBooks, that is merely an e-book solution that will attract the same niche audience that the Kindle used to have the corner on. No, people will read online articles by the fist-full on the device in time blocks that do not cause eye-strain (the iPad’s backlight screen is not amazing for hours of viewing if you are not accustomed to it), but still represent a serious commitment to the publications in question.
And this is where the group of publications that have their past in print, and one foot online, can possibly find a positive future in a world with relatively paltry ad rates: more total pageviews. The iPad when it races past 10 million units (this holiday season should provide it that opportunity), and other devices hit the market, they will become a strong generator of global page loads, and therefore ad loads. These readers will run up digital tabs that far exceed what they did before on their normal computers, providing more total monetization opportunities for the companies that need it the most: large, high-overhead operations that are struggling to adapt to the new realities of content.
Are Applications The Way To Cash In On This?
A short word on apps, and a warning against them as a solution. The iPhone is a broken little device, as it has to be to, due to its small screen. Reading on the iPhone is not pleasant, and it never can be. Apps make it simpler to read (and of course, watch, etc), by cutting the fat from websites and packaging it into a simpler-to-consume box. The iPad does not share the original problem, and so the need for apps is greatly diminished. Unless you are planning to take the Wired method by building something beautiful and wondrous, the best approach is to build a compliant website and then monetize it as you may.
Now this is not necessarily advertisements. As the iPad renders readers more loyal by their new found intrinsic desire to consume more, subscriptions may become a viable online model for someone other than the Wall Street Journal. At a minimum, more iPads means more people spending more time reading, consuming, and commenting. It’s a wonderful mix for publishers desperate to bring in more ad dollars.
It is under open question as to whether the iPad will be the resurrection of the RSS feed as a vitally important component of how content is distributed. I sincerely do not think so. RSS is an effective way to move massive amounts of text simply and with little guff, but the slate computer model allows for full websites to be (as we have discussed) to be shown and used without the need for any stripping down.
How Does This Manifest Itself?
People with iPads will tend to consume more, more often. To hunt and woo these readers a version of your website that is specifically designed to capture the slate interface will be a boon to your site in the future.
Slate computing is much more than the iPad (or will be, once others come out), allowing for this revolution to expand as does the product segment. Slate computing is the best vision that we have for the future of content delivery. Get on board, the ride ahead looks smooth and profitable.















Great post. Read it on mu iPad.
You even have your iPad typo! :)
haha. alex, did you bother to proof your own article? let’s not criticize simple typos, even in jest, when you’ve got gems like: “The iPhone is a broken little device, as it has to be to, due to its small screen.” “…but the slate computer model allows for full websites to be (as we have discussed) to be shown…”
there are a couple others, but i didn’t feel like finding them again.
this article is fluff, man. people are not going to consume any more with the ipad in their lap than they would with a notebook in their lap. oh i can touch the screen to navigate instead of using a touch pad? who cares?
show me something revolutionary about this device like the iphone showed in the smartphone category and maybe there will be a reason for the public to get on board. right now, it’s a bunch of fluff-talking, self-serving fanboys on the hype train.
that giant sucking sound? it’s your article.
I agree with most of the article, but think you over estimate the future non-iPad players in the tablet world. How many phones have come out to compete with the iPhone and yet how many can actually get close? I think Apple will lead this space for a long time and will continue selling a ton of the iPads and the iPhones are bigger on the net/mobile space.
@Alex, great post that is
Boris am still hoping and waiting for the template.
Well, you’re right, that’s what the iPad *might* have evolved into. Too bad AT&T killed that dream by throttling their data plan to 2GB/month – or, maybe two movies. Way to go, AT&T, way to kill the next killer app.
Really like this post, it has some really great lines, an enjoyable read Thank you !
Either you work for apple or you are retard. There is nothing revolutionary about a touch screen and all “slate” computing does is offer you less space and a shitty keyboard, as you have clearly demonstrated!
Can I run Visual Studio on iPad?
I think the iPad is cool, but I don’t honestly know what function it would serve for me. My computer is right there, why not just use it? It has flash support, and does a heck of a lot more than that. Eye strain is the reason I bought a Sony Reader, an iPad will not help with that. It might be nice to carry around, but I can do that with my laptop also. Am I missing something?
I agree. Ipad sucks! :P
It’s too early to make those statements.
As of right now it’s a shiny toy and it may remain a shiny toy, you don’t know.
Honestly it’s too big to carry without a bag, too heavy for reading unless you want to make a groove on your stomach. I heard a few businesses want to replace paper with it, good luck giving your ipad to your coworker to read your reports and then…. you’re without paper, yea, the ipad you just gave away…..
The past 2 months I’ve read about paper thin screens, as thin as hair. You want an everything killer, make a screen that’s thinner than paper and put it on anything you want.
Until then, the iPad is still the best thing on the market now. You can go ahead and wait while the rest of us is living it. It is absolutely not too big and heavy (it’s about the weight of a paperback book) and I love traveling with it instead of my laptop. All those people at coffee shops with their big heavy laptops are so jealous. They want one so bad but cant afford it unless they sell their clunkers.
I love my iPad (reading this article on it right now!). I almost never touch my PC anymore, and I’ve put my laptops and netbook into storage. This thing is phenomenal!
I will never touch an iPhad. It is not as cool as cult of mac tryhards believe it is. When Apple has to borrow some “cool” off Rupert Murdoch, then Apple is desperately short on “cool”.
As long as it performs like advertised, I see myself buying three Eee Pads for professional graphics use. They will replace the unreliable and buggy Wacom Cintiq I currently refuse to use in the office.
I hate to do it to skeptics but here it is: I told you so. I had defended the iPad many times before and aftter it came out and met with rude comments such as it’s just a big iPhone, you Mac cult! It’s not going to compete with Netbooks-it doesn’t even have USB or a camera! Mostly from PC and even some Mac techies. But who is laughing now?
People just don’t seem to get it until their moms and pops and everyone else (including their nannies and waiters) want one. It really is a tremendous media device and the apps are so much better and usable than the iPhone. I predict the iPod Touch would be obsolete soon especially if the iPad goes down in prices.
I still use my desktop for stuff like adcance Photoshop and video editing. That’s not what the iPad is designed for. But I haven’t touched my laptop for over 3 weeks now. I can do everything including trading stocks and online banking on my iPad.
Yes I too am reading this on my iPad. I love it. However, I will not pay 4 to 5 dollars for a single e-addition on any magazine.
Man, the Ipad is so overated, I’m glad I waited for reviews!